医疗机构中耳念珠菌筛查的关键因素:一项系统综述。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Mycoses Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1111/myc.70043
Anders Skyrud Danielsen, Liz Ertzeid Ødeskaug, Ragnhild Raastad, Anne Kjerulf, Anne-Marie Andersen, Ragnhild Agathe Tornes, Jan P W Himmels, Ulf R Dahle, Miriam Sare, Brian Kristensen, Hanne-Merete Eriksen-Volle, Mari Molvik
{"title":"医疗机构中耳念珠菌筛查的关键因素:一项系统综述。","authors":"Anders Skyrud Danielsen, Liz Ertzeid Ødeskaug, Ragnhild Raastad, Anne Kjerulf, Anne-Marie Andersen, Ragnhild Agathe Tornes, Jan P W Himmels, Ulf R Dahle, Miriam Sare, Brian Kristensen, Hanne-Merete Eriksen-Volle, Mari Molvik","doi":"10.1111/myc.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Candida auris is an emerging fungal pathogen that is often multidrug-resistant. It can persist on skin and in hospital environments, leading to outbreaks and severe infections for patients at risk. Several countries and institutions are working on establishing guidelines and recommendations for prevention. This review aims to assess the evidence on factors associated with C. auris colonisation or infection, the duration of such colonisation, possible colonisation sites, and the risk of secondary cases to inform screening recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched five databases for primary studies and systematic reviews of our four outcomes. We excluded studies on treatment, management, laboratory methods, drug resistance, and environmental screening. From each paper, we extracted relevant data and summarised them in tables. Main findings were described narratively.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We selected 117 studies for inclusion. Most of the studies were observational studies. Without taking the method of testing into account, the duration of C. auris colonisation varied, with up to and beyond a year being common. The predominant sites of colonisation were the axillae and groin, with the nares and rectum being less common sites. The risk of secondary cases saw considerable variation across the studies, and the secondary cases primarily involved patients and not healthcare workers. Critical care settings, invasive medical devices, recent antimicrobial use, and comorbidities were often associated with C. auris colonisation and infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our review highlights that, despite relevant findings on factors influencing C. auris colonisation and infection, substantial gaps remain in the evidence supporting screening practices. Most studies were conducted reactively, in outbreak settings, and lack systematic protocols. Given these limitations, screening guidelines are likely to be more successful if grounded in medical theory and yeast microbiology rather than relying solely on current studies. Rigorous, well-designed research is urgently needed to inform future C. auris screening and control efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":18797,"journal":{"name":"Mycoses","volume":"68 3","pages":"e70043"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key Factors to Consider for Candida auris Screening in Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Anders Skyrud Danielsen, Liz Ertzeid Ødeskaug, Ragnhild Raastad, Anne Kjerulf, Anne-Marie Andersen, Ragnhild Agathe Tornes, Jan P W Himmels, Ulf R Dahle, Miriam Sare, Brian Kristensen, Hanne-Merete Eriksen-Volle, Mari Molvik\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/myc.70043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Candida auris is an emerging fungal pathogen that is often multidrug-resistant. It can persist on skin and in hospital environments, leading to outbreaks and severe infections for patients at risk. Several countries and institutions are working on establishing guidelines and recommendations for prevention. This review aims to assess the evidence on factors associated with C. auris colonisation or infection, the duration of such colonisation, possible colonisation sites, and the risk of secondary cases to inform screening recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched five databases for primary studies and systematic reviews of our four outcomes. We excluded studies on treatment, management, laboratory methods, drug resistance, and environmental screening. From each paper, we extracted relevant data and summarised them in tables. Main findings were described narratively.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We selected 117 studies for inclusion. Most of the studies were observational studies. Without taking the method of testing into account, the duration of C. auris colonisation varied, with up to and beyond a year being common. The predominant sites of colonisation were the axillae and groin, with the nares and rectum being less common sites. The risk of secondary cases saw considerable variation across the studies, and the secondary cases primarily involved patients and not healthcare workers. Critical care settings, invasive medical devices, recent antimicrobial use, and comorbidities were often associated with C. auris colonisation and infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our review highlights that, despite relevant findings on factors influencing C. auris colonisation and infection, substantial gaps remain in the evidence supporting screening practices. Most studies were conducted reactively, in outbreak settings, and lack systematic protocols. Given these limitations, screening guidelines are likely to be more successful if grounded in medical theory and yeast microbiology rather than relying solely on current studies. Rigorous, well-designed research is urgently needed to inform future C. auris screening and control efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mycoses\",\"volume\":\"68 3\",\"pages\":\"e70043\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mycoses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.70043\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycoses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.70043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:耳念珠菌是一种新兴的真菌病原体,通常具有多重耐药。它可以在皮肤和医院环境中持续存在,导致有风险的患者爆发和严重感染。一些国家和机构正在制定预防的指导方针和建议。本综述旨在评估与耳球菌定植或感染相关的因素、这种定植的持续时间、可能的定植地点以及继发病例的风险,从而为筛查建议提供依据。方法:我们系统地检索了5个数据库,对我们的4个结果进行了初步研究和系统评价。我们排除了治疗、管理、实验室方法、耐药性和环境筛选方面的研究。我们从每篇论文中提取相关数据并汇总成表格。叙述了主要发现。结果:我们选择了117项研究纳入。大多数研究都是观察性研究。在不考虑检测方法的情况下,金黄色葡萄球菌定植的持续时间各不相同,最多可达一年或一年以上的情况很常见。主要的定植部位是腋窝和腹股沟,鼻腔和直肠是不常见的部位。继发病例的风险在研究中有相当大的差异,继发病例主要涉及患者而不是医护人员。重症监护环境、侵入性医疗器械、近期抗菌药物使用和合并症通常与耳球菌定植和感染有关。结论:我们的综述强调,尽管发现了影响金黄色葡萄球菌定植和感染的相关因素,但在支持筛查实践的证据方面仍存在实质性差距。大多数研究是在疫情环境下进行的反应性研究,缺乏系统的方案。考虑到这些限制,如果基于医学理论和酵母微生物学,而不是仅仅依靠目前的研究,筛选指南可能会更成功。迫切需要严谨、精心设计的研究,为今后的auris筛查和控制工作提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Key Factors to Consider for Candida auris Screening in Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review.

