低语音症和帕金森病患者交流参与的稳定性和日常言语使用水平的探讨。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Allyson D Page, Cynthia Mancinelli, Julie Theurer, Mandar Jog, Scott G Adams
{"title":"低语音症和帕金森病患者交流参与的稳定性和日常言语使用水平的探讨。","authors":"Allyson D Page, Cynthia Mancinelli, Julie Theurer, Mandar Jog, Scott G Adams","doi":"10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This exploratory study evaluated the test-retest stability of three participation-based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) rated by individuals with Parkinson's disease (IWPD), primary communication partners (PCPs) serving as proxy raters, and control participants over three study visits spanning approximately 1 month.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-three IWPD and hypophonia, 23 PCPs, and 30 control participants attended three non-intervention experimental visits. During each visit, all participants completed three participation-based PROMs: Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB), Voice Activity and Participation Profile (VAPP), and Levels of Speech Usage Scale (LSUS). Proxy ratings for each PROM were completed by PCPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated significant differences between IWPD and control participants on all PROMs. IWPD exhibited lower scores on the CPIB and LSUS and higher scores on the VAPP compared to control participants. There was relative agreement in ratings between IWPD and their PCPs on all PROMs. Finally, there were relatively stable test-retest scores on all three PROMs over the three study visits, both within and between IWPD and PCPs. An exception was a statistically, but not clinically significant, decrease in CPIB scores between Visit 1 and Visit 3 for IWPD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has contributed to our understanding of the measurement properties of the CPIB, VAPP, and LSUS related to the test-retest stability of these measures over three time points in IWPD, proxy raters, and control participants. These findings provide additional context in the interpretation of participation-based PROMs in this clinical population and may prove to be useful in interpreting changes to participation-based PROM scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Stability of Communicative Participation and Level of Daily Speech Usage Among Individuals With Hypophonia and Parkinson's Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Allyson D Page, Cynthia Mancinelli, Julie Theurer, Mandar Jog, Scott G Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This exploratory study evaluated the test-retest stability of three participation-based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) rated by individuals with Parkinson's disease (IWPD), primary communication partners (PCPs) serving as proxy raters, and control participants over three study visits spanning approximately 1 month.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-three IWPD and hypophonia, 23 PCPs, and 30 control participants attended three non-intervention experimental visits. During each visit, all participants completed three participation-based PROMs: Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB), Voice Activity and Participation Profile (VAPP), and Levels of Speech Usage Scale (LSUS). Proxy ratings for each PROM were completed by PCPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated significant differences between IWPD and control participants on all PROMs. IWPD exhibited lower scores on the CPIB and LSUS and higher scores on the VAPP compared to control participants. There was relative agreement in ratings between IWPD and their PCPs on all PROMs. Finally, there were relatively stable test-retest scores on all three PROMs over the three study visits, both within and between IWPD and PCPs. An exception was a statistically, but not clinically significant, decrease in CPIB scores between Visit 1 and Visit 3 for IWPD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has contributed to our understanding of the measurement properties of the CPIB, VAPP, and LSUS related to the test-retest stability of these measures over three time points in IWPD, proxy raters, and control participants. These findings provide additional context in the interpretation of participation-based PROMs in this clinical population and may prove to be useful in interpreting changes to participation-based PROM scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00192\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本探索性研究评估了帕金森病患者(IWPD)、主要沟通伙伴(pcp)作为代理评分者和对照组参与者在大约1个月的三次研究访问中评估的三种基于参与者的患者报告结果测量(PROMs)的测试-重测稳定性。方法:23名IWPD伴低音者、23名pcp者和30名对照者参加了3次无干预的实验访视。在每次访问期间,所有参与者都完成了三个基于参与性的PROMs:交际参与项目库(CPIB),语音活动和参与概况(VAPP)和言语使用水平量表(LSUS)。每个PROM的代理评级由pcp完成。结果:结果显示,IWPD组与对照组在所有PROMs上均有显著差异。与对照组相比,IWPD组在CPIB和LSUS上得分较低,在VAPP上得分较高。IWPD和他们的pcp在所有prom上的评分相对一致。最后,在三次研究访问中,在IWPD和pcp内部和之间,所有三个prom的测试重测分数都相对稳定。一个例外是统计上,但没有临床意义,就诊1和就诊3之间IWPD的CPIB评分下降。结论:本研究有助于我们理解CPIB、VAPP和LSUS的测量特性,这些特性与IWPD、代理评分者和对照参与者在三个时间点上的重测稳定性有关。这些发现为临床人群中基于参与性PROM的解释提供了额外的背景,并可能被证明对解释基于参与性PROM分数的变化有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Stability of Communicative Participation and Level of Daily Speech Usage Among Individuals With Hypophonia and Parkinson's Disease.

Purpose: This exploratory study evaluated the test-retest stability of three participation-based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) rated by individuals with Parkinson's disease (IWPD), primary communication partners (PCPs) serving as proxy raters, and control participants over three study visits spanning approximately 1 month.

Method: Twenty-three IWPD and hypophonia, 23 PCPs, and 30 control participants attended three non-intervention experimental visits. During each visit, all participants completed three participation-based PROMs: Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB), Voice Activity and Participation Profile (VAPP), and Levels of Speech Usage Scale (LSUS). Proxy ratings for each PROM were completed by PCPs.

Results: Results indicated significant differences between IWPD and control participants on all PROMs. IWPD exhibited lower scores on the CPIB and LSUS and higher scores on the VAPP compared to control participants. There was relative agreement in ratings between IWPD and their PCPs on all PROMs. Finally, there were relatively stable test-retest scores on all three PROMs over the three study visits, both within and between IWPD and PCPs. An exception was a statistically, but not clinically significant, decrease in CPIB scores between Visit 1 and Visit 3 for IWPD.

Conclusions: This study has contributed to our understanding of the measurement properties of the CPIB, VAPP, and LSUS related to the test-retest stability of these measures over three time points in IWPD, proxy raters, and control participants. These findings provide additional context in the interpretation of participation-based PROMs in this clinical population and may prove to be useful in interpreting changes to participation-based PROM scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
353
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信