双氯芬酸和庆大霉素对紫贻贝的生态毒理学效应:体内显示而体外未显示的是什么?

IF 7.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Afonso Pereira , Marta Cunha , Alessia Cuccaro , Hugo C. Vieira , Yide He , Amadeu M.V.M. Soares , Rosa Freitas
{"title":"双氯芬酸和庆大霉素对紫贻贝的生态毒理学效应:体内显示而体外未显示的是什么?","authors":"Afonso Pereira ,&nbsp;Marta Cunha ,&nbsp;Alessia Cuccaro ,&nbsp;Hugo C. Vieira ,&nbsp;Yide He ,&nbsp;Amadeu M.V.M. Soares ,&nbsp;Rosa Freitas","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the toxicological effects of diclofenac (DIC) and gentamicin (GEN) on the gills (G) and digestive gland (DG) of <em>Mytilus galloprovincialis</em> through <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> assays. Biochemical markers related to oxidative stress, metabolic capacity, and neurotoxicity were evaluated at the end of each assay. For both assays, principal coordinates analysis (PCO) highlighted distinct biochemical profiles between G and DG, mostly related to higher basal values for several biomarkers in DG.The Integrated Biomarker Response (IBR) index revealed the highest scores in G for the <em>in vitro</em> assay, especially after exposure to GEN. In the <em>in vivo</em> assay, instead, the highest scores were recorded in DG, particularly in response to DIC. The distinct responses of G and DG underscore their respective roles in respiration and detoxification, with G being more sensitive to acute stress and DG exhibiting greater adaptive capacity over time. Furthermore, GEN appeared to cause the greatest impact on G in the <em>in vitro</em> assay, while DIC had the most significant effect on DG following the <em>in vivo</em> experiment. <em>In vitro</em> assays demonstrated limited oxidative stress and cellular damage, while <em>in vivo</em> results highlighted substantial metabolic depression and biomarker variability under prolonged exposure. When analyzed individually, the <em>in vitro</em> assay showed a clearer distinction between the two contaminants, particularly in DG. The findings underscore the differential vulnerability and adaptive capacities of G and DG, attributed to their distinct physiological functions. These results emphasize the complementary nature of <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> approaches, with the former providing mechanistic insights and the latter reflecting systemic organismal responses. This study highlights the importance of a multi-dimensional approach, combining both <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> methodologies, to better understand tissue-specific toxicity and the broader ecological consequences of pharmaceutical contamination.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":311,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution","volume":"372 ","pages":"Article 126045"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ecotoxicological effects of diclofenac and gentamicin on Mytilus galloprovincialis: What does in vivo reveal that in vitro fails to show?\",\"authors\":\"Afonso Pereira ,&nbsp;Marta Cunha ,&nbsp;Alessia Cuccaro ,&nbsp;Hugo C. Vieira ,&nbsp;Yide He ,&nbsp;Amadeu M.V.M. Soares ,&nbsp;Rosa Freitas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigated the toxicological effects of diclofenac (DIC) and gentamicin (GEN) on the gills (G) and digestive gland (DG) of <em>Mytilus galloprovincialis</em> through <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> assays. Biochemical markers related to oxidative stress, metabolic capacity, and neurotoxicity were evaluated at the end of each assay. For both assays, principal coordinates analysis (PCO) highlighted distinct biochemical profiles between G and DG, mostly related to higher basal values for several biomarkers in DG.The Integrated Biomarker Response (IBR) index revealed the highest scores in G for the <em>in vitro</em> assay, especially after exposure to GEN. In the <em>in vivo</em> assay, instead, the highest scores were recorded in DG, particularly in response to DIC. The distinct responses of G and DG underscore their respective roles in respiration and detoxification, with G being more sensitive to acute stress and DG exhibiting greater adaptive capacity over time. Furthermore, GEN appeared to cause the greatest impact on G in the <em>in vitro</em> assay, while DIC had the most significant effect on DG following the <em>in vivo</em> experiment. <em>In vitro</em> assays demonstrated limited oxidative stress and cellular damage, while <em>in vivo</em> results highlighted substantial metabolic depression and biomarker variability under prolonged exposure. When analyzed individually, the <em>in vitro</em> assay showed a clearer distinction between the two contaminants, particularly in DG. The findings underscore the differential vulnerability and adaptive capacities of G and DG, attributed to their distinct physiological functions. These results emphasize the complementary nature of <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> approaches, with the former providing mechanistic insights and the latter reflecting systemic organismal responses. This study highlights the importance of a multi-dimensional approach, combining both <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> methodologies, to better understand tissue-specific toxicity and the broader ecological consequences of pharmaceutical contamination.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Pollution\",\"volume\":\"372 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126045\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Pollution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026974912500418X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026974912500418X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过体外和体内实验研究了双氯芬酸(DIC)和庆大霉素(GEN)对加洛野贻贝(Mytilus galloprovincialis)鳃(G)和消化腺(DG)的毒理学影响。在每次实验结束时评估与氧化应激、代谢能力和神经毒性相关的生化标志物。对于这两种分析,主坐标分析(PCO)突出了G和DG之间不同的生化特征,主要与DG中几种生物标志物的较高基础值有关。综合生物标志物反应(IBR)指数显示,在体外实验中,G的得分更高,特别是在暴露于gen之后。在体内实验中,DG的得分最高,特别是在DIC存在时。G和DG的不同反应强调了它们在呼吸和解毒中的作用,随着时间的推移,G对急性应激更敏感,DG表现出更大的适应能力。此外,体外实验显示GEN对G的影响最大,而体内实验显示DIC对DG的影响最显著。体外实验表明,氧化应激和细胞损伤有限,而体内实验结果显示,在长时间暴露下,代谢抑制和生物标志物变异显著。当单独分析时,体外分析显示两种污染物之间有更明显的区别,特别是在DG中。研究结果强调了G和DG的不同脆弱性和适应能力,归因于它们各自在呼吸和解毒中的作用。这些结果强调了体外和体内方法的互补性,前者提供了机制见解,后者反映了系统的有机体反应。这项研究强调了多维方法的重要性,结合体外和体内方法,以更好地了解组织特异性毒性和药物污染的更广泛的生态后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The ecotoxicological effects of diclofenac and gentamicin on Mytilus galloprovincialis: What does in vivo reveal that in vitro fails to show?

