基于实际气体泄漏率方程状态的套管持续压力评估

IF 3.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Jieli Wang, Xuelin Dong, Deli Gao
{"title":"基于实际气体泄漏率方程状态的套管持续压力评估","authors":"Jieli Wang,&nbsp;Xuelin Dong,&nbsp;Deli Gao","doi":"10.1002/ese3.2076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gas leakage is one of the most concerning issues in wells for exploring conventional or unconventional oil and gas reservoirs, carbon sequestration, and geothermal energy. Wellbore barriers, such as tubing, casing, and cement, are the primary components that prevent the undesirable flow of subsurface fluids. However, due to the complexity of the operating condition in a harsh environment, the tubing integrity is prone to failure, causing gas leakage and forming a sustained casing pressure (SCP) at the wellhead. This work proposes a prediction model considering the real gas effect when evaluating SCP. The proposed model involves gas flow, leakage, and accumulation in the wellbore. With the pressure and temperature obtained by the flow equations as boundaries, the model estimates the gas flow rate at the leakage point and SCP. Subsequently, comparing the current leakage model with the conventional method demonstrates the model's performance. Finally, the current model is applied to an ultra-deep well to determine the leakage location by inversion. Further sensitivity studies reveal the influences of wellbore conditions on SCP, including the production rate, depth of liquid level, and annular fluid density. The study indicates that the traditional method based on ideal gas underestimates the mass flow rate by approximately 22% compared to the current model. When the adiabatic index of the conventional method is approximated as the isentropic coefficient, the mass flow rate may agree well with the current model. It is acceptable to predict the leakage flow rate by assuming that the production gas is pure methane and ignoring the influence of gas composition. The leakage position is the most influential factor for SCP. These results would help engineers predict SCP and determine the leakage location in wells.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"13 3","pages":"1425-1438"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.2076","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustained Casing Pressure Assessment Based on Gas Leakage Rate by the State of Equation for Real Gas\",\"authors\":\"Jieli Wang,&nbsp;Xuelin Dong,&nbsp;Deli Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ese3.2076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Gas leakage is one of the most concerning issues in wells for exploring conventional or unconventional oil and gas reservoirs, carbon sequestration, and geothermal energy. Wellbore barriers, such as tubing, casing, and cement, are the primary components that prevent the undesirable flow of subsurface fluids. However, due to the complexity of the operating condition in a harsh environment, the tubing integrity is prone to failure, causing gas leakage and forming a sustained casing pressure (SCP) at the wellhead. This work proposes a prediction model considering the real gas effect when evaluating SCP. The proposed model involves gas flow, leakage, and accumulation in the wellbore. With the pressure and temperature obtained by the flow equations as boundaries, the model estimates the gas flow rate at the leakage point and SCP. Subsequently, comparing the current leakage model with the conventional method demonstrates the model's performance. Finally, the current model is applied to an ultra-deep well to determine the leakage location by inversion. Further sensitivity studies reveal the influences of wellbore conditions on SCP, including the production rate, depth of liquid level, and annular fluid density. The study indicates that the traditional method based on ideal gas underestimates the mass flow rate by approximately 22% compared to the current model. When the adiabatic index of the conventional method is approximated as the isentropic coefficient, the mass flow rate may agree well with the current model. It is acceptable to predict the leakage flow rate by assuming that the production gas is pure methane and ignoring the influence of gas composition. The leakage position is the most influential factor for SCP. These results would help engineers predict SCP and determine the leakage location in wells.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"1425-1438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.2076\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.2076\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.2076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在常规或非常规油气储层、碳封存和地热能勘探中,天然气泄漏是最受关注的问题之一。井筒屏障,如油管、套管和水泥,是防止地下流体不良流动的主要组成部分。然而,由于恶劣环境下作业条件的复杂性,油管完整性容易失效,导致气体泄漏,并在井口形成持续套管压力(SCP)。本文提出了一种在评价SCP时考虑实际气体效应的预测模型。所提出的模型涉及井筒中的气体流动、泄漏和积聚。该模型以流动方程得到的压力和温度为边界,估算了泄漏点处的气体流量和SCP。通过与传统方法的比较,验证了模型的性能。最后,将该模型应用于某超深井,通过反演确定泄漏位置。进一步的敏感性研究揭示了井眼条件对SCP的影响,包括产量、液面深度和环空流体密度。研究表明,基于理想气体的传统方法比现有模型低估了约22%的质量流量。当将传统方法的绝热指数近似为等熵系数时,质量流量可以很好地与现有模型相吻合。假设生产气体为纯甲烷,忽略气体成分的影响,预测泄漏流量是可以接受的。泄漏位置是影响SCP发生的主要因素。这些结果将有助于工程师预测SCP并确定井中的泄漏位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sustained Casing Pressure Assessment Based on Gas Leakage Rate by the State of Equation for Real Gas

Sustained Casing Pressure Assessment Based on Gas Leakage Rate by the State of Equation for Real Gas

Gas leakage is one of the most concerning issues in wells for exploring conventional or unconventional oil and gas reservoirs, carbon sequestration, and geothermal energy. Wellbore barriers, such as tubing, casing, and cement, are the primary components that prevent the undesirable flow of subsurface fluids. However, due to the complexity of the operating condition in a harsh environment, the tubing integrity is prone to failure, causing gas leakage and forming a sustained casing pressure (SCP) at the wellhead. This work proposes a prediction model considering the real gas effect when evaluating SCP. The proposed model involves gas flow, leakage, and accumulation in the wellbore. With the pressure and temperature obtained by the flow equations as boundaries, the model estimates the gas flow rate at the leakage point and SCP. Subsequently, comparing the current leakage model with the conventional method demonstrates the model's performance. Finally, the current model is applied to an ultra-deep well to determine the leakage location by inversion. Further sensitivity studies reveal the influences of wellbore conditions on SCP, including the production rate, depth of liquid level, and annular fluid density. The study indicates that the traditional method based on ideal gas underestimates the mass flow rate by approximately 22% compared to the current model. When the adiabatic index of the conventional method is approximated as the isentropic coefficient, the mass flow rate may agree well with the current model. It is acceptable to predict the leakage flow rate by assuming that the production gas is pure methane and ignoring the influence of gas composition. The leakage position is the most influential factor for SCP. These results would help engineers predict SCP and determine the leakage location in wells.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Science & Engineering
Energy Science & Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
298
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信