经皮经椎间孔内窥镜减压与后路短节段融合术治疗退行性腰椎侧凸伴腰椎管狭窄:一项至少5年随访的队列研究

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
International Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1007/s00264-025-06479-3
He Song, Aobo Wang, Tianyi Wang, Ning Fan, Peng Du, Qichao Wu, Lei Zang, Shuo Yuan
{"title":"经皮经椎间孔内窥镜减压与后路短节段融合术治疗退行性腰椎侧凸伴腰椎管狭窄:一项至少5年随访的队列研究","authors":"He Song, Aobo Wang, Tianyi Wang, Ning Fan, Peng Du, Qichao Wu, Lei Zang, Shuo Yuan","doi":"10.1007/s00264-025-06479-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression (PTED) with those of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 143 DLS patients who met the inclusion criteria from January 2016 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into the PTED and PLIF groups. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to adjust for imbalanced confounding variables between the groups. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were then used to compare the clinical outcomes between the two groups. Furthermore, changes in radiological characteristics and surgical complications were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 86 patients were included in the study with a followup duration of at least five years. Postoperative VAS and ODI scores were significantly improved in both groups at all time points compared with preoperative values (p < 0.001). However, the PTED group had higher VAS scores for back pain and ODI scores than the PLIF group at five years postoperatively (p < 0.05). For radiological parameters, the Cobb angle decreased in the PLIF group but increased in the PTED group at the final followup (p < 0.05). A decrease in the adjacent disc height was observed in the PLIF group at the final followup (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both PTED and PLIF achieved relatively satisfactory outcomes in treating DLS with LSS after a minimum five year followup. However, further studies are required to better determine the characteristics of spinal deformities amenable to each procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"1211-1222"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression versus posterior short-segment fusion for treating degenerative lumbar scoliosis with lumbar spinal stenosis: a cohort study with a minimum five year followup.\",\"authors\":\"He Song, Aobo Wang, Tianyi Wang, Ning Fan, Peng Du, Qichao Wu, Lei Zang, Shuo Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00264-025-06479-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression (PTED) with those of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 143 DLS patients who met the inclusion criteria from January 2016 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into the PTED and PLIF groups. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to adjust for imbalanced confounding variables between the groups. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were then used to compare the clinical outcomes between the two groups. Furthermore, changes in radiological characteristics and surgical complications were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 86 patients were included in the study with a followup duration of at least five years. Postoperative VAS and ODI scores were significantly improved in both groups at all time points compared with preoperative values (p < 0.001). However, the PTED group had higher VAS scores for back pain and ODI scores than the PLIF group at five years postoperatively (p < 0.05). For radiological parameters, the Cobb angle decreased in the PLIF group but increased in the PTED group at the final followup (p < 0.05). A decrease in the adjacent disc height was observed in the PLIF group at the final followup (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both PTED and PLIF achieved relatively satisfactory outcomes in treating DLS with LSS after a minimum five year followup. However, further studies are required to better determine the characteristics of spinal deformities amenable to each procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1211-1222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06479-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06479-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本回顾性队列研究旨在比较经皮经椎间孔内窥镜减压(PTED)与后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)治疗伴有腰椎管狭窄(LSS)的退行性腰椎侧凸(DLS)的临床结果。方法:本研究回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年3月符合纳入标准的143例DLS患者,分为PTED组和PLIF组。采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)方法对组间不平衡的混杂变量进行校正。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评分比较两组患者的临床结果。此外,评估放射学特征和手术并发症的变化。结果:经PSM治疗后,86例患者纳入研究,随访时间至少为5年。与术前相比,两组术后VAS和ODI评分在各时间点均有显著改善(p)。结论:经至少5年随访,PTED和PLIF治疗LSS均取得了相对满意的结果。然而,需要进一步的研究来更好地确定适合每种手术的脊柱畸形的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression versus posterior short-segment fusion for treating degenerative lumbar scoliosis with lumbar spinal stenosis: a cohort study with a minimum five year followup.

Purpose: This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression (PTED) with those of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

Methods: In this study, 143 DLS patients who met the inclusion criteria from January 2016 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into the PTED and PLIF groups. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to adjust for imbalanced confounding variables between the groups. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were then used to compare the clinical outcomes between the two groups. Furthermore, changes in radiological characteristics and surgical complications were assessed.

Results: After PSM, 86 patients were included in the study with a followup duration of at least five years. Postoperative VAS and ODI scores were significantly improved in both groups at all time points compared with preoperative values (p < 0.001). However, the PTED group had higher VAS scores for back pain and ODI scores than the PLIF group at five years postoperatively (p < 0.05). For radiological parameters, the Cobb angle decreased in the PLIF group but increased in the PTED group at the final followup (p < 0.05). A decrease in the adjacent disc height was observed in the PLIF group at the final followup (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Both PTED and PLIF achieved relatively satisfactory outcomes in treating DLS with LSS after a minimum five year followup. However, further studies are required to better determine the characteristics of spinal deformities amenable to each procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Orthopaedics
International Orthopaedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
360
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters. Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信