钢筋混凝土结构统一有限元极限分析

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS
Peter Noe Poulsen, John Forbes Olesen
{"title":"钢筋混凝土结构统一有限元极限分析","authors":"Peter Noe Poulsen,&nbsp;John Forbes Olesen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2025.113307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The application of Limit Analysis is effective in the pursuit of the collapse load of a structure. So far, whether it is an analytical model or a numerical model, the choice has been to apply either the lower or the upper bound theorem. Here, a unified approach for solid Finite Element models has eliminated this distinction and there is only one shared optimal solution. The unified solution is based on the two theorems by applying coinciding constitutive points for the fulfilment of the yield criteria together with weak forms of the equilibrium and the compatibility demands in the lower and upper bound formulation, respectively. This approach applies to any 3D stress state which may be formulated as a Semidefinite Program. Models based on either the lower or the upper bound theorem often give an indistinct result for the dual solution, interpreted as the displacements or the stresses, respectively. The present unified mixed solution renders accurate results for both stresses, displacements and load levels which in general are more accurate than the corresponding strict lower and upper bound solutions. A tetrahedral solid element with a linear stress variation and a quadratic displacement interpolation is presented along with a compatible embedded bar element. The effectiveness of this implementation is shown in three examples with regards to stresses, displacements, plastic work and the load capacity of reinforced concrete structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14311,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Solids and Structures","volume":"314 ","pages":"Article 113307"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unified finite element limit analysis for solid reinforced concrete structures\",\"authors\":\"Peter Noe Poulsen,&nbsp;John Forbes Olesen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2025.113307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The application of Limit Analysis is effective in the pursuit of the collapse load of a structure. So far, whether it is an analytical model or a numerical model, the choice has been to apply either the lower or the upper bound theorem. Here, a unified approach for solid Finite Element models has eliminated this distinction and there is only one shared optimal solution. The unified solution is based on the two theorems by applying coinciding constitutive points for the fulfilment of the yield criteria together with weak forms of the equilibrium and the compatibility demands in the lower and upper bound formulation, respectively. This approach applies to any 3D stress state which may be formulated as a Semidefinite Program. Models based on either the lower or the upper bound theorem often give an indistinct result for the dual solution, interpreted as the displacements or the stresses, respectively. The present unified mixed solution renders accurate results for both stresses, displacements and load levels which in general are more accurate than the corresponding strict lower and upper bound solutions. A tetrahedral solid element with a linear stress variation and a quadratic displacement interpolation is presented along with a compatible embedded bar element. The effectiveness of this implementation is shown in three examples with regards to stresses, displacements, plastic work and the load capacity of reinforced concrete structures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Solids and Structures\",\"volume\":\"314 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Solids and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020768325000939\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Solids and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020768325000939","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

极限分析的应用对结构倒塌荷载的求解是有效的。到目前为止,无论是解析模型还是数值模型,选择都是应用下界定理或上界定理。在这里,实体有限元模型的统一方法消除了这种区别,只有一个共享的最优解。统一解是基于两个定理,分别应用满足屈服准则的重合本构点以及平衡的弱形式和上界公式中的相容性要求。这种方法适用于任何三维应力状态,它可以被表述为半确定程序。基于下界定理或上界定理的模型通常给出对偶解的模糊结果,分别解释为位移或应力。目前的统一混合解对应力、位移和荷载水平都给出了准确的结果,通常比相应的严格下界和上界解更准确。提出了一种具有线性应力变化和二次位移插值的四面体实体单元以及一种兼容的嵌入式杆单元。在钢筋混凝土结构的应力、位移、塑性功和承载能力方面,通过三个实例证明了这种方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unified finite element limit analysis for solid reinforced concrete structures
The application of Limit Analysis is effective in the pursuit of the collapse load of a structure. So far, whether it is an analytical model or a numerical model, the choice has been to apply either the lower or the upper bound theorem. Here, a unified approach for solid Finite Element models has eliminated this distinction and there is only one shared optimal solution. The unified solution is based on the two theorems by applying coinciding constitutive points for the fulfilment of the yield criteria together with weak forms of the equilibrium and the compatibility demands in the lower and upper bound formulation, respectively. This approach applies to any 3D stress state which may be formulated as a Semidefinite Program. Models based on either the lower or the upper bound theorem often give an indistinct result for the dual solution, interpreted as the displacements or the stresses, respectively. The present unified mixed solution renders accurate results for both stresses, displacements and load levels which in general are more accurate than the corresponding strict lower and upper bound solutions. A tetrahedral solid element with a linear stress variation and a quadratic displacement interpolation is presented along with a compatible embedded bar element. The effectiveness of this implementation is shown in three examples with regards to stresses, displacements, plastic work and the load capacity of reinforced concrete structures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
405
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Solids and Structures has as its objective the publication and dissemination of original research in Mechanics of Solids and Structures as a field of Applied Science and Engineering. It fosters thus the exchange of ideas among workers in different parts of the world and also among workers who emphasize different aspects of the foundations and applications of the field. Standing as it does at the cross-roads of Materials Science, Life Sciences, Mathematics, Physics and Engineering Design, the Mechanics of Solids and Structures is experiencing considerable growth as a result of recent technological advances. The Journal, by providing an international medium of communication, is encouraging this growth and is encompassing all aspects of the field from the more classical problems of structural analysis to mechanics of solids continually interacting with other media and including fracture, flow, wave propagation, heat transfer, thermal effects in solids, optimum design methods, model analysis, structural topology and numerical techniques. Interest extends to both inorganic and organic solids and structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信