甲氨蝶呤对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者心血管预后和左心室功能的长期影响:TETHYS试验五年随访》。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1159/000545187
Gabrielle Cristina Raimundo, Lilian Volpato Legat, Daniel Medeiros Moreira
{"title":"甲氨蝶呤对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者心血管预后和左心室功能的长期影响:TETHYS试验五年随访》。","authors":"Gabrielle Cristina Raimundo, Lilian Volpato Legat, Daniel Medeiros Moreira","doi":"10.1159/000545187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inflammation plays a central role in myocardial infarction (MI) and subsequent cardiac remodeling. The TETHYS study assessed the long-term effects of methotrexate (MTX) in ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) patients, focusing on ventricular function and major cardiovascular events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, observational follow-up study of 81 patients from the TETHYS trial, randomized to receive either MTX or placebo. The primary objective was to evaluate the long-term effects of MTX on cardiovascular outcomes using a win ratio (WR) approach, including death, reinfarction, stroke, rehospitalization, and the difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at five years. The secondary objective was to assess LVEF improvement after 180 days. A WR analysis was performed to assess cardiovascular outcomes. LVEF changes over time were analyzed using ANCOVA for repeated measures. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MTX treatment resulted in significantly fewer wins in the WR analysis compared to placebo (WR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.93; p = 0.026). There was no significant difference in LVEF trajectory over time (p = 0.308). However, MTX showed a significant improvement in LVEF when comparing 180 days to 3 months: 0.009% (MTX) vs. -0.105% (placebo), p = 0.020.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MTX did not improve long-term cardiovascular outcomes and was associated with more adverse events compared to placebo. No significant differences were found in LVEF trajectory over time. A transient improvement in LVEF was observed at 180 days but did not translate to better long-term outcomes. .</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Effects of Methotrexate on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Left Ventricular Function in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Five-Year Follow-Up of the TETHYS Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Gabrielle Cristina Raimundo, Lilian Volpato Legat, Daniel Medeiros Moreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000545187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inflammation plays a central role in myocardial infarction (MI) and subsequent cardiac remodeling. The TETHYS study assessed the long-term effects of methotrexate (MTX) in ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) patients, focusing on ventricular function and major cardiovascular events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, observational follow-up study of 81 patients from the TETHYS trial, randomized to receive either MTX or placebo. The primary objective was to evaluate the long-term effects of MTX on cardiovascular outcomes using a win ratio (WR) approach, including death, reinfarction, stroke, rehospitalization, and the difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at five years. The secondary objective was to assess LVEF improvement after 180 days. A WR analysis was performed to assess cardiovascular outcomes. LVEF changes over time were analyzed using ANCOVA for repeated measures. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MTX treatment resulted in significantly fewer wins in the WR analysis compared to placebo (WR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.93; p = 0.026). There was no significant difference in LVEF trajectory over time (p = 0.308). However, MTX showed a significant improvement in LVEF when comparing 180 days to 3 months: 0.009% (MTX) vs. -0.105% (placebo), p = 0.020.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MTX did not improve long-term cardiovascular outcomes and was associated with more adverse events compared to placebo. No significant differences were found in LVEF trajectory over time. A transient improvement in LVEF was observed at 180 days but did not translate to better long-term outcomes. .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545187\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-Term Effects of Methotrexate on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Left Ventricular Function in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Five-Year Follow-Up of the TETHYS Trial.

Introduction: Inflammation plays a central role in myocardial infarction (MI) and subsequent cardiac remodeling. The TETHYS study assessed the long-term effects of methotrexate (MTX) in ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) patients, focusing on ventricular function and major cardiovascular events.

Methods: This was a prospective, observational follow-up study of 81 patients from the TETHYS trial, randomized to receive either MTX or placebo. The primary objective was to evaluate the long-term effects of MTX on cardiovascular outcomes using a win ratio (WR) approach, including death, reinfarction, stroke, rehospitalization, and the difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at five years. The secondary objective was to assess LVEF improvement after 180 days. A WR analysis was performed to assess cardiovascular outcomes. LVEF changes over time were analyzed using ANCOVA for repeated measures. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results: MTX treatment resulted in significantly fewer wins in the WR analysis compared to placebo (WR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.93; p = 0.026). There was no significant difference in LVEF trajectory over time (p = 0.308). However, MTX showed a significant improvement in LVEF when comparing 180 days to 3 months: 0.009% (MTX) vs. -0.105% (placebo), p = 0.020.

Conclusions: MTX did not improve long-term cardiovascular outcomes and was associated with more adverse events compared to placebo. No significant differences were found in LVEF trajectory over time. A transient improvement in LVEF was observed at 180 days but did not translate to better long-term outcomes. .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology
Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信