摔跤运动员和力量训练运动员肘关节屈肌形态、生理和表现的比较分析。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Francesco Coletta, Leonardo Cesanelli, Sigitas Kamandulis, Daniele Conte
{"title":"摔跤运动员和力量训练运动员肘关节屈肌形态、生理和表现的比较分析。","authors":"Francesco Coletta, Leonardo Cesanelli, Sigitas Kamandulis, Daniele Conte","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Coletta, F, Cesanelli, L, Kamandulis, S, and Conte, D. Comparative analysis of elbow flexor morphology, physiology, and performance between arm wrestlers and strength-trained athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-This study aims to compare the morphological, performance, and physiological characteristics of the elbow flexors between arm wrestlers and strength-trained athletes. Nine national and international level arm wrestlers (age = 30.5 ± 7.7 years, body mass = 89.4 ± 7.5 kg, stature = 183 ± 7.3 cm, strength training experience = 12.7 ± 8.6 years, arm wrestling training experience = 4.8 ± 2 years) and 9 strength-trained athletes (age = 28.6 ± 4.6 years, body mass = 88.2 ± 15.4 kg, stature = 179.4 ± 5.8 cm, strength training experience = 11.3 ± 8 years) voluntarily participated in the study. Arm and forearm circumferences of the dominant upper limb were measured to assess the anthropometric characteristics. Moreover, morphological evaluations of the biceps brachii muscle and distal tendon thickness were conducted using ultrasound. Peak torque (PT) and rate of force development (RFD) were assessed using 2 elbow flexion maximally voluntary isometric contraction tests (test-1: 3 × 3 seconds; test-2: 3 × 20 seconds). During test-2, biceps brachii oxygenation levels were measured using near-infrared spectroscopy. Arm wrestlers exhibited greater forearm hypertrophy compared with strength-trained athletes (p = 0.005; effect size [ES] = 1.54; large), whereas no differences (p > 0.05) were found in arm circumference and biceps brachii muscle and tendon thickness (normalized by muscle thickness). In addition, arm wrestlers showed higher PT in both tests (p < 0.05; ES = moderate-to-large) and higher RFD only in test-1 (p < 0.005). Finally, a greater reduction in muscle oxygenation levels (p = 0.025; ES = 0.277; moderate) was found compared with strength-trained athletes. This study provides insights of the arm wrestlers' physiological and performance characteristics allowing coaches to design appropriate training sessions in this unique sport.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Elbow Flexor Morphology, Physiology, and Performance Between Arm Wrestlers and Strength-Trained Athletes.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Coletta, Leonardo Cesanelli, Sigitas Kamandulis, Daniele Conte\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Coletta, F, Cesanelli, L, Kamandulis, S, and Conte, D. Comparative analysis of elbow flexor morphology, physiology, and performance between arm wrestlers and strength-trained athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-This study aims to compare the morphological, performance, and physiological characteristics of the elbow flexors between arm wrestlers and strength-trained athletes. Nine national and international level arm wrestlers (age = 30.5 ± 7.7 years, body mass = 89.4 ± 7.5 kg, stature = 183 ± 7.3 cm, strength training experience = 12.7 ± 8.6 years, arm wrestling training experience = 4.8 ± 2 years) and 9 strength-trained athletes (age = 28.6 ± 4.6 years, body mass = 88.2 ± 15.4 kg, stature = 179.4 ± 5.8 cm, strength training experience = 11.3 ± 8 years) voluntarily participated in the study. Arm and forearm circumferences of the dominant upper limb were measured to assess the anthropometric characteristics. Moreover, morphological evaluations of the biceps brachii muscle and distal tendon thickness were conducted using ultrasound. Peak torque (PT) and rate of force development (RFD) were assessed using 2 elbow flexion maximally voluntary isometric contraction tests (test-1: 3 × 3 seconds; test-2: 3 × 20 seconds). During test-2, biceps