神经调节和康复方法对脊髓损伤患者疼痛缓解的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1007/s10072-025-08077-y
Simona Portaro, Angelo Alito, Giulia Leonardi, Nicola Marotta, Adriana Tisano, Daniele Bruschetta, Umile Giuseppe Longo, Antonio Ammendolia, Demetrio Milardi, Alessandro de Sire
{"title":"神经调节和康复方法对脊髓损伤患者疼痛缓解的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Simona Portaro, Angelo Alito, Giulia Leonardi, Nicola Marotta, Adriana Tisano, Daniele Bruschetta, Umile Giuseppe Longo, Antonio Ammendolia, Demetrio Milardi, Alessandro de Sire","doi":"10.1007/s10072-025-08077-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating neurological condition that causes physical dependency, psychological distress, and financial burden. Pain is a common consequence of SCI, significantly impacting quality of life. Effective pain management in SCI is challenging and requires multifaceted approaches. Among rehabilitation methods, non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), theta burst stimulation (TBS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and virtual reality (VR) have been explored. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of rehabilitation and non-invasive brain stimulation techniques on pain relief in SCI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect with the formula (\"spinal cord injury\") AND (\"pain\"). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies involving 319 patients were included. Patients in the control groups received: rTMS in seven trials, tDCS in seven trials, TBS in one trial, and TENS combined with VR in one trial. The trials analyzed were of poor methodological quality, characterized by small sample sizes, weak power analyses, varying clinical scores, and non-comparable follow-up periods. No major complications or serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results were inconsistent, with no solid evidence supporting the superiority of rehabilitation techniques over comparator treatments. However, the favorable safety profile and positive outcomes in some measures suggest potential benefits for pain management and quality of life. Further studies are necessary to better understand SCI-related pain and optimize treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"2995-3020"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152033/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of neuromodulation and rehabilitation approaches on pain relief in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Simona Portaro, Angelo Alito, Giulia Leonardi, Nicola Marotta, Adriana Tisano, Daniele Bruschetta, Umile Giuseppe Longo, Antonio Ammendolia, Demetrio Milardi, Alessandro de Sire\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10072-025-08077-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating neurological condition that causes physical dependency, psychological distress, and financial burden. Pain is a common consequence of SCI, significantly impacting quality of life. Effective pain management in SCI is challenging and requires multifaceted approaches. Among rehabilitation methods, non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), theta burst stimulation (TBS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and virtual reality (VR) have been explored. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of rehabilitation and non-invasive brain stimulation techniques on pain relief in SCI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect with the formula (\\\"spinal cord injury\\\") AND (\\\"pain\\\"). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies involving 319 patients were included. Patients in the control groups received: rTMS in seven trials, tDCS in seven trials, TBS in one trial, and TENS combined with VR in one trial. The trials analyzed were of poor methodological quality, characterized by small sample sizes, weak power analyses, varying clinical scores, and non-comparable follow-up periods. No major complications or serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results were inconsistent, with no solid evidence supporting the superiority of rehabilitation techniques over comparator treatments. However, the favorable safety profile and positive outcomes in some measures suggest potential benefits for pain management and quality of life. Further studies are necessary to better understand SCI-related pain and optimize treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2995-3020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152033/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-025-08077-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-025-08077-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:脊髓损伤(SCI)是一种使人衰弱的神经系统疾病,会导致身体依赖、心理困扰和经济负担。疼痛是脊髓损伤的常见后果,严重影响生活质量。有效的疼痛管理是具有挑战性的,需要多方面的方法。在康复方法中,重复性经颅磁刺激(rTMS)、θ波脉冲刺激(TBS)、经颅直流刺激(tDCS)、经皮神经电刺激(TENS)、虚拟现实(VR)等非侵入性脑刺激技术得到了探索。本研究旨在评估康复和无创脑刺激技术对缓解脊髓损伤患者疼痛的疗效。方法:使用PubMed、Scopus和ScienceDirect对文献进行系统综述,公式为(“脊髓损伤”)和(“疼痛”)。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。结果:纳入16项研究,涉及319例患者。对照组患者接受rTMS 7例,tDCS 7例,TBS 1例,TENS联合VR 1例。所分析的试验的方法学质量较差,其特点是样本量小,功效分析弱,临床评分不同,随访期不可比较。无重大并发症或严重不良事件报道。结论:结果不一致,没有确凿的证据支持康复技术优于比较治疗。然而,在一些措施中,良好的安全性和积极的结果表明,在疼痛管理和生活质量方面有潜在的好处。为了更好地了解sci相关疼痛并优化治疗策略,需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of neuromodulation and rehabilitation approaches on pain relief in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating neurological condition that causes physical dependency, psychological distress, and financial burden. Pain is a common consequence of SCI, significantly impacting quality of life. Effective pain management in SCI is challenging and requires multifaceted approaches. Among rehabilitation methods, non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), theta burst stimulation (TBS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and virtual reality (VR) have been explored. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of rehabilitation and non-invasive brain stimulation techniques on pain relief in SCI patients.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect with the formula ("spinal cord injury") AND ("pain"). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.

Results: Sixteen studies involving 319 patients were included. Patients in the control groups received: rTMS in seven trials, tDCS in seven trials, TBS in one trial, and TENS combined with VR in one trial. The trials analyzed were of poor methodological quality, characterized by small sample sizes, weak power analyses, varying clinical scores, and non-comparable follow-up periods. No major complications or serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: Results were inconsistent, with no solid evidence supporting the superiority of rehabilitation techniques over comparator treatments. However, the favorable safety profile and positive outcomes in some measures suggest potential benefits for pain management and quality of life. Further studies are necessary to better understand SCI-related pain and optimize treatment strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信