创伤性脑损伤史成人(50岁以上)抑郁单项筛查

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Summer N Rolin, Jeremy J Davis
{"title":"创伤性脑损伤史成人(50岁以上)抑郁单项筛查","authors":"Summer N Rolin, Jeremy J Davis","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-item depression screening has shown utility in young adult samples with limited work focused on individuals 50 and older. We examined single-item depression screening in adults 50 and older with a history of TBI one year post-injury.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This project involved secondary analysis of deidentified TRACK-TBI data. The sample (N = 508) included 61 control participants and 447 cases grouped by TBI severity. Outcome measures included the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 depression scale (BSI-D) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Depression was determined psychometrically by BSI-D (≥63 T) and PHQ-9 (≥10) if either score was above the cutoff. The Rivermead Postconcussion Symptoms Questionnaire depression item (RPQ-D) was used in logistic regression (LR) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to predict depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Depression was observed in 16.1% of cases and 6.6% of control participants (p = .05) with non-significant variability across TBI severity (12.9-18.3%; p = .17). The LR model with age, education, TBI severity, and RPQ-D as predictors was significant with age and RPQ-D as significant predictors. The model classified 87.9% of participants correctly. The area under the ROC curve was 0.86. The optimal cutoff was RPQ-D ≥ 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single-item screening for depression is a suitable approach in adults 50 and older with a history of TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-Item Screening for Depression in Adults (50+) with History of Traumatic Brain Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Summer N Rolin, Jeremy J Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arclin/acaf023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-item depression screening has shown utility in young adult samples with limited work focused on individuals 50 and older. We examined single-item depression screening in adults 50 and older with a history of TBI one year post-injury.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This project involved secondary analysis of deidentified TRACK-TBI data. The sample (N = 508) included 61 control participants and 447 cases grouped by TBI severity. Outcome measures included the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 depression scale (BSI-D) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Depression was determined psychometrically by BSI-D (≥63 T) and PHQ-9 (≥10) if either score was above the cutoff. The Rivermead Postconcussion Symptoms Questionnaire depression item (RPQ-D) was used in logistic regression (LR) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to predict depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Depression was observed in 16.1% of cases and 6.6% of control participants (p = .05) with non-significant variability across TBI severity (12.9-18.3%; p = .17). The LR model with age, education, TBI severity, and RPQ-D as predictors was significant with age and RPQ-D as significant predictors. The model classified 87.9% of participants correctly. The area under the ROC curve was 0.86. The optimal cutoff was RPQ-D ≥ 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single-item screening for depression is a suitable approach in adults 50 and older with a history of TBI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:单项抑郁症筛查在年轻人样本中显示出效用,但有限的工作集中在50岁及以上的个体。我们对创伤后一年有创伤性脑损伤病史的50岁及以上的成年人进行单项抑郁筛查。方法:本项目涉及对未识别的TRACK-TBI数据进行二次分析。样本(N = 508)包括61名对照参与者和447例按TBI严重程度分组的患者。结果测量包括简要症状量表-18抑郁量表(BSI-D)和患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)。如果BSI-D(≥63 T)和PHQ-9(≥10)得分高于临界值,则采用心理测量学方法测定抑郁。采用Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷抑郁项目(RPQ-D)进行logistic回归(LR)和受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来预测抑郁。结果:16.1%的病例和6.6%的对照组出现抑郁(p = 0.05),不同程度的TBI患者无显著差异(12.9-18.3%;p = .17)。以年龄、教育程度、TBI严重程度和RPQ-D为预测因子的LR模型以年龄和RPQ-D为显著预测因子显著。该模型对87.9%的参与者进行了正确分类。ROC曲线下面积为0.86。最佳临界值为RPQ-D≥2。结论:单项抑郁筛查对50岁及以上有创伤性脑损伤病史的成年人适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-Item Screening for Depression in Adults (50+) with History of Traumatic Brain Injury.

Background: Single-item depression screening has shown utility in young adult samples with limited work focused on individuals 50 and older. We examined single-item depression screening in adults 50 and older with a history of TBI one year post-injury.

Method: This project involved secondary analysis of deidentified TRACK-TBI data. The sample (N = 508) included 61 control participants and 447 cases grouped by TBI severity. Outcome measures included the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 depression scale (BSI-D) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Depression was determined psychometrically by BSI-D (≥63 T) and PHQ-9 (≥10) if either score was above the cutoff. The Rivermead Postconcussion Symptoms Questionnaire depression item (RPQ-D) was used in logistic regression (LR) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to predict depression.

Results: Depression was observed in 16.1% of cases and 6.6% of control participants (p = .05) with non-significant variability across TBI severity (12.9-18.3%; p = .17). The LR model with age, education, TBI severity, and RPQ-D as predictors was significant with age and RPQ-D as significant predictors. The model classified 87.9% of participants correctly. The area under the ROC curve was 0.86. The optimal cutoff was RPQ-D ≥ 2.

Conclusion: Single-item screening for depression is a suitable approach in adults 50 and older with a history of TBI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
358
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信