中国推荐的妊娠期体重增加指南和医学研究所指南对不良出生结局的影响:一项基于人群的队列研究。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Lieping Huang, Ye Huang, Peihan Chi, Yan Zhuang, Xialidan Alifu, Haoyue Cheng, Haibo Zhou, Yiwen Qiu, Libi Zhang, Diliyaer Ainiwan, Zhicheng Peng, Shuting Si, Hui Liu, Danqing Chen, Yunxian Yu
{"title":"中国推荐的妊娠期体重增加指南和医学研究所指南对不良出生结局的影响:一项基于人群的队列研究。","authors":"Lieping Huang, Ye Huang, Peihan Chi, Yan Zhuang, Xialidan Alifu, Haoyue Cheng, Haibo Zhou, Yiwen Qiu, Libi Zhang, Diliyaer Ainiwan, Zhicheng Peng, Shuting Si, Hui Liu, Danqing Chen, Yunxian Yu","doi":"10.1038/s41430-025-01576-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess and compare the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines and the recently published China guidelines regarding their applicability for gestational weight gain (GWG) management among Chinese pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were extracted from the Electronic Medical Record System of Zhoushan, China. Adverse outcomes include small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), low birth weight and macrosomia. GWG were estimated by the China and IOM GWG guidelines, respectively. Multiple logistical regression models were used to analyze the associations of GWG with outcomes. The modified guidelines were developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9975 pregnant women without comorbidities (i.e., gestational diabetes mellitus and pregnancy-induced hypertension), comparing women with normal GWG in both guideline, those with insufficient GWG in the IOM guidelines but normal GWG in the China guidelines were more likely to delivery infants with SGA (aOR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.79); while those with normal GWG in the IOM guidelines but excessive GWG in the China guidelines had an increased risk of LGA (aOR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.98) and macrosomia (aOR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.11, 2.60). Similar results weren't observed among 4438 pregnant women with comorbidities. The modified guidelines were developed by combining the weekly GWG targets from the IOM (bottom values) and the China guidelines (upper values). The modified guidelines with Chinese BMI cut-off points exhibited the highest sensitivity for all adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The China guidelines would better recognize pregnant women at risk of LGA and macrosomia but overlook a subgroup of women at risk of SGA, as recognized by the IOM guidelines. These disparities emphasized neither guidelines may be entirely suitable for GWG management in China. The modified guideline would be more appropriate for Chinese pregnant women, but further validation through research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11927,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of China-recommended gestational weight gain guidelines and the Institute of Medicine guidelines on adverse birth outcomes: A population- based cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Lieping Huang, Ye Huang, Peihan Chi, Yan Zhuang, Xialidan Alifu, Haoyue Cheng, Haibo Zhou, Yiwen Qiu, Libi Zhang, Diliyaer Ainiwan, Zhicheng Peng, Shuting Si, Hui Liu, Danqing Chen, Yunxian Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41430-025-01576-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess and compare the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines and the recently published China guidelines regarding their applicability for gestational weight gain (GWG) management among Chinese pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were extracted from the Electronic Medical Record System of Zhoushan, China. Adverse outcomes include small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), low birth weight and macrosomia. GWG were estimated by the China and IOM GWG guidelines, respectively. Multiple logistical regression models were used to analyze the associations of GWG with outcomes. The modified guidelines were developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9975 pregnant women without comorbidities (i.e., gestational diabetes mellitus and pregnancy-induced hypertension), comparing women with normal GWG in both guideline, those with insufficient GWG in the IOM guidelines but normal GWG in the China guidelines were more likely to delivery infants with SGA (aOR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.79); while those with normal GWG in the IOM guidelines but excessive GWG in the China guidelines had an increased risk of LGA (aOR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.98) and macrosomia (aOR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.11, 2.60). Similar results weren't observed among 4438 pregnant women with comorbidities. The modified guidelines were developed by combining the weekly GWG targets from the IOM (bottom values) and the China guidelines (upper values). The modified guidelines with Chinese BMI cut-off points exhibited the highest sensitivity for all adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The China guidelines would better recognize pregnant women at risk of LGA and macrosomia but overlook a subgroup of women at risk of SGA, as recognized by the IOM guidelines. These disparities emphasized neither guidelines may be entirely suitable for GWG management in China. The modified guideline would be more appropriate for Chinese pregnant women, but further validation through research is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-025-01576-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-025-01576-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估和比较医学研究所(IOM)指南和最近出版的中国指南对中国孕妇妊娠期体重增加(GWG)管理的适用性。方法:数据取自舟山市电子病案系统。不良后果包括小胎龄儿(SGA)、大胎龄儿(LGA)、低出生体重和巨大儿。GWG分别由中国和国际移民组织GWG指南估算。采用多元逻辑回归模型分析GWG与预后的关系。修订后的指导方针已拟订。结果:在9975例无合并症(即妊娠期糖尿病和妊娠高血压)的孕妇中,比较两种指南GWG正常的孕妇,IOM指南GWG不足而中国指南GWG正常的孕妇分娩SGA的可能性更大(aOR = 1.38;95% ci: 1.07, 1.79);IOM指南中GWG正常但中国指南中GWG过高的患者LGA风险增加(aOR = 1.49;95% CI: 1.12, 1.98)和巨大儿(aOR = 1.70;95% ci: 1.11, 2.60)。在4438名有合并症的孕妇中没有观察到类似的结果。修订后的指南是通过结合IOM的每周GWG目标(最低值)和中国指南(最高值)而制定的。采用中国BMI分界点的修订指南对所有不良后果的敏感性最高。结论:中国指南能够更好地识别有LGA和巨大儿风险的孕妇,但忽略了IOM指南所承认的有SGA风险的妇女亚组。这些差异强调了两种指导方针都不完全适合中国的GWG管理。修改后的指南更适合中国孕妇,但需要进一步的研究验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects of China-recommended gestational weight gain guidelines and the Institute of Medicine guidelines on adverse birth outcomes: A population- based cohort study.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess and compare the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines and the recently published China guidelines regarding their applicability for gestational weight gain (GWG) management among Chinese pregnant women.

