为共同创造做准备：从苏格兰中小企业久坐行为案例研究中规划共同创造倡议的路线图-健康级联研究

IF 3.9 3区医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

Public Health Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2025.02.036

Mira Vogelsang , Lauren McCaffrey , Gemma C. Ryde , Maïté Verloigne , Philippa Dall

{"title":"为共同创造做准备：从苏格兰中小企业久坐行为案例研究中规划共同创造倡议的路线图-健康级联研究","authors":"Mira Vogelsang , Lauren McCaffrey , Gemma C. Ryde , Maïté Verloigne , Philippa Dall","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.02.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Co-creation is recognised as a promising approach for addressing complex health issues by collaborating with end-users to develop tailored solutions that meet their needs. Planning a co-creation initiative–resulting in a co-creation protocol–requires balancing between providing clear project details and the need for flexibility in co-creation. However, existing structured guidance necessary for effective co-creation planning in the literature does not exist. This study aimed to develop a practical co-creation planning roadmap for public health researchers and practitioners.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Iterative development of an evidence-based co-creation planning roadmap based on case study reflections and expert input, and supported by existing co-creation literature.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The roadmap was developed based on the experience of applying the PRODUCES framework and principles of the planning phase by Leask and colleagues (2019) for planning a co-creation case study on reducing sedentary behaviour in Scottish companies. The roadmap underwent several rounds of iteration with the research team, incorporated feedback from researchers experienced with co-creation, and was further supported by the established evidence base of co-creation literature.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The resulting roadmap has a seven-step approach, divided into four sections, involving: whether and why co-creation is an appropriate approach, framing the co-creation initiative (Section 1: Identify), defining stakeholders and co-creator sampling, describing resources and outcomes (Section 2: Define), structuring co-creation sessions, selecting methods for the co-creation sessions (Section 3: Structure) and planning for evaluation (Section 4: Plan Evaluation).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The roadmap offers a structured and accessible process to guide the planning of co-creation initiatives. We suggest that the roadmap be applied to different contexts to further refine and validate its utility, with the ultimate goal of enhancing the systematic planning of co-creation in public health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"242 ","pages":"Pages 157-164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preparing for Co-Creation: A roadmap for planning a co-creation initiative from a case study on sedentary behaviour in Scottish SMEs – A health CASCADE study\",\"authors\":\"Mira Vogelsang , Lauren McCaffrey , Gemma C. Ryde , Maïté Verloigne , Philippa Dall\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.02.036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Co-creation is recognised as a promising approach for addressing complex health issues by collaborating with end-users to develop tailored solutions that meet their needs. Planning a co-creation initiative–resulting in a co-creation protocol–requires balancing between providing clear project details and the need for flexibility in co-creation. However, existing structured guidance necessary for effective co-creation planning in the literature does not exist. This study aimed to develop a practical co-creation planning roadmap for public health researchers and practitioners.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Iterative development of an evidence-based co-creation planning roadmap based on case study reflections and expert input, and supported by existing co-creation literature.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The roadmap was developed based on the experience of applying the PRODUCES framework and principles of the planning phase by Leask and colleagues (2019) for planning a co-creation case study on reducing sedentary behaviour in Scottish companies. The roadmap underwent several rounds of iteration with the research team, incorporated feedback from researchers experienced with co-creation, and was further supported by the established evidence base of co-creation literature.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The resulting roadmap has a seven-step approach, divided into four sections, involving: whether and why co-creation is an appropriate approach, framing the co-creation initiative (Section 1: Identify), defining stakeholders and co-creator sampling, describing resources and outcomes (Section 2: Define), structuring co-creation sessions, selecting methods for the co-creation sessions (Section 3: Structure) and planning for evaluation (Section 4: Plan Evaluation).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The roadmap offers a structured and accessible process to guide the planning of co-creation initiatives. We suggest that the roadmap be applied to different contexts to further refine and validate its utility, with the ultimate goal of enhancing the systematic planning of co-creation in public health.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health\",\"volume\":\"242 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 157-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003335062500109X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003335062500109X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

通过与最终用户合作制定满足其需求的量身定制的解决方案，创造生态目标被认为是解决复杂健康问题的一种有希望的方法。计划一个共同创造的计划——产生一个共同创造的协议——需要在提供清晰的项目细节和共同创造的灵活性之间取得平衡。然而，文献中不存在有效的共同创造规划所需的现有结构化指导。本研究旨在为公共卫生研究人员和从业人员制定实用的共同创造规划路线图。研究设计基于案例研究反思和专家意见，在现有共同创造文献的支持下，迭代开发基于证据的共同创造规划路线图。该路线图是根据Leask及其同事（2019年）应用PRODUCES框架和规划阶段原则的经验制定的，用于规划苏格兰公司减少久坐行为的共同创造案例研究。该路线图经过了研究团队的几轮迭代，纳入了有共同创造经验的研究人员的反馈，并得到了共同创造文献的进一步支持。由此产生的路线图有一个七步方法，分为四个部分，涉及：共同创造是否是以及为什么是一种合适的方法，框架共同创造倡议（第1节：识别），定义利益相关者和共同创造者样本，描述资源和结果（第2节：定义），构建共同创造会议，选择共同创造会议的方法（第3节：结构）和规划评估（第4节：计划评估）。该路线图提供了一个结构化的、可访问的流程来指导共同创造计划的规划。我们建议将该路线图应用于不同的环境，以进一步完善和验证其效用，最终目标是加强公共卫生领域共同创造的系统规划。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Preparing for Co-Creation: A roadmap for planning a co-creation initiative from a case study on sedentary behaviour in Scottish SMEs – A health CASCADE study

Objective

Co-creation is recognised as a promising approach for addressing complex health issues by collaborating with end-users to develop tailored solutions that meet their needs. Planning a co-creation initiative–resulting in a co-creation protocol–requires balancing between providing clear project details and the need for flexibility in co-creation. However, existing structured guidance necessary for effective co-creation planning in the literature does not exist. This study aimed to develop a practical co-creation planning roadmap for public health researchers and practitioners.

Study design

Iterative development of an evidence-based co-creation planning roadmap based on case study reflections and expert input, and supported by existing co-creation literature.

Methods

The roadmap was developed based on the experience of applying the PRODUCES framework and principles of the planning phase by Leask and colleagues (2019) for planning a co-creation case study on reducing sedentary behaviour in Scottish companies. The roadmap underwent several rounds of iteration with the research team, incorporated feedback from researchers experienced with co-creation, and was further supported by the established evidence base of co-creation literature.

Results

The resulting roadmap has a seven-step approach, divided into four sections, involving: whether and why co-creation is an appropriate approach, framing the co-creation initiative (Section 1: Identify), defining stakeholders and co-creator sampling, describing resources and outcomes (Section 2: Define), structuring co-creation sessions, selecting methods for the co-creation sessions (Section 3: Structure) and planning for evaluation (Section 4: Plan Evaluation).

Conclusion

The roadmap offers a structured and accessible process to guide the planning of co-creation initiatives. We suggest that the roadmap be applied to different contexts to further refine and validate its utility, with the ultimate goal of enhancing the systematic planning of co-creation in public health.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore

7.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

280

审稿时长

37 days

期刊介绍： Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.