过渡金属化合物的自动多参考垂直激励

IF 2.8 2区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Jacob J. Wardzala, Daniel S. King and Laura Gagliardi*, 
{"title":"过渡金属化合物的自动多参考垂直激励","authors":"Jacob J. Wardzala,&nbsp;Daniel S. King and Laura Gagliardi*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpca.4c0859710.1021/acs.jpca.4c08597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Excited states of transition metal complexes are generally strongly correlated due to the near-degeneracy of the metal d orbitals. Consequently, electronic structure calculations of such species often necessitate multireference approaches. However, widespread use of multireference methods is hindered due to the active space selection problem, which has historically required system-specific chemical knowledge and a trial-and-error approach. Here, we address this issue with an automated method combining the approximate pair coefficient (APC) scheme for estimating orbital entropies with the discrete variational selection (DVS) approach for evaluating active space quality. We apply DVS-APC to the calculation of 67 vertical excitations in transition metal diatomics as well as to two larger complexes. We show DVS-APC generated active spaces yield NEVPT2 mean absolute errors of 0.18 eV, in line with previous accuracies obtained for organic systems, but larger than errors achieved with hand-selected active spaces (0.14 eV). If instead of using DVS we identify the best results from our trial wave functions, we find improved performance (mean absolute error of 0.1 eV) over the manually selected results. We highlight this deviation between DVS and hand selected active spaces as a possible measure of bias introduced when hand selecting active spaces. However, we find that multiconfiguration pair-density functional theory (MC-PDFT) using the tPBE and tPBE0 functionals is roughly 0.15 eV less accurate than NEVPT2 across this class of diatomic systems, potentially accounting for the decreased performance of DVS-APC, which uses MC-PDFT energies to select between active spaces. We also showcase an ability to “down-sample” the DVS-APC wave functions using natural orbital occupancies to achieve smaller minimal active spaces which retain the accuracy of the larger starting active spaces. Finally, DVS-APC and tPBE0 are proven to be effective when applied to modeling excited states in two larger transition metal complexes, suggesting that the transition metal diatomics may be a particular outstanding challenge for DVS-APC and MC-PDFT approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":59,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A","volume":"129 10","pages":"2683–2691 2683–2691"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated Multireference Vertical Excitations for Transition-Metal Compounds\",\"authors\":\"Jacob J. Wardzala,&nbsp;Daniel S. King and Laura Gagliardi*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jpca.4c0859710.1021/acs.jpca.4c08597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Excited states of transition metal complexes are generally strongly correlated due to the near-degeneracy of the metal d orbitals. Consequently, electronic structure calculations of such species often necessitate multireference approaches. However, widespread use of multireference methods is hindered due to the active space selection problem, which has historically required system-specific chemical knowledge and a trial-and-error approach. Here, we address this issue with an automated method combining the approximate pair coefficient (APC) scheme for estimating orbital entropies with the discrete variational selection (DVS) approach for evaluating active space quality. We apply DVS-APC to the calculation of 67 vertical excitations in transition metal diatomics as well as to two larger complexes. We show DVS-APC generated active spaces yield NEVPT2 mean absolute errors of 0.18 eV, in line with previous accuracies obtained for organic systems, but larger than errors achieved with hand-selected active spaces (0.14 eV). If instead of using DVS we identify the best results from our trial wave functions, we find improved performance (mean absolute error of 0.1 eV) over the manually selected results. We highlight this deviation between DVS and hand selected active spaces as a possible measure of bias introduced when hand selecting active spaces. However, we find that multiconfiguration pair-density functional theory (MC-PDFT) using the tPBE and tPBE0 functionals is roughly 0.15 eV less accurate than NEVPT2 across this class of diatomic systems, potentially accounting for the decreased performance of DVS-APC, which uses MC-PDFT energies to select between active spaces. We also showcase an ability to “down-sample” the DVS-APC wave functions using natural orbital occupancies to achieve smaller minimal active spaces which retain the accuracy of the larger starting active spaces. Finally, DVS-APC and tPBE0 are proven to be effective when applied to modeling excited states in two larger transition metal complexes, suggesting that the transition metal diatomics may be a particular outstanding challenge for DVS-APC and MC-PDFT approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":59,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A\",\"volume\":\"129 10\",\"pages\":\"2683–2691 2683–2691\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpca.4c08597\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpca.4c08597","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于金属d轨道的近简并,过渡金属配合物的激发态通常是强相关的。因此,这类物质的电子结构计算通常需要多参考方法。然而,由于主动空间选择问题,多参考方法的广泛使用受到阻碍,这在历史上需要系统特定的化学知识和试错方法。在这里,我们使用一种自动化方法来解决这个问题,该方法结合了用于估计轨道熵的近似对系数(APC)方案和用于评估活动空间质量的离散变分选择(DVS)方法。我们将DVS-APC应用于过渡金属双原子和两个较大配合物的67个垂直激发的计算。我们发现,DVS-APC生成的活动空间产生的NEVPT2平均绝对误差为0.18 eV,与以前在有机系统中获得的精度一致,但大于手工选择活动空间所获得的误差(0.14 eV)。如果不使用分布式交换机,我们从试验波函数中识别出最佳结果,我们会发现与手动选择的结果相比,性能有所提高(平均绝对误差为0.1 eV)。我们强调了DVS和手动选择的活动空间之间的这种偏差,作为手动选择活动空间时引入的偏差的可能测量。然而,我们发现,在这类双原子系统中,使用tPBE和tPBE0泛函的多构型对密度泛函理论(MC-PDFT)的精度比NEVPT2低大约0.15 eV,这可能是使用MC-PDFT能量在有源空间之间进行选择的DVS-APC性能下降的原因。我们还展示了利用自然轨道占位对DVS-APC波函数进行“下采样”的能力,以获得更小的最小活动空间,同时保留了更大的起始活动空间的准确性。最后,DVS-APC和tPBE0在模拟两种较大的过渡金属配合物的激发态时被证明是有效的,这表明过渡金属双原子可能是DVS-APC和MC-PDFT方法的一个特别突出的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Automated Multireference Vertical Excitations for Transition-Metal Compounds