Method: Data were extracted from the Electronic Medical Record System of Zhoushan, China. Adverse outcomes include small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), low birth weight and macrosomia. GWG were estimated by the China and IOM GWG guidelines, respectively. Multiple logistical regression models were used to analyze the associations of GWG with outcomes. The modified guidelines were developed.

Results: Among 9975 pregnant women without comorbidities (i.e., gestational diabetes mellitus and pregnancy-induced hypertension), comparing women with normal GWG in both guideline, those with insufficient GWG in the IOM guidelines but normal GWG in the China guidelines were more likely to delivery infants with SGA (aOR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.79); while those with normal GWG in the IOM guidelines but excessive GWG in the China guidelines had an increased risk of LGA (aOR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.98) and macrosomia (aOR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.11, 2.60). Similar results weren't observed among 4438 pregnant women with comorbidities. The modified guidelines were developed by combining the weekly GWG targets from the IOM (bottom values) and the China guidelines (upper values). The modified guidelines with Chinese BMI cut-off points exhibited the highest sensitivity for all adverse outcomes.

Conclusion: The China guidelines would better recognize pregnant women at risk of LGA and macrosomia but overlook a subgroup of women at risk of SGA, as recognized by the IOM guidelines. These disparities emphasized neither guidelines may be entirely suitable for GWG management in China. The modified guideline would be more appropriate for Chinese pregnant women, but further validation through research is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (EJCN) is an international, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of human and clinical nutrition. The journal welcomes original research, reviews, case reports and brief communications based on clinical, metabolic and epidemiological studies that describe methodologies, mechanisms, associations and benefits of nutritional interventions for clinical disease and health promotion. Topics of interest include but are not limited to: Nutrition and Health (including climate and ecological aspects) Metabolism & Metabolomics Genomics and personalized strategies in nutrition Nutrition during the early life cycle Health issues and nutrition in the elderly Phenotyping in clinical nutrition Nutrition in acute and chronic diseases The double burden of ''malnutrition'': Under-nutrition and Obesity Prevention of Non Communicable Diseases (NCD)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信