Shuoshuo Li, Ping Ye, Weina Du, Ling Cheng, Ru Bai, Qing Liu, Fulin Cai, Wenjuan Wang, Jing Zhang
{"title":"中国大学生抑郁变化期望量表的信度和效度:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Shuoshuo Li, Ping Ye, Weina Du, Ling Cheng, Ru Bai, Qing Liu, Fulin Cai, Wenjuan Wang, Jing Zhang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-92573-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the rising prevalence of mental health issues, depression not only causes significant psychological distress and severely impairs social functioning and quality of life but also heightens the risk of suicide. The Depression Change Expectation Scale (DCES) is an assessment tool designed to evaluate the attitudes of individuals exhibiting depressive tendencies or symptoms regarding their anticipated future changes in depression. Understanding adolescents' expectations about changes in depression can enable timely and targeted interventions before their mental health deteriorates. However, a Chinese version of the DCES is yet to be developed. This study aimed to translate the DCES, cross-cultural adaptation, and validate the Chinese version of the DCES among college students. Following the Brislin translation model, the initial draft of the DCES was translated and back-translated. The Chinese version was refined through expert localization and a preliminary survey. Using a convenience sampling method, 1,138 students from various universities in Anhui province were surveyed from September to December 2023. Among these, 481 students exhibiting depressive symptoms and tendencies, as identified by the Beck Depression Inventory, were selected for the reliability and validity analysis of the Chinese version of the DCES. The Chinese version of the DCES demonstrated a robust two-factor model fit (Chi-square/degrees of freedom = 2.604; comparative fit index = 0.973; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.970; goodness of fit index = 0.912; normed fit index = 0.958; root mean square error of approximation = 0.058). The scale-level content validity index was 0.898, and item-level content validity indices ranged from 0.830 to 1.000. The internal consistency, as measured by Cronbach's alpha, was 0.910 for the entire scale and ranged from 0.888 to 0.980 for individual dimensions. The test-retest reliability was 0.985 for the total scale, with individual dimensions' test-retest reliability ranging from 0.982 to 0.985. This study, supported by previous evidence, indicates that the Chinese version of the DCES possesses excellent validity and reliability. It is a valuable tool for measuring expectations regarding changes in depression and has the potential to predict future trends in depressive symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"8198"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894065/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The reliability and validity of the depression change expectancy scale in college students: a cross-sectional study in China.\",\"authors\":\"Shuoshuo Li, Ping Ye, Weina Du, Ling Cheng, Ru Bai, Qing Liu, Fulin Cai, Wenjuan Wang, Jing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-92573-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With the rising prevalence of mental health issues, depression not only causes significant psychological distress and severely impairs social functioning and quality of life but also heightens the risk of suicide. The Depression Change Expectation Scale (DCES) is an assessment tool designed to evaluate the attitudes of individuals exhibiting depressive tendencies or symptoms regarding their anticipated future changes in depression. Understanding adolescents' expectations about changes in depression can enable timely and targeted interventions before their mental health deteriorates. However, a Chinese version of the DCES is yet to be developed. This study aimed to translate the DCES, cross-cultural adaptation, and validate the Chinese version of the DCES among college students. Following the Brislin translation model, the initial draft of the DCES was translated and back-translated. The Chinese version was refined through expert localization and a preliminary survey. Using a convenience sampling method, 1,138 students from various universities in Anhui province were surveyed from September to December 2023. Among these, 481 students exhibiting depressive symptoms and tendencies, as identified by the Beck Depression Inventory, were selected for the reliability and validity analysis of the Chinese version of the DCES. The Chinese version of the DCES demonstrated a robust two-factor model fit (Chi-square/degrees of freedom = 2.604; comparative fit index = 0.973; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.970; goodness of fit index = 0.912; normed fit index = 0.958; root mean square error of approximation = 0.058). The scale-level content validity index was 0.898, and item-level content validity indices ranged from 0.830 to 1.000. The internal consistency, as measured by Cronbach's alpha, was 0.910 for the entire scale and ranged from 0.888 to 0.980 for individual dimensions. The test-retest reliability was 0.985 for the total scale, with individual dimensions' test-retest reliability ranging from 0.982 to 0.985. This study, supported by previous evidence, indicates that the Chinese version of the DCES possesses excellent validity and reliability. It is a valuable tool for measuring expectations regarding changes in depression and has the potential to predict future trends in depressive symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"8198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894065/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92573-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92573-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The reliability and validity of the depression change expectancy scale in college students: a cross-sectional study in China.
With the rising prevalence of mental health issues, depression not only causes significant psychological distress and severely impairs social functioning and quality of life but also heightens the risk of suicide. The Depression Change Expectation Scale (DCES) is an assessment tool designed to evaluate the attitudes of individuals exhibiting depressive tendencies or symptoms regarding their anticipated future changes in depression. Understanding adolescents' expectations about changes in depression can enable timely and targeted interventions before their mental health deteriorates. However, a Chinese version of the DCES is yet to be developed. This study aimed to translate the DCES, cross-cultural adaptation, and validate the Chinese version of the DCES among college students. Following the Brislin translation model, the initial draft of the DCES was translated and back-translated. The Chinese version was refined through expert localization and a preliminary survey. Using a convenience sampling method, 1,138 students from various universities in Anhui province were surveyed from September to December 2023. Among these, 481 students exhibiting depressive symptoms and tendencies, as identified by the Beck Depression Inventory, were selected for the reliability and validity analysis of the Chinese version of the DCES. The Chinese version of the DCES demonstrated a robust two-factor model fit (Chi-square/degrees of freedom = 2.604; comparative fit index = 0.973; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.970; goodness of fit index = 0.912; normed fit index = 0.958; root mean square error of approximation = 0.058). The scale-level content validity index was 0.898, and item-level content validity indices ranged from 0.830 to 1.000. The internal consistency, as measured by Cronbach's alpha, was 0.910 for the entire scale and ranged from 0.888 to 0.980 for individual dimensions. The test-retest reliability was 0.985 for the total scale, with individual dimensions' test-retest reliability ranging from 0.982 to 0.985. This study, supported by previous evidence, indicates that the Chinese version of the DCES possesses excellent validity and reliability. It is a valuable tool for measuring expectations regarding changes in depression and has the potential to predict future trends in depressive symptoms.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.