术前预防性升高血压以减少胃切除术后出血的疗效分析:倾向评分匹配分析

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Guangxu Zhu, Shengjie Zhou, Qihang Sun, Xuren Lu, Qingshun Zhu, Xin Yin, Lei Yu, Jianjun Qu, Xiaomin Lang
{"title":"术前预防性升高血压以减少胃切除术后出血的疗效分析:倾向评分匹配分析","authors":"Guangxu Zhu, Shengjie Zhou, Qihang Sun, Xuren Lu, Qingshun Zhu, Xin Yin, Lei Yu, Jianjun Qu, Xiaomin Lang","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02826-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of reducing post-gastrectomy hemorrhage by increasing blood pressure at the end of gastric surgery and to evaluate whether this clinical intervention affects the stability of patients' postoperative circulatory system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 499 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy under general anesthesia at our center between January 2023 and January 2024. After 1:1 propensity score matching, the experimental group comprised 157 patients whose operation cavities were examined after increasing blood pressure before the end of gastrectomy, while the control group included 157 patients whose operation cavities were examined using routine procedures without increasing blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidences of total postoperative bleeding (0% vs. 3.82%, P = 0.013) and early postoperative bleeding (0% vs. 2.55%, P = 0.044) were significantly lower in the experimental group compared to the control group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in delayed bleeding (0% vs. 1.23%, P = 0.156), systolic blood pressure immediately upon returning to the ward (121.02 ± 18.196 vs. 120.34 ± 21.664, P = 0.795), systolic blood pressure 48 h post-surgery (125.04 ± 16.242 vs. 126.23 ± 17.048, P = 0.529), diastolic blood pressure immediately upon returning to the ward (83.83 ± 11.978 vs. 84.75 ± 12.422, P = 0.506), diastolic blood pressure 48 h post-surgery (74.69 ± 9.773 vs. 75.76 ± 10.605, P = 0.353), heart rate immediately upon returning to the ward (74.31 ± 11.610 vs. 75.15 ± 11.660, P = 0.522), or heart rate 48 h post-surgery (80.49 ± 12.267 vs. 79.11 ± 10.969, P = 0.293). Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding anastomotic fistula, intestinal obstruction, postoperative pneumonia, reoperation, mortality, combined organ resection, or postoperative hospital stay (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increasing blood pressure before the end of gastrectomy can effectively reduce the incidence of primary postoperative hemorrhage without affecting the stability of the perioperative circulatory system.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the efficacy of a prophylactic increasing blood pressure before the end of surgery to reduce postoperative bleeding after gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Guangxu Zhu, Shengjie Zhou, Qihang Sun, Xuren Lu, Qingshun Zhu, Xin Yin, Lei Yu, Jianjun Qu, Xiaomin Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12893-025-02826-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of reducing post-gastrectomy hemorrhage by increasing blood pressure at the end of gastric surgery and to evaluate whether this clinical intervention affects the stability of patients' postoperative circulatory system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 499 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy under general anesthesia at our center between January 2023 and January 2024. After 1:1 propensity score matching, the experimental group comprised 157 patients whose operation cavities were examined after increasing blood pressure before the end of gastrectomy, while the control group included 157 patients whose operation cavities were examined using routine procedures without increasing blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidences of total postoperative bleeding (0% vs. 3.82%, P = 0.013) and early postoperative bleeding (0% vs. 2.55%, P = 0.044) were significantly lower in the experimental group compared to the control group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in delayed bleeding (0% vs. 1.23%, P = 0.156), systolic blood pressure immediately upon returning to the ward (121.02 ± 18.196 vs. 120.34 ± 21.664, P = 0.795), systolic blood pressure 48 h post-surgery (125.04 ± 16.242 vs. 126.23 ± 17.048, P = 0.529), diastolic blood pressure immediately upon returning to the ward (83.83 ± 11.978 vs. 84.75 ± 12.422, P = 0.506), diastolic blood pressure 48 h post-surgery (74.69 ± 9.773 vs. 75.76 ± 10.605, P = 0.353), heart rate immediately upon returning to the ward (74.31 ± 11.610 vs. 75.15 ± 11.660, P = 0.522), or heart rate 48 h post-surgery (80.49 ± 12.267 vs. 79.11 ± 10.969, P = 0.293). Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding anastomotic fistula, intestinal obstruction, postoperative pneumonia, reoperation, mortality, combined organ resection, or postoperative hospital stay (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increasing blood pressure before the end of gastrectomy can effectively reduce the incidence of primary postoperative hemorrhage without affecting the stability of the perioperative circulatory system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892180/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02826-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02826-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨胃手术结束时提高血压减少胃切除术后出血的疗效,并评价这种临床干预是否影响患者术后循环系统的稳定性。方法:回顾性分析2023年1月至2024年1月在我中心行全麻根治性胃切除术的499例患者。经1:1倾向评分匹配,实验组157例患者在胃切除术结束前血压升高后检查手术腔,对照组157例患者在未升高血压的情况下进行常规手术腔检查。结果:实验组术后总出血发生率(0%比3.82%,P = 0.013)和术后早期出血发生率(0%比2.55%,P = 0.044)均显著低于对照组。两组患者延迟出血(0%比1.23%,P = 0.156)、术后即刻收缩压(121.02±18.196比120.34±21.664,P = 0.795)、术后48 h收缩压(125.04±16.242比126.23±17.048,P = 0.529)、术后即刻舒张压(83.83±11.978比84.75±12.422,P = 0.506)、术后即刻舒张压(83.83±11.978比84.75±12.422,P = 0.506)、术后48 h舒张压(74.69±9.773比75.76±10.605,P = 0.353)、返回病房时心率(74.31±11.610比75.15±11.660,P = 0.522)、术后48 h心率(80.49±12.267比79.11±10.969,P = 0.293)。两组吻合口瘘、肠梗阻、术后肺炎、再手术、死亡率、联合脏器切除、术后住院时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:胃切除术结束前提高血压可有效降低术后原发性出血的发生率,且不影响围手术期循环系统的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the efficacy of a prophylactic increasing blood pressure before the end of surgery to reduce postoperative bleeding after gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of reducing post-gastrectomy hemorrhage by increasing blood pressure at the end of gastric surgery and to evaluate whether this clinical intervention affects the stability of patients' postoperative circulatory system.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 499 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy under general anesthesia at our center between January 2023 and January 2024. After 1:1 propensity score matching, the experimental group comprised 157 patients whose operation cavities were examined after increasing blood pressure before the end of gastrectomy, while the control group included 157 patients whose operation cavities were examined using routine procedures without increasing blood pressure.

Results: The incidences of total postoperative bleeding (0% vs. 3.82%, P = 0.013) and early postoperative bleeding (0% vs. 2.55%, P = 0.044) were significantly lower in the experimental group compared to the control group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in delayed bleeding (0% vs. 1.23%, P = 0.156), systolic blood pressure immediately upon returning to the ward (121.02 ± 18.196 vs. 120.34 ± 21.664, P = 0.795), systolic blood pressure 48 h post-surgery (125.04 ± 16.242 vs. 126.23 ± 17.048, P = 0.529), diastolic blood pressure immediately upon returning to the ward (83.83 ± 11.978 vs. 84.75 ± 12.422, P = 0.506), diastolic blood pressure 48 h post-surgery (74.69 ± 9.773 vs. 75.76 ± 10.605, P = 0.353), heart rate immediately upon returning to the ward (74.31 ± 11.610 vs. 75.15 ± 11.660, P = 0.522), or heart rate 48 h post-surgery (80.49 ± 12.267 vs. 79.11 ± 10.969, P = 0.293). Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding anastomotic fistula, intestinal obstruction, postoperative pneumonia, reoperation, mortality, combined organ resection, or postoperative hospital stay (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Increasing blood pressure before the end of gastrectomy can effectively reduce the incidence of primary postoperative hemorrhage without affecting the stability of the perioperative circulatory system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信