Automated Multireference Vertical Excitations for Transition-Metal Compounds

Excited states of transition metal complexes are generally strongly correlated due to the near-degeneracy of the metal d orbitals. Consequently, electronic structure calculations of such species often necessitate multireference approaches. However, widespread use of multireference methods is hindered due to the active space selection problem, which has historically required system-specific chemical knowledge and a trial-and-error approach. Here, we address this issue with an automated method combining the approximate pair coefficient (APC) scheme for estimating orbital entropies with the discrete variational selection (DVS) approach for evaluating active space quality. We apply DVS-APC to the calculation of 67 vertical excitations in transition metal diatomics as well as to two larger complexes. We show DVS-APC generated active spaces yield NEVPT2 mean absolute errors of 0.18 eV, in line with previous accuracies obtained for organic systems, but larger than errors achieved with hand-selected active spaces (0.14 eV). If instead of using DVS we identify the best results from our trial wave functions, we find improved performance (mean absolute error of 0.1 eV) over the manually selected results. We highlight this deviation between DVS and hand selected active spaces as a possible measure of bias introduced when hand selecting active spaces. However, we find that multiconfiguration pair-density functional theory (MC-PDFT) using the tPBE and tPBE0 functionals is roughly 0.15 eV less accurate than NEVPT2 across this class of diatomic systems, potentially accounting for the decreased performance of DVS-APC, which uses MC-PDFT energies to select between active spaces. We also showcase an ability to “down-sample” the DVS-APC wave functions using natural orbital occupancies to achieve smaller minimal active spaces which retain the accuracy of the larger starting active spaces. Finally, DVS-APC and tPBE0 are proven to be effective when applied to modeling excited states in two larger transition metal complexes, suggesting that the transition metal diatomics may be a particular outstanding challenge for DVS-APC and MC-PDFT approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
922
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Chemistry A is devoted to reporting new and original experimental and theoretical basic research of interest to physical chemists, biophysical chemists, and chemical physicists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信