Background: Candida auris is an emerging fungal pathogen that is often multidrug-resistant. It can persist on skin and in hospital environments, leading to outbreaks and severe infections for patients at risk. Several countries and institutions are working on establishing guidelines and recommendations for prevention. This review aims to assess the evidence on factors associated with C. auris colonisation or infection, the duration of such colonisation, possible colonisation sites, and the risk of secondary cases to inform screening recommendations.

Methods: We systematically searched five databases for primary studies and systematic reviews of our four outcomes. We excluded studies on treatment, management, laboratory methods, drug resistance, and environmental screening. From each paper, we extracted relevant data and summarised them in tables. Main findings were described narratively.

Findings: We selected 117 studies for inclusion. Most of the studies were observational studies. Without taking the method of testing into account, the duration of C. auris colonisation varied, with up to and beyond a year being common. The predominant sites of colonisation were the axillae and groin, with the nares and rectum being less common sites. The risk of secondary cases saw considerable variation across the studies, and the secondary cases primarily involved patients and not healthcare workers. Critical care settings, invasive medical devices, recent antimicrobial use, and comorbidities were often associated with C. auris colonisation and infection.

Conclusion: Our review highlights that, despite relevant findings on factors influencing C. auris colonisation and infection, substantial gaps remain in the evidence supporting screening practices. Most studies were conducted reactively, in outbreak settings, and lack systematic protocols. Given these limitations, screening guidelines are likely to be more successful if grounded in medical theory and yeast microbiology rather than relying solely on current studies. Rigorous, well-designed research is urgently needed to inform future C. auris screening and control efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mycoses
Mycoses 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Mycoses provides an international forum for original papers in English on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapy, prophylaxis, and epidemiology of fungal infectious diseases in humans as well as on the biology of pathogenic fungi. Medical mycology as part of medical microbiology is advancing rapidly. Effective therapeutic strategies are already available in chemotherapy and are being further developed. Their application requires reliable laboratory diagnostic techniques, which, in turn, result from mycological basic research. Opportunistic mycoses vary greatly in their clinical and pathological symptoms, because the underlying disease of a patient at risk decisively determines their symptomatology and progress. The journal Mycoses is therefore of interest to scientists in fundamental mycological research, mycological laboratory diagnosticians and clinicians interested in fungal infections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信