机器人辅助微创食管切除术的标准化方案:提高效率和降低成本。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Hidehiko Kitagami, Saseem Poudel, Yosuke Kitayama, Junkichi Koinuma, Yuma Ebihara, Satoshi Hirano
{"title":"机器人辅助微创食管切除术的标准化方案:提高效率和降低成本。","authors":"Hidehiko Kitagami, Saseem Poudel, Yosuke Kitayama, Junkichi Koinuma, Yuma Ebihara, Satoshi Hirano","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02269-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) has shown potential benefits over conventional procedures for esophageal cancer. However, uniform surgical protocols are lacking, leading to variability in outcomes and increased costs. This retrospective study included 180 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent RAMIE between May 2018 and September 2024. A standardized approach, termed counterclockwise partitioned mediastinal dissection (CPMD), was introduced in 114 of these cases. Perioperative parameters including operative time, blood loss, complications, and cost of disposable instruments, were compared between patients treated before and after protocol standardization. Among the 114 patients who received the standardized RAMIE protocol, the median thoracic console time significantly decreased to 148 min, with overall blood loss reduced to 62 ml. No conversions to open surgery were required in either cohort. Compared to the pre-standardization group, postoperative complications-including recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis-were lower and only one patient needed reoperation. Importantly, reusing robotic instruments from the thoracic phase in the abdominal phase reduced disposable instrument costs, resulting in a savings of approximately 168,000 Japanese Yen (USD 1050) per case. Implementing a standardized RAMIE protocol enhances procedural efficiency, reduces blood loss, and lowers costs without compromising surgical or oncological outcomes. This approach may facilitate broader adoption of RAMIE as a safe and cost-effective strategy for esophageal cancer surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A standardized protocol for robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: improving efficiency and reducing costs.\",\"authors\":\"Hidehiko Kitagami, Saseem Poudel, Yosuke Kitayama, Junkichi Koinuma, Yuma Ebihara, Satoshi Hirano\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11701-025-02269-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) has shown potential benefits over conventional procedures for esophageal cancer. However, uniform surgical protocols are lacking, leading to variability in outcomes and increased costs. This retrospective study included 180 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent RAMIE between May 2018 and September 2024. A standardized approach, termed counterclockwise partitioned mediastinal dissection (CPMD), was introduced in 114 of these cases. Perioperative parameters including operative time, blood loss, complications, and cost of disposable instruments, were compared between patients treated before and after protocol standardization. Among the 114 patients who received the standardized RAMIE protocol, the median thoracic console time significantly decreased to 148 min, with overall blood loss reduced to 62 ml. No conversions to open surgery were required in either cohort. Compared to the pre-standardization group, postoperative complications-including recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis-were lower and only one patient needed reoperation. Importantly, reusing robotic instruments from the thoracic phase in the abdominal phase reduced disposable instrument costs, resulting in a savings of approximately 168,000 Japanese Yen (USD 1050) per case. Implementing a standardized RAMIE protocol enhances procedural efficiency, reduces blood loss, and lowers costs without compromising surgical or oncological outcomes. This approach may facilitate broader adoption of RAMIE as a safe and cost-effective strategy for esophageal cancer surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02269-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02269-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)已经显示出比传统手术治疗食管癌的潜在益处。然而,缺乏统一的手术方案,导致结果的变化和成本的增加。这项回顾性研究包括180名食管癌患者,他们在2018年5月至2024年9月期间接受了RAMIE手术。其中114例采用了标准化的方法,称为逆时针分割纵隔分离(CPMD)。比较方案标准化前后患者的围手术期参数,包括手术时间、出血量、并发症和一次性器械费用。在接受标准化RAMIE方案的114例患者中,中位胸椎稳住时间显著缩短至148分钟,总失血量减少至62毫升。两组患者均无需转行开放手术。与标准化前组相比,术后并发症(包括喉返神经麻痹)较低,只有1例患者需要再次手术。重要的是,在腹部阶段重复使用胸腔阶段的机器人器械减少了一次性器械的成本,每个病例节省了大约168,000日元(1050美元)。实施标准化的RAMIE方案可提高手术效率,减少失血,降低成本,同时不影响手术或肿瘤结果。这种方法可以促进RAMIE作为食管癌手术的一种安全、经济的策略被广泛采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A standardized protocol for robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: improving efficiency and reducing costs.

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) has shown potential benefits over conventional procedures for esophageal cancer. However, uniform surgical protocols are lacking, leading to variability in outcomes and increased costs. This retrospective study included 180 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent RAMIE between May 2018 and September 2024. A standardized approach, termed counterclockwise partitioned mediastinal dissection (CPMD), was introduced in 114 of these cases. Perioperative parameters including operative time, blood loss, complications, and cost of disposable instruments, were compared between patients treated before and after protocol standardization. Among the 114 patients who received the standardized RAMIE protocol, the median thoracic console time significantly decreased to 148 min, with overall blood loss reduced to 62 ml. No conversions to open surgery were required in either cohort. Compared to the pre-standardization group, postoperative complications-including recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis-were lower and only one patient needed reoperation. Importantly, reusing robotic instruments from the thoracic phase in the abdominal phase reduced disposable instrument costs, resulting in a savings of approximately 168,000 Japanese Yen (USD 1050) per case. Implementing a standardized RAMIE protocol enhances procedural efficiency, reduces blood loss, and lowers costs without compromising surgical or oncological outcomes. This approach may facilitate broader adoption of RAMIE as a safe and cost-effective strategy for esophageal cancer surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信