The ecotoxicological effects of diclofenac and gentamicin on Mytilus galloprovincialis: What does in vivo reveal that in vitro fails to show?

The ecotoxicological effects of diclofenac and gentamicin on Mytilus galloprovincialis: What does in vivo reveal that in vitro fails to show?
This study investigated the toxicological effects of diclofenac (DIC) and gentamicin (GEN) on the gills (G) and digestive gland (DG) of Mytilus galloprovincialis through in vitro and in vivo assays. Biochemical markers related to oxidative stress, metabolic capacity, and neurotoxicity were evaluated at the end of each assay. For both assays, principal coordinates analysis (PCO) highlighted distinct biochemical profiles between G and DG, mostly related to higher basal values for several biomarkers in DG.The Integrated Biomarker Response (IBR) index revealed the highest scores in G for the in vitro assay, especially after exposure to GEN. In the in vivo assay, instead, the highest scores were recorded in DG, particularly in response to DIC. The distinct responses of G and DG underscore their respective roles in respiration and detoxification, with G being more sensitive to acute stress and DG exhibiting greater adaptive capacity over time. Furthermore, GEN appeared to cause the greatest impact on G in the in vitro assay, while DIC had the most significant effect on DG following the in vivo experiment. In vitro assays demonstrated limited oxidative stress and cellular damage, while in vivo results highlighted substantial metabolic depression and biomarker variability under prolonged exposure. When analyzed individually, the in vitro assay showed a clearer distinction between the two contaminants, particularly in DG. The findings underscore the differential vulnerability and adaptive capacities of G and DG, attributed to their distinct physiological functions. These results emphasize the complementary nature of in vitro and in vivo approaches, with the former providing mechanistic insights and the latter reflecting systemic organismal responses. This study highlights the importance of a multi-dimensional approach, combining both in vitro and in vivo methodologies, to better understand tissue-specific toxicity and the broader ecological consequences of pharmaceutical contamination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Pollution
Environmental Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2082
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research papers and review articles covering all aspects of environmental pollution and its impacts on ecosystems and human health. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: • Sources and occurrences of pollutants that are clearly defined and measured in environmental compartments, food and food-related items, and human bodies; • Interlinks between contaminant exposure and biological, ecological, and human health effects, including those of climate change; • Contaminants of emerging concerns (including but not limited to antibiotic resistant microorganisms or genes, microplastics/nanoplastics, electronic wastes, light, and noise) and/or their biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Laboratory and field studies on the remediation/mitigation of environmental pollution via new techniques and with clear links to biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Modeling of pollution processes, patterns, or trends that is of clear environmental and/or human health interest; • New techniques that measure and examine environmental occurrences, transport, behavior, and effects of pollutants within the environment or the laboratory, provided that they can be clearly used to address problems within regional or global environmental compartments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信