在定性研究中推进人工智能驱动的专题分析:皮肤利什曼病数据九种生成模型的比较研究。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Issam Bennis, Safwane Mouwafaq
{"title":"在定性研究中推进人工智能驱动的专题分析:皮肤利什曼病数据九种生成模型的比较研究。","authors":"Issam Bennis, Safwane Mouwafaq","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-02961-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As part of qualitative research, the thematic analysis is time-consuming and technical. The rise of generative artificial intelligence (A.I.), especially large language models, has brought hope in enhancing and partly automating thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study assessed the relative efficacy of conventional against AI-assisted thematic analysis when investigating the psychosocial impact of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) scars. Four hundred forty-eight participant responses from a core study were analysed comparing nine A.I. generative models: Llama 3.1 405B, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, NotebookLM, Gemini 1.5 Advanced Ultra, ChatGPT o1-Pro, ChatGPT o1, GrokV2, DeepSeekV3, Gemini 2.0 Advanced with manual expert analysis. Jamovi software maintained methodological rigour through Cohen's Kappa coefficient calculations for concordance assessment and similarity measurement via Python using Jaccard index computations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Advanced A.I. models showed impressive congruence with reference standards; some even had perfect concordance (Jaccard index = 1.00). Gender-specific analyses demonstrated consistent performance across subgroups, allowing a nuanced understanding of psychosocial consequences. The grounded theory process developed the framework for the fragile circle of vulnerabilities that incorporated new insights into CL-related psychosocial complexity while establishing novel dimensions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows how A.I. can be incorporated in qualitative research methodology, particularly in complex psychosocial analysis. Consequently, the A.I. deep learning models proved to be highly efficient and accurate. These findings imply that the future directions for qualitative research methodology should focus on maintaining analytical rigour through the utilisation of technology using a combination of A.I. capabilities and human expertise following standardised future checklist of reporting full process transparency.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"124"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing AI-driven thematic analysis in qualitative research: a comparative study of nine generative models on Cutaneous Leishmaniasis data.\",\"authors\":\"Issam Bennis, Safwane Mouwafaq\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12911-025-02961-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As part of qualitative research, the thematic analysis is time-consuming and technical. The rise of generative artificial intelligence (A.I.), especially large language models, has brought hope in enhancing and partly automating thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study assessed the relative efficacy of conventional against AI-assisted thematic analysis when investigating the psychosocial impact of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) scars. Four hundred forty-eight participant responses from a core study were analysed comparing nine A.I. generative models: Llama 3.1 405B, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, NotebookLM, Gemini 1.5 Advanced Ultra, ChatGPT o1-Pro, ChatGPT o1, GrokV2, DeepSeekV3, Gemini 2.0 Advanced with manual expert analysis. Jamovi software maintained methodological rigour through Cohen's Kappa coefficient calculations for concordance assessment and similarity measurement via Python using Jaccard index computations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Advanced A.I. models showed impressive congruence with reference standards; some even had perfect concordance (Jaccard index = 1.00). Gender-specific analyses demonstrated consistent performance across subgroups, allowing a nuanced understanding of psychosocial consequences. The grounded theory process developed the framework for the fragile circle of vulnerabilities that incorporated new insights into CL-related psychosocial complexity while establishing novel dimensions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows how A.I. can be incorporated in qualitative research methodology, particularly in complex psychosocial analysis. Consequently, the A.I. deep learning models proved to be highly efficient and accurate. These findings imply that the future directions for qualitative research methodology should focus on maintaining analytical rigour through the utilisation of technology using a combination of A.I. capabilities and human expertise following standardised future checklist of reporting full process transparency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895178/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02961-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02961-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:专题分析作为定性研究的一部分,耗时且技术性强。生成式人工智能(ai)的兴起,尤其是大型语言模型的兴起,为增强和部分自动化主题分析带来了希望。方法:在调查皮肤利什曼病(CL)疤痕的社会心理影响时,本研究评估了传统与人工智能辅助主题分析的相对疗效。对一项核心研究的448名参与者的回答进行了分析,比较了9种人工智能生成模型:Llama 3.1 405B、Claude 3.5 Sonnet、NotebookLM、Gemini 1.5 Advanced Ultra、ChatGPT 01 - pro、ChatGPT 01、GrokV2、DeepSeekV3、Gemini 2.0 Advanced与人工专家分析。Jamovi软件通过Cohen的Kappa系数计算来保持方法的严谨性,通过Python使用Jaccard指数计算来进行一致性评估和相似性测量。结果:先进的人工智能模型与参考标准的一致性令人印象深刻;有的甚至具有完全的一致性(Jaccard index = 1.00)。针对不同性别的分析表明,各亚组的表现一致,从而对心理社会后果有了细致入微的了解。扎根的理论过程为脆弱的脆弱圈开发了框架,在建立新的维度的同时,纳入了与cl相关的社会心理复杂性的新见解。结论:这项研究显示了如何将人工智能纳入定性研究方法,特别是在复杂的社会心理分析中。因此,人工智能深度学习模型被证明是高效和准确的。这些发现意味着,定性研究方法的未来方向应侧重于通过使用人工智能能力和人类专业知识相结合的技术来保持分析的严谨性,并遵循标准化的未来报告流程透明度清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancing AI-driven thematic analysis in qualitative research: a comparative study of nine generative models on Cutaneous Leishmaniasis data.

Background: As part of qualitative research, the thematic analysis is time-consuming and technical. The rise of generative artificial intelligence (A.I.), especially large language models, has brought hope in enhancing and partly automating thematic analysis.

Methods: The study assessed the relative efficacy of conventional against AI-assisted thematic analysis when investigating the psychosocial impact of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) scars. Four hundred forty-eight participant responses from a core study were analysed comparing nine A.I. generative models: Llama 3.1 405B, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, NotebookLM, Gemini 1.5 Advanced Ultra, ChatGPT o1-Pro, ChatGPT o1, GrokV2, DeepSeekV3, Gemini 2.0 Advanced with manual expert analysis. Jamovi software maintained methodological rigour through Cohen's Kappa coefficient calculations for concordance assessment and similarity measurement via Python using Jaccard index computations.

Results: Advanced A.I. models showed impressive congruence with reference standards; some even had perfect concordance (Jaccard index = 1.00). Gender-specific analyses demonstrated consistent performance across subgroups, allowing a nuanced understanding of psychosocial consequences. The grounded theory process developed the framework for the fragile circle of vulnerabilities that incorporated new insights into CL-related psychosocial complexity while establishing novel dimensions.

Conclusions: This study shows how A.I. can be incorporated in qualitative research methodology, particularly in complex psychosocial analysis. Consequently, the A.I. deep learning models proved to be highly efficient and accurate. These findings imply that the future directions for qualitative research methodology should focus on maintaining analytical rigour through the utilisation of technology using a combination of A.I. capabilities and human expertise following standardised future checklist of reporting full process transparency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信