远程护理在白内障手术中的疗效:一项系统综述。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Joukje C Wanten, Maartje H M Segers, Jos Kleijnen, Noël J C Bauer, Rudy M M A Nuijts
{"title":"远程护理在白内障手术中的疗效:一项系统综述。","authors":"Joukje C Wanten, Maartje H M Segers, Jos Kleijnen, Noël J C Bauer, Rudy M M A Nuijts","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Topic: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of currently available digital and remote care applications for postoperative cataract management compared to traditional methods for postoperative clinical measurements.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>With the increasing demand for ophthalmological services and an anticipated shortage of professionals, innovative approaches are needed to optimize care. Cataract surgery, characterized by its high safety profile and turnover rate, is well-suited for digital and remote care solutions, which could enhance the postoperative patient pathway, potentially leading to substantial time and cost savings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed in Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, KSR Evidence, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on digital tools, telemedicine or remote care in postoperative cataract management. Reported outcomes included patient reported outcomes (PROMs), visual acuity, refraction, intraocular pressure, slitlamp and fundus examination, or complication prevalence. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Assessment Tool (version 2) and Joanna Briggs Institute Critical appraisal checklists. Data extraction included both qualitative and quantitative information. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42024505933).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 11,319 studies, of which 14 were included. These comprised 4 RCTs and 10 observational studies involving 2681 patients. Interventions were categorized into telephone consultation, messaging, automated phone calls, and mobile applications/software. Telephone consultations were effective for follow-up screening, and automated phone calls also showed promising results. Messaging was suggested to improve adherence in the early postoperative period. Visual acuity assessment tools showed potential as screening methods, but exhibited variability compared to conventional methods and had wide 95% limits of agreement. All types of interventions were well-accepted by patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early evidence supports a positive impact of implementing digital and remote care tools in the postoperative cataract management pathway, particularly for screening purposes. However, further research is needed to define their roles and develop clinical practice guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Remote Care in Cataract Surgery: a Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Joukje C Wanten, Maartje H M Segers, Jos Kleijnen, Noël J C Bauer, Rudy M M A Nuijts\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Topic: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of currently available digital and remote care applications for postoperative cataract management compared to traditional methods for postoperative clinical measurements.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>With the increasing demand for ophthalmological services and an anticipated shortage of professionals, innovative approaches are needed to optimize care. Cataract surgery, characterized by its high safety profile and turnover rate, is well-suited for digital and remote care solutions, which could enhance the postoperative patient pathway, potentially leading to substantial time and cost savings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed in Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, KSR Evidence, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on digital tools, telemedicine or remote care in postoperative cataract management. Reported outcomes included patient reported outcomes (PROMs), visual acuity, refraction, intraocular pressure, slitlamp and fundus examination, or complication prevalence. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Assessment Tool (version 2) and Joanna Briggs Institute Critical appraisal checklists. Data extraction included both qualitative and quantitative information. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42024505933).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 11,319 studies, of which 14 were included. These comprised 4 RCTs and 10 observational studies involving 2681 patients. Interventions were categorized into telephone consultation, messaging, automated phone calls, and mobile applications/software. Telephone consultations were effective for follow-up screening, and automated phone calls also showed promising results. Messaging was suggested to improve adherence in the early postoperative period. Visual acuity assessment tools showed potential as screening methods, but exhibited variability compared to conventional methods and had wide 95% limits of agreement. All types of interventions were well-accepted by patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early evidence supports a positive impact of implementing digital and remote care tools in the postoperative cataract management pathway, particularly for screening purposes. However, further research is needed to define their roles and develop clinical practice guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001652\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001652","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主题:评估目前可用的数字和远程护理应用在白内障术后管理中的效果,并与传统的术后临床测量方法进行比较。临床相关性:随着眼科服务需求的增加和专业人员的预期短缺,需要创新的方法来优化护理。白内障手术具有高安全性和高周转率的特点,非常适合数字化和远程护理解决方案,这可以增强术后患者通路,潜在地节省大量时间和成本。方法:系统检索Ovid Embase、Ovid MEDLINE、KSR Evidence、CINAHL和Cochrane CENTRAL Library中有关数字工具、远程医疗或远程护理在白内障术后管理中的随机对照试验(rct)和观察性研究。报告的结果包括患者报告结果(PROMs)、视力、屈光、眼压、裂隙灯和眼底检查或并发症发生率。偏倚风险评估采用Cochrane风险-偏倚评估工具(版本2)和乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估清单。数据提取包括定性和定量信息。该协议在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024505933)。结果:检索确定了11319项研究,其中14项被纳入。其中包括4项随机对照试验和10项观察性研究,涉及2681名患者。干预措施分为电话咨询、短信、自动电话呼叫和移动应用程序/软件。电话咨询对后续筛查是有效的,自动电话也显示出有希望的结果。建议在术后早期发送信息以提高依从性。视力评估工具显示出作为筛查方法的潜力,但与传统方法相比表现出可变性,并且有95%的一致性限制。各种干预措施均为患者所接受。结论:早期证据支持在白内障术后管理途径中实施数字化和远程护理工具的积极影响,特别是用于筛查目的。然而,需要进一步的研究来确定它们的作用并制定临床实践指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Remote Care in Cataract Surgery: a Systematic Review.

Topic: To evaluate the efficacy of currently available digital and remote care applications for postoperative cataract management compared to traditional methods for postoperative clinical measurements.

Clinical relevance: With the increasing demand for ophthalmological services and an anticipated shortage of professionals, innovative approaches are needed to optimize care. Cataract surgery, characterized by its high safety profile and turnover rate, is well-suited for digital and remote care solutions, which could enhance the postoperative patient pathway, potentially leading to substantial time and cost savings.

Methods: A systematic search was performed in Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, KSR Evidence, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on digital tools, telemedicine or remote care in postoperative cataract management. Reported outcomes included patient reported outcomes (PROMs), visual acuity, refraction, intraocular pressure, slitlamp and fundus examination, or complication prevalence. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Assessment Tool (version 2) and Joanna Briggs Institute Critical appraisal checklists. Data extraction included both qualitative and quantitative information. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42024505933).

Results: The search identified 11,319 studies, of which 14 were included. These comprised 4 RCTs and 10 observational studies involving 2681 patients. Interventions were categorized into telephone consultation, messaging, automated phone calls, and mobile applications/software. Telephone consultations were effective for follow-up screening, and automated phone calls also showed promising results. Messaging was suggested to improve adherence in the early postoperative period. Visual acuity assessment tools showed potential as screening methods, but exhibited variability compared to conventional methods and had wide 95% limits of agreement. All types of interventions were well-accepted by patients.

Conclusion: Early evidence supports a positive impact of implementing digital and remote care tools in the postoperative cataract management pathway, particularly for screening purposes. However, further research is needed to define their roles and develop clinical practice guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信