加压回转工艺的优化设计:孔口高度对生产率和纤维形态的影响

IF 4.2 3区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ahmed Alneyadi, Angelo Delbusso, Anthony Harker, Mohan Edirisinghe
{"title":"加压回转工艺的优化设计:孔口高度对生产率和纤维形态的影响","authors":"Ahmed Alneyadi,&nbsp;Angelo Delbusso,&nbsp;Anthony Harker,&nbsp;Mohan Edirisinghe","doi":"10.1002/mame.202400317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Electrospinning and pressurized gyration are two widely adopted methods for polymeric fiber production, valued for their simplicity, versatility, and relatively low environmental impact. Despite its advantages, electrospinning has notable limitations, including low production efficiency and significant safety concerns. Pressurized gyration, however, offers greater productivity and a safer, more sustainable process, making it an excellent candidate for industrial scaling. To fully realize this potential, optimizing the pressurized gyration process is essential for enhancing efficiency and achieving sustainable large-scale fiber production. In this study, the effects of vessel orifice height on the production rate and fiber morphology in pressurized gyration are explored. A series of experiments is conducted using a 15 wt.% polycaprolactone (PCL) solution, with vessels of identical diameter but differing orifice heights 7.5, 15, and 22.5 mm tested under pressures of 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 MPa, all at a constant rotational speed of 13 000 rpm. The 7.5 mm orifice height demonstrates the highest production rate under pressure while increasing orifice height led to finer fiber diameters, better alignment, and smaller beads. These findings underscore the importance of optimizing vessel design, along with process and solution parameters, for scaling up pressurized gyration fiber manufacturing to meet industrial demands.</p>","PeriodicalId":18151,"journal":{"name":"Macromolecular Materials and Engineering","volume":"310 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mame.202400317","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design Optimization of Pressurized Gyration Technology: Orifice Height Level Effects on Production Rate and Fiber Morphology\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Alneyadi,&nbsp;Angelo Delbusso,&nbsp;Anthony Harker,&nbsp;Mohan Edirisinghe\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mame.202400317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Electrospinning and pressurized gyration are two widely adopted methods for polymeric fiber production, valued for their simplicity, versatility, and relatively low environmental impact. Despite its advantages, electrospinning has notable limitations, including low production efficiency and significant safety concerns. Pressurized gyration, however, offers greater productivity and a safer, more sustainable process, making it an excellent candidate for industrial scaling. To fully realize this potential, optimizing the pressurized gyration process is essential for enhancing efficiency and achieving sustainable large-scale fiber production. In this study, the effects of vessel orifice height on the production rate and fiber morphology in pressurized gyration are explored. A series of experiments is conducted using a 15 wt.% polycaprolactone (PCL) solution, with vessels of identical diameter but differing orifice heights 7.5, 15, and 22.5 mm tested under pressures of 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 MPa, all at a constant rotational speed of 13 000 rpm. The 7.5 mm orifice height demonstrates the highest production rate under pressure while increasing orifice height led to finer fiber diameters, better alignment, and smaller beads. These findings underscore the importance of optimizing vessel design, along with process and solution parameters, for scaling up pressurized gyration fiber manufacturing to meet industrial demands.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Macromolecular Materials and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"310 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mame.202400317\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Macromolecular Materials and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mame.202400317\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macromolecular Materials and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mame.202400317","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

静电纺丝和加压旋转是两种广泛采用的生产聚合纤维的方法,其简单、多用途和对环境的影响相对较小。尽管静电纺丝有很多优点,但它也有明显的局限性,包括生产效率低和严重的安全问题。然而,加压旋转提供了更高的生产率和更安全、更可持续的过程,使其成为工业规模的绝佳候选。为了充分发挥这一潜力,优化加压旋转过程对于提高效率和实现可持续的大规模纤维生产至关重要。本研究探讨了加压旋转中孔口高度对生产速率和纤维形态的影响。使用15wt .%的聚己内酯(PCL)溶液进行了一系列实验,在0、0.1、0.2和0.3 MPa的压力下,使用相同直径但不同孔高7.5、15和22.5 mm的容器进行了测试,所有这些都在13000 rpm的恒定转速下进行。在压力下,7.5 mm的孔高显示出最高的产量,而增加孔高可以获得更细的纤维直径、更好的排列和更小的珠粒。这些发现强调了优化容器设计以及工艺和溶液参数的重要性,以扩大加压旋转纤维制造以满足工业需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Design Optimization of Pressurized Gyration Technology: Orifice Height Level Effects on Production Rate and Fiber Morphology

Design Optimization of Pressurized Gyration Technology: Orifice Height Level Effects on Production Rate and Fiber Morphology

Electrospinning and pressurized gyration are two widely adopted methods for polymeric fiber production, valued for their simplicity, versatility, and relatively low environmental impact. Despite its advantages, electrospinning has notable limitations, including low production efficiency and significant safety concerns. Pressurized gyration, however, offers greater productivity and a safer, more sustainable process, making it an excellent candidate for industrial scaling. To fully realize this potential, optimizing the pressurized gyration process is essential for enhancing efficiency and achieving sustainable large-scale fiber production. In this study, the effects of vessel orifice height on the production rate and fiber morphology in pressurized gyration are explored. A series of experiments is conducted using a 15 wt.% polycaprolactone (PCL) solution, with vessels of identical diameter but differing orifice heights 7.5, 15, and 22.5 mm tested under pressures of 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 MPa, all at a constant rotational speed of 13 000 rpm. The 7.5 mm orifice height demonstrates the highest production rate under pressure while increasing orifice height led to finer fiber diameters, better alignment, and smaller beads. These findings underscore the importance of optimizing vessel design, along with process and solution parameters, for scaling up pressurized gyration fiber manufacturing to meet industrial demands.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Macromolecular Materials and Engineering
Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
328
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Macromolecular Materials and Engineering is the high-quality polymer science journal dedicated to the design, modification, characterization, processing and application of advanced polymeric materials, including membranes, sensors, sustainability, composites, fibers, foams, 3D printing, actuators as well as energy and electronic applications. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering is among the top journals publishing original research in polymer science. The journal presents strictly peer-reviewed Research Articles, Reviews, Perspectives and Comments. ISSN: 1438-7492 (print). 1439-2054 (online). Readership:Polymer scientists, chemists, physicists, materials scientists, engineers Abstracting and Indexing Information: CAS: Chemical Abstracts Service (ACS) CCR Database (Clarivate Analytics) Chemical Abstracts Service/SciFinder (ACS) Chemistry Server Reaction Center (Clarivate Analytics) ChemWeb (ChemIndustry.com) Chimica Database (Elsevier) COMPENDEX (Elsevier) Current Contents: Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences (Clarivate Analytics) Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) INSPEC (IET) Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics) Materials Science & Engineering Database (ProQuest) PASCAL Database (INIST/CNRS) Polymer Library (iSmithers RAPRA) Reaction Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics) Science Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics) Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate Analytics) SciTech Premium Collection (ProQuest) SCOPUS (Elsevier) Technology Collection (ProQuest) Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信