重新包装土壤样品的收缩分析可以量化土壤的潜在物理质量

Cédric Deluz, Alyssa Deluz, Thomas Keller, Sebastian Doetterl, Pascal Boivin
{"title":"重新包装土壤样品的收缩分析可以量化土壤的潜在物理质量","authors":"Cédric Deluz,&nbsp;Alyssa Deluz,&nbsp;Thomas Keller,&nbsp;Sebastian Doetterl,&nbsp;Pascal Boivin","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper investigates the physical properties of soil samples repacked from aggregate beds and the potential for retrieving representative soil pore properties at the field scale based on shrinkage analysis of a repacked composite sample. This approach was tested on 60 arable fields in Switzerland presenting a large range of soil organic carbon (SOC) and texture. Soil cores constituted from composite samples were repacked at the observed field bulk density. Their pore properties were compared to undisturbed soil samples from the same fields. The soil pore properties were characterized using shrinkage analysis and correlated to soil texture and SOC. The repacking protocol successfully recreated structured samples. The &lt;40-µm equivalent diameter pore and structural pore size distributions were comparable to those of the undisturbed soils. For pores &gt;40 µm, a larger porosity was measured for repacked samples compared to undisturbed ones, limiting the approach to assess the structure and dynamics of larger soil pores. Furthermore, soil clay content as well as SOC were strong predictors for the samples’ physical properties including pore space. The increase in structural porosity in the repacked sample was inversely proportional to the structural porosity already present in the undisturbed samples. Steeper regression slopes of the pore volume to SOC or clay relationship were observed for the repacked samples. These slope changes were comparable to those observed in soil structure restoration experiments and opposite to those observed in soil compaction trials. We conclude that repacking soil from a composite sample allows us to characterize the potential soil structure condition with respect to its SOC and clay content. The method can be used to assess soil structure quality in response to changes in soil management.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70033","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shrinkage analysis of repacked soil samples enables quantifying the soil's potential physical quality\",\"authors\":\"Cédric Deluz,&nbsp;Alyssa Deluz,&nbsp;Thomas Keller,&nbsp;Sebastian Doetterl,&nbsp;Pascal Boivin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/saj2.70033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper investigates the physical properties of soil samples repacked from aggregate beds and the potential for retrieving representative soil pore properties at the field scale based on shrinkage analysis of a repacked composite sample. This approach was tested on 60 arable fields in Switzerland presenting a large range of soil organic carbon (SOC) and texture. Soil cores constituted from composite samples were repacked at the observed field bulk density. Their pore properties were compared to undisturbed soil samples from the same fields. The soil pore properties were characterized using shrinkage analysis and correlated to soil texture and SOC. The repacking protocol successfully recreated structured samples. The &lt;40-µm equivalent diameter pore and structural pore size distributions were comparable to those of the undisturbed soils. For pores &gt;40 µm, a larger porosity was measured for repacked samples compared to undisturbed ones, limiting the approach to assess the structure and dynamics of larger soil pores. Furthermore, soil clay content as well as SOC were strong predictors for the samples’ physical properties including pore space. The increase in structural porosity in the repacked sample was inversely proportional to the structural porosity already present in the undisturbed samples. Steeper regression slopes of the pore volume to SOC or clay relationship were observed for the repacked samples. These slope changes were comparable to those observed in soil structure restoration experiments and opposite to those observed in soil compaction trials. We conclude that repacking soil from a composite sample allows us to characterize the potential soil structure condition with respect to its SOC and clay content. The method can be used to assess soil structure quality in response to changes in soil management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"volume\":\"89 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70033\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.70033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.70033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了从骨料层中重新包装的土壤样品的物理性质,以及基于重新包装的复合材料样品的收缩分析在现场尺度上检索具有代表性的土壤孔隙特性的潜力。该方法在瑞士的60块可耕地上进行了测试,呈现出大范围的土壤有机碳(SOC)和质地。按观察到的现场容重对复合样品构成的土芯进行重新包装。将它们的孔隙特性与来自相同田地的未受干扰的土壤样品进行比较。利用收缩分析对土壤孔隙特性进行表征,并与土壤质地和有机碳相关联。重新包装协议成功地重建了结构化样品。40-µm等效孔径和结构孔径分布与未扰动土壤相当。对于孔隙>;40µm,与未受干扰的样品相比,重新包装的样品测量到更大的孔隙率,限制了评估较大土壤孔隙结构和动力学的方法。此外,粘土含量和有机碳是样品物理性质(包括孔隙空间)的有力预测因子。重新包装样品中结构孔隙度的增加与未扰动样品中已经存在的结构孔隙度成反比。重新包装样品的孔隙体积与有机碳或粘土关系的回归斜率更陡。这些坡度变化与土壤结构恢复试验中观察到的结果相当,与土壤压实试验中观察到的结果相反。我们的结论是,从复合样品中重新包装土壤使我们能够表征其有机碳和粘土含量方面的潜在土壤结构状况。该方法可用于评价土壤结构质量对土壤管理变化的响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Shrinkage analysis of repacked soil samples enables quantifying the soil's potential physical quality

Shrinkage analysis of repacked soil samples enables quantifying the soil's potential physical quality

Shrinkage analysis of repacked soil samples enables quantifying the soil's potential physical quality

Shrinkage analysis of repacked soil samples enables quantifying the soil's potential physical quality

This paper investigates the physical properties of soil samples repacked from aggregate beds and the potential for retrieving representative soil pore properties at the field scale based on shrinkage analysis of a repacked composite sample. This approach was tested on 60 arable fields in Switzerland presenting a large range of soil organic carbon (SOC) and texture. Soil cores constituted from composite samples were repacked at the observed field bulk density. Their pore properties were compared to undisturbed soil samples from the same fields. The soil pore properties were characterized using shrinkage analysis and correlated to soil texture and SOC. The repacking protocol successfully recreated structured samples. The <40-µm equivalent diameter pore and structural pore size distributions were comparable to those of the undisturbed soils. For pores >40 µm, a larger porosity was measured for repacked samples compared to undisturbed ones, limiting the approach to assess the structure and dynamics of larger soil pores. Furthermore, soil clay content as well as SOC were strong predictors for the samples’ physical properties including pore space. The increase in structural porosity in the repacked sample was inversely proportional to the structural porosity already present in the undisturbed samples. Steeper regression slopes of the pore volume to SOC or clay relationship were observed for the repacked samples. These slope changes were comparable to those observed in soil structure restoration experiments and opposite to those observed in soil compaction trials. We conclude that repacking soil from a composite sample allows us to characterize the potential soil structure condition with respect to its SOC and clay content. The method can be used to assess soil structure quality in response to changes in soil management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信