种族共享现实量表:捕捉美国黑人与美国白人在种族和种族主义问题上的共识。

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Caitlyn Yantis, Dorainne J Green, Christopher K Marshburn, India R Johnson, Valerie Jones Taylor
{"title":"种族共享现实量表:捕捉美国黑人与美国白人在种族和种族主义问题上的共识。","authors":"Caitlyn Yantis, Dorainne J Green, Christopher K Marshburn, India R Johnson, Valerie Jones Taylor","doi":"10.1037/xge0001736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Black individuals often feel unheard and misunderstood by White people during conversations about race. These experiences could be due in part to a perceived disconnect between their own and White people's views on race. In the current research (<i>N</i> = 1,470 Black Americans), we developed and tested a new scale to capture this potential mechanism-<i>racial shared reality</i> (RSR)-which we conceptualize as Black Americans' perceived consensus with White Americans about race and racism. First, we demonstrated the RSR scale's validity and reliability (Studies 1 and 2a), including its consistency across time (Study 2b). We also showed the scale's predictive validity. Specifically, RSR uniquely predicted Black Americans' general interaction experiences with White people (e.g., identity-safety; Study 2b) as well as their expectations for feeling understood when disclosing a personal experience of racial bias (Study 3). These patterns held even when controlling for established predictors of interaction quality, including perceptions of White individuals' prejudice, similarity, and general shared reality. Finally, in the context of an anticipated live interaction with a White person about racial profiling, we found that a cue intended to promote identity-safety-a White person's racially diverse (vs. all White) friendship network-was effective in part because it boosted Black individuals' felt RSR with their White partner (Study 4). Together, this work demonstrates that RSR is critical for understanding Black individuals' experiences discussing race with White people and provides a new tool for assessing RSR in future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The racial shared reality scale: Capturing Black Americans' perceived consensus with White Americans about race and racism.\",\"authors\":\"Caitlyn Yantis, Dorainne J Green, Christopher K Marshburn, India R Johnson, Valerie Jones Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xge0001736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Black individuals often feel unheard and misunderstood by White people during conversations about race. These experiences could be due in part to a perceived disconnect between their own and White people's views on race. In the current research (<i>N</i> = 1,470 Black Americans), we developed and tested a new scale to capture this potential mechanism-<i>racial shared reality</i> (RSR)-which we conceptualize as Black Americans' perceived consensus with White Americans about race and racism. First, we demonstrated the RSR scale's validity and reliability (Studies 1 and 2a), including its consistency across time (Study 2b). We also showed the scale's predictive validity. Specifically, RSR uniquely predicted Black Americans' general interaction experiences with White people (e.g., identity-safety; Study 2b) as well as their expectations for feeling understood when disclosing a personal experience of racial bias (Study 3). These patterns held even when controlling for established predictors of interaction quality, including perceptions of White individuals' prejudice, similarity, and general shared reality. Finally, in the context of an anticipated live interaction with a White person about racial profiling, we found that a cue intended to promote identity-safety-a White person's racially diverse (vs. all White) friendship network-was effective in part because it boosted Black individuals' felt RSR with their White partner (Study 4). Together, this work demonstrates that RSR is critical for understanding Black individuals' experiences discussing race with White people and provides a new tool for assessing RSR in future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001736\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001736","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在关于种族的谈话中,黑人经常感到被白人忽视和误解。这些经历可能部分是由于他们自己和白人在种族问题上的看法不一致。在当前的研究中(N = 1,470名美国黑人),我们开发并测试了一个新的量表来捕捉这种潜在的机制——种族共享现实(RSR)——我们将其概念化为美国黑人与美国白人在种族和种族主义方面的共识。首先,我们证明了RSR量表的效度和信度(研究1和2a),包括其跨时间的一致性(研究2b)。我们还显示了量表的预测效度。具体来说,RSR独特地预测了美国黑人与白人的一般互动体验(例如,身份-安全;研究2b),以及他们在披露个人种族偏见经历时感觉被理解的期望(研究3)。这些模式即使在控制了既定的互动质量预测因素(包括对白人偏见、相似性和一般共同现实的看法)的情况下仍然成立。最后,在预期与白人就种族貌相进行现场互动的背景下,我们发现一个旨在促进身份安全的线索——白人的种族多样性(与所有白人)友谊网络——是有效的,部分原因是它提高了黑人与白人伴侣的RSR(研究4)。这项研究表明,RSR对于理解黑人与白人讨论种族的经历至关重要,并为未来研究中评估RSR提供了新的工具。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The racial shared reality scale: Capturing Black Americans' perceived consensus with White Americans about race and racism.

Black individuals often feel unheard and misunderstood by White people during conversations about race. These experiences could be due in part to a perceived disconnect between their own and White people's views on race. In the current research (N = 1,470 Black Americans), we developed and tested a new scale to capture this potential mechanism-racial shared reality (RSR)-which we conceptualize as Black Americans' perceived consensus with White Americans about race and racism. First, we demonstrated the RSR scale's validity and reliability (Studies 1 and 2a), including its consistency across time (Study 2b). We also showed the scale's predictive validity. Specifically, RSR uniquely predicted Black Americans' general interaction experiences with White people (e.g., identity-safety; Study 2b) as well as their expectations for feeling understood when disclosing a personal experience of racial bias (Study 3). These patterns held even when controlling for established predictors of interaction quality, including perceptions of White individuals' prejudice, similarity, and general shared reality. Finally, in the context of an anticipated live interaction with a White person about racial profiling, we found that a cue intended to promote identity-safety-a White person's racially diverse (vs. all White) friendship network-was effective in part because it boosted Black individuals' felt RSR with their White partner (Study 4). Together, this work demonstrates that RSR is critical for understanding Black individuals' experiences discussing race with White people and provides a new tool for assessing RSR in future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: General publishes articles describing empirical work that bridges the traditional interests of two or more communities of psychology. The work may touch on issues dealt with in JEP: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, JEP: Human Perception and Performance, JEP: Animal Behavior Processes, or JEP: Applied, but may also concern issues in other subdisciplines of psychology, including social processes, developmental processes, psychopathology, neuroscience, or computational modeling. Articles in JEP: General may be longer than the usual journal publication if necessary, but shorter articles that bridge subdisciplines will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信