brachii oxygenation levels were measured using near-infrared spectroscopy. Arm wrestlers exhibited greater forearm hypertrophy compared with strength-trained athletes (p = 0.005; effect size [ES] = 1.54; large), whereas no differences (p > 0.05) were found in arm circumference and biceps brachii muscle and tendon thickness (normalized by muscle thickness). In addition, arm wrestlers showed higher PT in both tests (p < 0.05; ES = moderate-to-large) and higher RFD only in test-1 (p < 0.005). Finally, a greater reduction in muscle oxygenation levels (p = 0.025; ES = 0.277; moderate) was found compared with strength-trained athletes. This study provides insights of the arm wrestlers' physiological and performance characteristics allowing coaches to design appropriate training sessions in this unique sport.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005071\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:Coletta, F, Cesanelli, L, Kamandulis, S, and Conte, D.掰手腕运动员和力量训练运动员肘关节屈肌形态、生理和表现的比较分析。[J] .力量杂志,XX(X): 000-000, 2024-本研究旨在比较扳手腕运动员和力量训练运动员肘关节屈肌的形态、表现和生理特征。九个国家和国际水平摔跤(= 30.5±7.7岁,体重= 89.4±7.5公斤,身高= 183±7.3厘米,力量训练经验= 12.7±8.6年,手臂摔跤训练经验= 4.8±2年)和9 strength-trained运动员(= 28.6±4.6岁,体重= 88.2±15.4公斤,身高= 179.4±5.8厘米,力量训练经验= 11.3±8年)自愿参与这项研究。测量优势上肢的手臂和前臂周长以评估人体测量特征。此外,利用超声对肱二头肌和远端肌腱厚度进行形态学评价。峰值扭矩(PT)和力发展率(RFD)通过2次肘关节屈曲最大自主等距收缩试验(test-1: 3 × 3秒;Test-2: 3 × 20秒)。在测试2中,使用近红外光谱测量肱二头肌氧合水平。与力量训练的运动员相比,摔跤运动员表现出更大的前臂肥大(p = 0.005;效应量[ES] = 1.54;臂围、肱二头肌和肌腱厚度(按肌肉厚度归一化)差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。此外,摔跤运动员在两项测试中均表现出更高的PT (p < 0.05;ES =中至大)和更高的RFD仅在test-1中(p < 0.005)。最后,肌肉氧合水平降低幅度更大(p = 0.025;Es = 0.277;中度),与力量训练的运动员相比。这项研究提供了掰手腕运动员的生理和表现特征的见解,使教练能够在这项独特的运动中设计适当的训练课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Elbow Flexor Morphology, Physiology, and Performance Between Arm Wrestlers and Strength-Trained Athletes.

Abstract: Coletta, F, Cesanelli, L, Kamandulis, S, and Conte, D. Comparative analysis of elbow flexor morphology, physiology, and performance between arm wrestlers and strength-trained athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-This study aims to compare the morphological, performance, and physiological characteristics of the elbow flexors between arm wrestlers and strength-trained athletes. Nine national and international level arm wrestlers (age = 30.5 ± 7.7 years, body mass = 89.4 ± 7.5 kg, stature = 183 ± 7.3 cm, strength training experience = 12.7 ± 8.6 years, arm wrestling training experience = 4.8 ± 2 years) and 9 strength-trained athletes (age = 28.6 ± 4.6 years, body mass = 88.2 ± 15.4 kg, stature = 179.4 ± 5.8 cm, strength training experience = 11.3 ± 8 years) voluntarily participated in the study. Arm and forearm circumferences of the dominant upper limb were measured to assess the anthropometric characteristics. Moreover, morphological evaluations of the biceps brachii muscle and distal tendon thickness were conducted using ultrasound. Peak torque (PT) and rate of force development (RFD) were assessed using 2 elbow flexion maximally voluntary isometric contraction tests (test-1: 3 × 3 seconds; test-2: 3 × 20 seconds). During test-2, biceps brachii oxygenation levels were measured using near-infrared spectroscopy. Arm wrestlers exhibited greater forearm hypertrophy compared with strength-trained athletes (p = 0.005; effect size [ES] = 1.54; large), whereas no differences (p > 0.05) were found in arm circumference and biceps brachii muscle and tendon thickness (normalized by muscle thickness). In addition, arm wrestlers showed higher PT in both tests (p < 0.05; ES = moderate-to-large) and higher RFD only in test-1 (p < 0.005). Finally, a greater reduction in muscle oxygenation levels (p = 0.025; ES = 0.277; moderate) was found compared with strength-trained athletes. This study provides insights of the arm wrestlers' physiological and performance characteristics allowing coaches to design appropriate training sessions in this unique sport.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信