经肝胃底穿刺与胃体穿刺在ct引导下经皮胃造口术中灌注的比较分析。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Qi Xiao-Mei, Hu Chang-Ming, Liu Li, Liang Qing-Hua, Xiong Jun-Ru, Li Liang-Shan, Deng Liang-Yu, Tang Guang-Ying, Huang Xue-Quan, He Chuang
{"title":"经肝胃底穿刺与胃体穿刺在ct引导下经皮胃造口术中灌注的比较分析。","authors":"Qi Xiao-Mei, Hu Chang-Ming, Liu Li, Liang Qing-Hua, Xiong Jun-Ru, Li Liang-Shan, Deng Liang-Yu, Tang Guang-Ying, Huang Xue-Quan, He Chuang","doi":"10.1186/s40001-025-02426-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transhepatic cardia-gastric fundus puncture (TCFP) for insufflation for CT-guided percutaneous gastrostomy (CPG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 38 patients who underwent TCFP for insufflation and 161 patients who underwent percutaneous gastric body for insufflation at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The operative time, success rate, complication rate, overall procedure time, and incidence of complications within 3 months were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate of insufflation was 100%, and no serious complications occurred during percutaneous gastric insufflation. The average time for insufflation via TCFP was 9.60 ± 6.62 min, and that via gastric body puncture was 8.71 ± 71.8 min, with no significant difference between the two (p = 0.485). The overall duration of gastrostomy in the TCFP group was 32.16 ± 10.27 min and 33.94 ± 13.82 min in the gastric body group, with no significant difference (p = 0.456). The incidence of submucosal air spread was 0% in the TCFP group and 9.9% in the gastric body group, with significant difference (p = 0.045). The complication rates following insufflation via TCFP and via gastric body puncture were 18.4% and 21.7%, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.652). The perioperative pain score was 2 after insufflation via TCFP and via gastric body puncture, with no significant difference (p = 0.119). The overall mortality rate was 0 in the first postoperative month, with a 3-month mortality rate of 5% (10/199). The surviving patients showed a significant increase in weight from 51.81 ± 8.52 kg to 52.52 ± 9.39 kg at 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TCFP for insufflation is safe and effective, with a 100% success rate and no increased risk of complications. The choice of procedure should be based on the patient's specific condition and the physician's experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of transhepatic cardia-gastric fundus puncture vs. gastric body puncture for insufflation for CT-guided percutaneous gastrostomy.\",\"authors\":\"Qi Xiao-Mei, Hu Chang-Ming, Liu Li, Liang Qing-Hua, Xiong Jun-Ru, Li Liang-Shan, Deng Liang-Yu, Tang Guang-Ying, Huang Xue-Quan, He Chuang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40001-025-02426-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transhepatic cardia-gastric fundus puncture (TCFP) for insufflation for CT-guided percutaneous gastrostomy (CPG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 38 patients who underwent TCFP for insufflation and 161 patients who underwent percutaneous gastric body for insufflation at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The operative time, success rate, complication rate, overall procedure time, and incidence of complications within 3 months were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate of insufflation was 100%, and no serious complications occurred during percutaneous gastric insufflation. The average time for insufflation via TCFP was 9.60 ± 6.62 min, and that via gastric body puncture was 8.71 ± 71.8 min, with no significant difference between the two (p = 0.485). The overall duration of gastrostomy in the TCFP group was 32.16 ± 10.27 min and 33.94 ± 13.82 min in the gastric body group, with no significant difference (p = 0.456). The incidence of submucosal air spread was 0% in the TCFP group and 9.9% in the gastric body group, with significant difference (p = 0.045). The complication rates following insufflation via TCFP and via gastric body puncture were 18.4% and 21.7%, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.652). The perioperative pain score was 2 after insufflation via TCFP and via gastric body puncture, with no significant difference (p = 0.119). The overall mortality rate was 0 in the first postoperative month, with a 3-month mortality rate of 5% (10/199). The surviving patients showed a significant increase in weight from 51.81 ± 8.52 kg to 52.52 ± 9.39 kg at 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TCFP for insufflation is safe and effective, with a 100% success rate and no increased risk of complications. The choice of procedure should be based on the patient's specific condition and the physician's experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892129/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02426-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02426-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价经肝胃底穿刺(TCFP)在ct引导下经皮胃造口术(CPG)中的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析38例TCFP灌胃术和161例经皮胃体单中心灌胃术的临床资料。收集手术时间、成功率、并发症发生率、总手术时间、3个月内并发症发生率。结果:经皮胃注气成功率100%,无严重并发症发生。经TCFP灌气平均时间为9.60±6.62 min,经胃体穿刺灌气平均时间为8.71±71.8 min,两者差异无统计学意义(p = 0.485)。TCFP组胃造口总时间为32.16±10.27 min,胃体组为33.94±13.82 min,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.456)。TCFP组粘膜下空气扩散发生率为0%,胃体组为9.9%,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.045)。经TCFP灌胃和经胃体穿刺灌胃的并发症发生率分别为18.4%和21.7%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(p = 0.652)。经TCFP灌胃与经胃体穿刺灌胃围术期疼痛评分为2分,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.119)。术后第一个月总死亡率为0,3个月死亡率为5%(10/199)。存活患者术后3个月体重由51.81±8.52 kg增加至52.52±9.39 kg (p = 0.009)。结论:TCFP充气安全有效,成功率100%,无并发症增加。手术的选择应根据病人的具体情况和医生的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative analysis of transhepatic cardia-gastric fundus puncture vs. gastric body puncture for insufflation for CT-guided percutaneous gastrostomy.

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transhepatic cardia-gastric fundus puncture (TCFP) for insufflation for CT-guided percutaneous gastrostomy (CPG).

Methods: The clinical data of 38 patients who underwent TCFP for insufflation and 161 patients who underwent percutaneous gastric body for insufflation at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The operative time, success rate, complication rate, overall procedure time, and incidence of complications within 3 months were collected.

Results: The success rate of insufflation was 100%, and no serious complications occurred during percutaneous gastric insufflation. The average time for insufflation via TCFP was 9.60 ± 6.62 min, and that via gastric body puncture was 8.71 ± 71.8 min, with no significant difference between the two (p = 0.485). The overall duration of gastrostomy in the TCFP group was 32.16 ± 10.27 min and 33.94 ± 13.82 min in the gastric body group, with no significant difference (p = 0.456). The incidence of submucosal air spread was 0% in the TCFP group and 9.9% in the gastric body group, with significant difference (p = 0.045). The complication rates following insufflation via TCFP and via gastric body puncture were 18.4% and 21.7%, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.652). The perioperative pain score was 2 after insufflation via TCFP and via gastric body puncture, with no significant difference (p = 0.119). The overall mortality rate was 0 in the first postoperative month, with a 3-month mortality rate of 5% (10/199). The surviving patients showed a significant increase in weight from 51.81 ± 8.52 kg to 52.52 ± 9.39 kg at 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.009).

Conclusions: TCFP for insufflation is safe and effective, with a 100% success rate and no increased risk of complications. The choice of procedure should be based on the patient's specific condition and the physician's experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Medical Research
European Journal of Medical Research 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
247
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信