{"title":"大数据分析对沙特卫生部医院急诊科效率的影响:回顾性数据分析","authors":"Mohammed Senitan, Bandar Jarallah Alzahrani","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S503744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of big data analytics in healthcare has become essential for enhancing operational performance, particularly within Emergency Departments (EDs), where efficiency improvements can significantly impact patient satisfaction and resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study examines the impact of big data analytics on ED performance metrics within Saudi Arabia's Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals, with a focus on key performance indicators (KPIs) and the effectiveness of the Ada'a Health Program in optimizing ED operations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted across 10 hospitals in five regions of Saudi Arabia. Data from 228,857 patient records were analyzed, alongside survey responses from 223 ED personnel. Statistical analyses, including paired t-tests, Pearson's correlation, and multiple regression models, were used to evaluate improvements in KPIs and assess the program's impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant improvements in all KPIs were observed following the implementation of the Adaa Health Program. Door-to-Doctor Time decreased from 28:26 to 25:13, Doctor-to-Decision Time from 1:18:22 to 1:03:50, Decision-to-Disposition Time from 36:37 to 20:13, and Door-to-Disposition Time from 2:22:02 to 1:48:44. Pearson's correlation analysis indicated a strong relationship between Decision-to-Disposition Time and Doctor-to-Decision Time (r = 0.594), emphasizing the role of clinical decision-making in patient flow. Regression analysis further confirmed the program's significant association with reduced wait times (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the transformative impact of big data-driven decision-making in optimizing ED efficiency. The Ada'a Health Program has significantly improved patient flow, reduced congestion, and enhanced operational performance in Saudi MOH hospitals. These findings underscore the need for continued investment in big data analytics, updated predictive modeling, and workflow automation to sustain and further enhance ED efficiency. Future research should explore scalability across diverse healthcare settings and the long-term sustainability of such interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"775-784"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Big Data Analytics on Emergency Department Efficiency in Saudi Ministry of Health Hospitals: A Retrospective Data Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Senitan, Bandar Jarallah Alzahrani\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S503744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of big data analytics in healthcare has become essential for enhancing operational performance, particularly within Emergency Departments (EDs), where efficiency improvements can significantly impact patient satisfaction and resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study examines the impact of big data analytics on ED performance metrics within Saudi Arabia's Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals, with a focus on key performance indicators (KPIs) and the effectiveness of the Ada'a Health Program in optimizing ED operations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted across 10 hospitals in five regions of Saudi Arabia. Data from 228,857 patient records were analyzed, alongside survey responses from 223 ED personnel. Statistical analyses, including paired t-tests, Pearson's correlation, and multiple regression models, were used to evaluate improvements in KPIs and assess the program's impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant improvements in all KPIs were observed following the implementation of the Adaa Health Program. Door-to-Doctor Time decreased from 28:26 to 25:13, Doctor-to-Decision Time from 1:18:22 to 1:03:50, Decision-to-Disposition Time from 36:37 to 20:13, and Door-to-Disposition Time from 2:22:02 to 1:48:44. Pearson's correlation analysis indicated a strong relationship between Decision-to-Disposition Time and Doctor-to-Decision Time (r = 0.594), emphasizing the role of clinical decision-making in patient flow. Regression analysis further confirmed the program's significant association with reduced wait times (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the transformative impact of big data-driven decision-making in optimizing ED efficiency. The Ada'a Health Program has significantly improved patient flow, reduced congestion, and enhanced operational performance in Saudi MOH hospitals. These findings underscore the need for continued investment in big data analytics, updated predictive modeling, and workflow automation to sustain and further enhance ED efficiency. Future research should explore scalability across diverse healthcare settings and the long-term sustainability of such interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"775-784\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892489/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S503744\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S503744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在医疗保健领域整合大数据分析对于提高运营绩效至关重要,特别是在急诊科(ed),效率的提高可以显著影响患者满意度和资源利用率。目的:本研究探讨了大数据分析对沙特阿拉伯卫生部(MOH)医院ED绩效指标的影响,重点关注关键绩效指标(kpi)和Ada'a Health Program在优化ED运营方面的有效性。方法:回顾性观察研究在沙特阿拉伯五个地区的10家医院进行。分析了228,857例患者记录的数据,以及223名急诊科人员的调查回复。统计分析,包括配对t检验、Pearson相关和多元回归模型,用于评估kpi的改进和评估项目的影响。结果:在实施Adaa健康计划后,观察到所有kpi都有显着改善。从门到医生的时间从28:26减少到25:13,从医生到决策的时间从1:18:22减少到1:03:50,从决策到处置的时间从36:37减少到20:13,从门到处置的时间从2:22:02减少到1:48:44。Pearson相关分析显示,决策到处置时间与医生到决策时间之间存在较强的相关性(r = 0.594),强调了临床决策在患者流程中的作用。回归分析进一步证实了该计划与减少等待时间的显著关联(p < 0.001)。结论:本研究强调了大数据驱动决策在优化ED效率方面的变革性影响。Ada'a卫生方案显著改善了沙特卫生部医院的病人流量,减少了拥堵,并提高了运营绩效。这些发现强调了在大数据分析、更新预测建模和工作流程自动化方面持续投资的必要性,以维持并进一步提高ED的效率。未来的研究应该探索不同医疗环境的可扩展性和这种干预措施的长期可持续性。
Impact of Big Data Analytics on Emergency Department Efficiency in Saudi Ministry of Health Hospitals: A Retrospective Data Analysis.
Background: The integration of big data analytics in healthcare has become essential for enhancing operational performance, particularly within Emergency Departments (EDs), where efficiency improvements can significantly impact patient satisfaction and resource utilization.
Aim: This study examines the impact of big data analytics on ED performance metrics within Saudi Arabia's Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals, with a focus on key performance indicators (KPIs) and the effectiveness of the Ada'a Health Program in optimizing ED operations.
Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted across 10 hospitals in five regions of Saudi Arabia. Data from 228,857 patient records were analyzed, alongside survey responses from 223 ED personnel. Statistical analyses, including paired t-tests, Pearson's correlation, and multiple regression models, were used to evaluate improvements in KPIs and assess the program's impact.
Results: Significant improvements in all KPIs were observed following the implementation of the Adaa Health Program. Door-to-Doctor Time decreased from 28:26 to 25:13, Doctor-to-Decision Time from 1:18:22 to 1:03:50, Decision-to-Disposition Time from 36:37 to 20:13, and Door-to-Disposition Time from 2:22:02 to 1:48:44. Pearson's correlation analysis indicated a strong relationship between Decision-to-Disposition Time and Doctor-to-Decision Time (r = 0.594), emphasizing the role of clinical decision-making in patient flow. Regression analysis further confirmed the program's significant association with reduced wait times (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: This study highlights the transformative impact of big data-driven decision-making in optimizing ED efficiency. The Ada'a Health Program has significantly improved patient flow, reduced congestion, and enhanced operational performance in Saudi MOH hospitals. These findings underscore the need for continued investment in big data analytics, updated predictive modeling, and workflow automation to sustain and further enhance ED efficiency. Future research should explore scalability across diverse healthcare settings and the long-term sustainability of such interventions.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.