在复杂和后危机时代教育管理者的领导和职业行为的评估:教育工作者的观点。

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Sara Jambarsang, Amir Houshang Mehrparvar, Fatemeh Keshmiri
{"title":"在复杂和后危机时代教育管理者的领导和职业行为的评估:教育工作者的观点。","authors":"Sara Jambarsang, Amir Houshang Mehrparvar, Fatemeh Keshmiri","doi":"10.1186/s13104-025-07166-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate educational managers from the viewpoints of stakeholders (educators and faculty officials) during two years of the COVID-19 pandemic and two years of the post-COVID era. This was a longitudinal study conducted from 2018 to 2023 in two phases: the first phase consisted of compiling and psychometric assessment of the tools for evaluation of educational managers in the two domains of leadership and professional behavior, and the second phase included evaluation of leadership behavior and professional behavior of university educational managers during four years. Descriptive indices were used to summarize the data. Exploratory factor analysis was used to extract the priority components in the two domains of professional behavior and leadership behavior of educational managers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The validity of the tools was confirmed in the first step. Adherence to the principles of professionalism such as honesty and responsibility, and the use of management principles including constructive communication, monitoring, and evaluation during the crisis and post-crisis were highlighted by the educational managers. Implementing evaluation and providing feedback in complex and critical times in educational systems facilitates the achievement of the goals of the system and responding to the needs of the system.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of leadership and professional behavior of educational managers in the complex and post-crisis era: perspectives of educators.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Jambarsang, Amir Houshang Mehrparvar, Fatemeh Keshmiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13104-025-07166-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate educational managers from the viewpoints of stakeholders (educators and faculty officials) during two years of the COVID-19 pandemic and two years of the post-COVID era. This was a longitudinal study conducted from 2018 to 2023 in two phases: the first phase consisted of compiling and psychometric assessment of the tools for evaluation of educational managers in the two domains of leadership and professional behavior, and the second phase included evaluation of leadership behavior and professional behavior of university educational managers during four years. Descriptive indices were used to summarize the data. Exploratory factor analysis was used to extract the priority components in the two domains of professional behavior and leadership behavior of educational managers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The validity of the tools was confirmed in the first step. Adherence to the principles of professionalism such as honesty and responsibility, and the use of management principles including constructive communication, monitoring, and evaluation during the crisis and post-crisis were highlighted by the educational managers. Implementing evaluation and providing feedback in complex and critical times in educational systems facilitates the achievement of the goals of the system and responding to the needs of the system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895347/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07166-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07166-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在从利益相关者(教育工作者和教职员工)的角度评估2019冠状病毒病大流行期间和后covid时代的两年教育管理者。本研究是一项从2018年到2023年的纵向研究,分两个阶段进行:第一阶段是对领导力和职业行为两个领域的教育管理者评价工具的编制和心理测量学评估,第二阶段是为期四年的大学教育管理者领导行为和职业行为的评估。采用描述性指标对数据进行汇总。采用探索性因子分析方法提取教育管理者职业行为和领导行为两个领域的优先级成分。结果:第一步验证了工具的有效性。教育管理人员强调,在危机期间和危机后,坚持诚实和责任等专业原则,运用建设性的沟通、监督和评估等管理原则。在教育系统的复杂和关键时期实施评估和提供反馈,有助于实现系统的目标和响应系统的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of leadership and professional behavior of educational managers in the complex and post-crisis era: perspectives of educators.

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate educational managers from the viewpoints of stakeholders (educators and faculty officials) during two years of the COVID-19 pandemic and two years of the post-COVID era. This was a longitudinal study conducted from 2018 to 2023 in two phases: the first phase consisted of compiling and psychometric assessment of the tools for evaluation of educational managers in the two domains of leadership and professional behavior, and the second phase included evaluation of leadership behavior and professional behavior of university educational managers during four years. Descriptive indices were used to summarize the data. Exploratory factor analysis was used to extract the priority components in the two domains of professional behavior and leadership behavior of educational managers.

Results: The validity of the tools was confirmed in the first step. Adherence to the principles of professionalism such as honesty and responsibility, and the use of management principles including constructive communication, monitoring, and evaluation during the crisis and post-crisis were highlighted by the educational managers. Implementing evaluation and providing feedback in complex and critical times in educational systems facilitates the achievement of the goals of the system and responding to the needs of the system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信