Simona Portaro, Angelo Alito, Giulia Leonardi, Nicola Marotta, Adriana Tisano, Daniele Bruschetta, Umile Giuseppe Longo, Antonio Ammendolia, Demetrio Milardi, Alessandro de Sire
{"title":"神经调节和康复方法对脊髓损伤患者疼痛缓解的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Simona Portaro, Angelo Alito, Giulia Leonardi, Nicola Marotta, Adriana Tisano, Daniele Bruschetta, Umile Giuseppe Longo, Antonio Ammendolia, Demetrio Milardi, Alessandro de Sire","doi":"10.1007/s10072-025-08077-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating neurological condition that causes physical dependency, psychological distress, and financial burden. Pain is a common consequence of SCI, significantly impacting quality of life. Effective pain management in SCI is challenging and requires multifaceted approaches. Among rehabilitation methods, non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), theta burst stimulation (TBS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and virtual reality (VR) have been explored. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of rehabilitation and non-invasive brain stimulation techniques on pain relief in SCI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect with the formula (\"spinal cord injury\") AND (\"pain\"). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies involving 319 patients were included. Patients in the control groups received: rTMS in seven trials, tDCS in seven trials, TBS in one trial, and TENS combined with VR in one trial. The trials analyzed were of poor methodological quality, characterized by small sample sizes, weak power analyses, varying clinical scores, and non-comparable follow-up periods. No major complications or serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results were inconsistent, with no solid evidence supporting the superiority of rehabilitation techniques over comparator treatments. However, the favorable safety profile and positive outcomes in some measures suggest potential benefits for pain management and quality of life. Further studies are necessary to better understand SCI-related pain and optimize treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"2995-3020"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152033/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of neuromodulation and rehabilitation approaches on pain relief in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Simona Portaro, Angelo Alito, Giulia Leonardi, Nicola Marotta, Adriana Tisano, Daniele Bruschetta, Umile Giuseppe Longo, Antonio Ammendolia, Demetrio Milardi, Alessandro de Sire\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10072-025-08077-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating neurological condition that causes physical dependency, psychological distress, and financial burden. Pain is a common consequence of SCI, significantly impacting quality of life. Effective pain management in SCI is challenging and requires multifaceted approaches. Among rehabilitation methods, non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), theta burst stimulation (TBS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and virtual reality (VR) have been explored. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of rehabilitation and non-invasive brain stimulation techniques on pain relief in SCI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect with the formula (\\\"spinal cord injury\\\") AND (\\\"pain\\\"). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies involving 319 patients were included. Patients in the control groups received: rTMS in seven trials, tDCS in seven trials, TBS in one trial, and TENS combined with VR in one trial. The trials analyzed were of poor methodological quality, characterized by small sample sizes, weak power analyses, varying clinical scores, and non-comparable follow-up periods. No major complications or serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results were inconsistent, with no solid evidence supporting the superiority of rehabilitation techniques over comparator treatments. However, the favorable safety profile and positive outcomes in some measures suggest potential benefits for pain management and quality of life. Further studies are necessary to better understand SCI-related pain and optimize treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2995-3020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152033/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-025-08077-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-025-08077-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of neuromodulation and rehabilitation approaches on pain relief in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Introduction: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating neurological condition that causes physical dependency, psychological distress, and financial burden. Pain is a common consequence of SCI, significantly impacting quality of life. Effective pain management in SCI is challenging and requires multifaceted approaches. Among rehabilitation methods, non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), theta burst stimulation (TBS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and virtual reality (VR) have been explored. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of rehabilitation and non-invasive brain stimulation techniques on pain relief in SCI patients.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect with the formula ("spinal cord injury") AND ("pain"). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
Results: Sixteen studies involving 319 patients were included. Patients in the control groups received: rTMS in seven trials, tDCS in seven trials, TBS in one trial, and TENS combined with VR in one trial. The trials analyzed were of poor methodological quality, characterized by small sample sizes, weak power analyses, varying clinical scores, and non-comparable follow-up periods. No major complications or serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusion: Results were inconsistent, with no solid evidence supporting the superiority of rehabilitation techniques over comparator treatments. However, the favorable safety profile and positive outcomes in some measures suggest potential benefits for pain management and quality of life. Further studies are necessary to better understand SCI-related pain and optimize treatment strategies.
期刊介绍:
Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.