Postoperative pain after MiniLap percutaneous versus standard laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy: A propensity-matched study.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing standard laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy versus those using the MiniLap percutaneous surgical system, aiming to demonstrate the non-inferiority of this ultra-minimally invasive surgical technique compared to the current gold standard.

Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center propensity-matched case-control study. A total of 80 surgical patients undergoing salpingo-oophorectomy for benign pathology were selected, with 40 in each group (MiniLap in group A and S-LPS in group B). Postoperative pain was subjectively reported at 2, 4, 12, and 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes of this study were to evaluate differences in the duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and cosmetic results.

Results: The median operative time was 57.7 min (range, 28-125) in group A and 75.5 min (range, 22-180) in group B (P value 0.005). No statistical differences were recorded in terms of estimated blood loss (P value 0.05), length of hospital stay (P value 0.74), complications (P-value 0.31), and postoperative pain (P value 0.06 at 2 h postoperatively). Cosmetic outcomes acquired through subjective assessment by the patient and surgeon at discharge and 1 month after surgery demonstrated a statistically significant higher satisfaction rate in the MiniLap compared to the S-LPS group.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that salpingo-oophorectomy performed with the MiniLap system is feasible, safe, and well-tolerated by patients. Furthermore, this technique has proven to be non-inferior to standard LPS in terms of postoperative pain, blood loss, hospital stay duration, and complications.