将部落、美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民纳入州综合癌症控制计划。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Dornell Pete, Paige E Farris, Prajakta Adsul, Jennifer W Bea, Dylan Decker, Jalisa Ingram, Jason Semprini, Hailey Baker, Monica Yellowhair, Cecily Blackwater, Craig Dee, Katherine J Briant, Myra Parker, Whitney E Zahnd, Sarah H Nash
{"title":"将部落、美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民纳入州综合癌症控制计划。","authors":"Dornell Pete, Paige E Farris, Prajakta Adsul, Jennifer W Bea, Dylan Decker, Jalisa Ingram, Jason Semprini, Hailey Baker, Monica Yellowhair, Cecily Blackwater, Craig Dee, Katherine J Briant, Myra Parker, Whitney E Zahnd, Sarah H Nash","doi":"10.1007/s10552-025-01981-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>State and District Comprehensive Cancer Control (CCC) plans often do not include priorities for all individuals within their state or district borders. In particular, American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) people experience persistent cancer disparities, yet their inclusion in CCC plans has not been examined. Our study systematically reviewed state and district CCC plans for the inclusion of Tribal-specific cancer control strategies and priorities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A collaborative team of researchers from Tribal serving organizations, cancer centers, and academic institutions conducted a content analysis of state CCC plans to assess terms, concepts, context, and goals related to Tribal populations across twelve domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-three percent (n = 37) of state CCC plans addressed at least one of twelve domain criteria, while 14 states (27%) did not mention Tribal data or priorities. Specifically, the terms \"Indigenous or Native\" (n = 29) or \"American Indian, Indian Country, Reservations, or Indian Health Service\" (n = 27) were referenced most often. Three states met the highest domain criteria (New Mexico, California, Montana). Six states with federally recognized tribes within their borders did not meet any domains (Alabama, Florida, Massachusetts, Missouri, Texas, Virginia).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By highlighting state and Tribal CCC plans' best practices and incorporating Tribal priorities within state and district CCC plans and programs, we underscore the importance of addressing cancer in Tribal populations across the U.S. and offer examples of inclusive CCC plan development and implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The inclusion of tribes and American Indian and Alaska Native People in State comprehensive cancer control plans.\",\"authors\":\"Dornell Pete, Paige E Farris, Prajakta Adsul, Jennifer W Bea, Dylan Decker, Jalisa Ingram, Jason Semprini, Hailey Baker, Monica Yellowhair, Cecily Blackwater, Craig Dee, Katherine J Briant, Myra Parker, Whitney E Zahnd, Sarah H Nash\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10552-025-01981-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>State and District Comprehensive Cancer Control (CCC) plans often do not include priorities for all individuals within their state or district borders. In particular, American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) people experience persistent cancer disparities, yet their inclusion in CCC plans has not been examined. Our study systematically reviewed state and district CCC plans for the inclusion of Tribal-specific cancer control strategies and priorities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A collaborative team of researchers from Tribal serving organizations, cancer centers, and academic institutions conducted a content analysis of state CCC plans to assess terms, concepts, context, and goals related to Tribal populations across twelve domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-three percent (n = 37) of state CCC plans addressed at least one of twelve domain criteria, while 14 states (27%) did not mention Tribal data or priorities. Specifically, the terms \\\"Indigenous or Native\\\" (n = 29) or \\\"American Indian, Indian Country, Reservations, or Indian Health Service\\\" (n = 27) were referenced most often. Three states met the highest domain criteria (New Mexico, California, Montana). Six states with federally recognized tribes within their borders did not meet any domains (Alabama, Florida, Massachusetts, Missouri, Texas, Virginia).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By highlighting state and Tribal CCC plans' best practices and incorporating Tribal priorities within state and district CCC plans and programs, we underscore the importance of addressing cancer in Tribal populations across the U.S. and offer examples of inclusive CCC plan development and implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Causes & Control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Causes & Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-025-01981-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Causes & Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-025-01981-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:州和地区综合癌症控制(CCC)计划通常不包括其州或地区边界内所有个人的优先事项。特别是,美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)经历了持续的癌症差异,但他们在CCC计划中的纳入情况尚未得到检查。我们的研究系统地审查了州和地区的CCC计划,以纳入部落特定的癌症控制策略和优先事项。方法:由部落服务组织、癌症中心和学术机构的研究人员组成的合作小组对州CCC计划进行了内容分析,以评估与12个领域的部落人口相关的术语、概念、背景和目标。结果:73% (n = 37)的州CCC计划涉及12个领域标准中的至少一个,而14个州(27%)没有提到部落数据或优先级。具体而言,“土著或土著”(n = 29)或“美洲印第安人、印第安人国家、保留地或印第安人保健服务”(n = 27)被提及最多。三个州符合最高域名标准(新墨西哥州,加利福尼亚州,蒙大拿州)。有六个州在其边界内有联邦承认的部落,但没有遇到任何领土(阿拉巴马州,佛罗里达州,马萨诸塞州,密苏里州,德克萨斯州,弗吉尼亚州)。结论:通过强调州和部落CCC计划的最佳实践,并将部落优先事项纳入州和地区CCC计划和项目中,我们强调了解决美国部落人口癌症问题的重要性,并提供了包容性CCC计划制定和实施的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The inclusion of tribes and American Indian and Alaska Native People in State comprehensive cancer control plans.

Purpose: State and District Comprehensive Cancer Control (CCC) plans often do not include priorities for all individuals within their state or district borders. In particular, American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) people experience persistent cancer disparities, yet their inclusion in CCC plans has not been examined. Our study systematically reviewed state and district CCC plans for the inclusion of Tribal-specific cancer control strategies and priorities.

Methods: A collaborative team of researchers from Tribal serving organizations, cancer centers, and academic institutions conducted a content analysis of state CCC plans to assess terms, concepts, context, and goals related to Tribal populations across twelve domains.

Results: Seventy-three percent (n = 37) of state CCC plans addressed at least one of twelve domain criteria, while 14 states (27%) did not mention Tribal data or priorities. Specifically, the terms "Indigenous or Native" (n = 29) or "American Indian, Indian Country, Reservations, or Indian Health Service" (n = 27) were referenced most often. Three states met the highest domain criteria (New Mexico, California, Montana). Six states with federally recognized tribes within their borders did not meet any domains (Alabama, Florida, Massachusetts, Missouri, Texas, Virginia).

Conclusion: By highlighting state and Tribal CCC plans' best practices and incorporating Tribal priorities within state and district CCC plans and programs, we underscore the importance of addressing cancer in Tribal populations across the U.S. and offer examples of inclusive CCC plan development and implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Causes & Control
Cancer Causes & Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Causes & Control is an international refereed journal that both reports and stimulates new avenues of investigation into the causes, control, and subsequent prevention of cancer. By drawing together related information published currently in a diverse range of biological and medical journals, it has a multidisciplinary and multinational approach. The scope of the journal includes: variation in cancer distribution within and between populations; factors associated with cancer risk; preventive and therapeutic interventions on a population scale; economic, demographic, and health-policy implications of cancer; and related methodological issues. The emphasis is on speed of publication. The journal will normally publish within 30 to 60 days of acceptance of manuscripts. Cancer Causes & Control publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Commentaries, Opinions, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor which will have direct relevance to researchers and practitioners working in epidemiology, medical statistics, cancer biology, health education, medical economics and related fields. The journal also contains significant information for government agencies concerned with cancer research, control and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信