迈向个性化的血压时间疗法。

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Germaine Cornelissen, Yoshihiko Watanabe, Larry A Beaty, Kuniaki Otsuka
{"title":"迈向个性化的血压时间疗法。","authors":"Germaine Cornelissen, Yoshihiko Watanabe, Larry A Beaty, Kuniaki Otsuka","doi":"10.1016/j.bj.2025.100849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A consensus regarding the optimal time to administer anti-hypertensive medications has not been reached. Possible differential effects of different anti-hypertensive drugs on the circadian pattern of blood pressure (BP) and differential responses of individual patients receiving the same treatment at different times of the day may partly account for the controversy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) data available at 30-minute intervals for 7 days from previous studies are reanalyzed to compare the effect of five drugs (amlodipine, atenolol, captopril retard, long-acting carteolol, and nilvadipine) taken 1.5 hours after awakening or twice a day on the 24-hour profile of BP from 7 to 13 conventionally diagnosed patients per treatment group. Similar data from 30 patients receiving losartan/hydrochlorothiazide for at least one month at each of six different times in relation to their time of awakening serve to compare the effect of treatment time in different patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Some but not all drugs affected the 24-hour amplitude and/or phase of BP or the contribution of the 12-hour harmonic term to modify the circadian waveform of BP. While evening dosing increased the 24-hour amplitude of BP in some patients, other patients achieved such a desired effect with morning dosing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Personalized optimization of treatment timing to best match a healthy circadian BP pattern is recommended, guided by chronobiological analyses of ABPM data collected over several days in view of the large day-to-day variability in all features of the 24-hour BP rhythm.</p>","PeriodicalId":8934,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"100849"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a personalized chronotherapy of blood pressure.\",\"authors\":\"Germaine Cornelissen, Yoshihiko Watanabe, Larry A Beaty, Kuniaki Otsuka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bj.2025.100849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A consensus regarding the optimal time to administer anti-hypertensive medications has not been reached. Possible differential effects of different anti-hypertensive drugs on the circadian pattern of blood pressure (BP) and differential responses of individual patients receiving the same treatment at different times of the day may partly account for the controversy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) data available at 30-minute intervals for 7 days from previous studies are reanalyzed to compare the effect of five drugs (amlodipine, atenolol, captopril retard, long-acting carteolol, and nilvadipine) taken 1.5 hours after awakening or twice a day on the 24-hour profile of BP from 7 to 13 conventionally diagnosed patients per treatment group. Similar data from 30 patients receiving losartan/hydrochlorothiazide for at least one month at each of six different times in relation to their time of awakening serve to compare the effect of treatment time in different patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Some but not all drugs affected the 24-hour amplitude and/or phase of BP or the contribution of the 12-hour harmonic term to modify the circadian waveform of BP. While evening dosing increased the 24-hour amplitude of BP in some patients, other patients achieved such a desired effect with morning dosing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Personalized optimization of treatment timing to best match a healthy circadian BP pattern is recommended, guided by chronobiological analyses of ABPM data collected over several days in view of the large day-to-day variability in all features of the 24-hour BP rhythm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100849\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2025.100849\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2025.100849","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于服用抗高血压药物的最佳时间尚未达成共识。不同的降压药对血压昼夜节律模式的不同影响,以及在一天中不同时间接受相同治疗的个体患者的不同反应,可能是引起争议的部分原因。方法:重新分析以往研究中每隔7天30分钟的动态血压监测(ABPM)数据,比较5种药物(氨氯地平、阿替洛尔、卡托普利缓释片、长效卡替洛尔和尼伐地平)在醒后1.5小时或每天2次服用对每组7 ~ 13例常规诊断患者24小时血压的影响。来自30名接受氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪治疗至少1个月的患者的类似数据,在6个不同的时间中,每个时间与他们的觉醒时间有关,用于比较治疗时间对不同患者的影响。结果:部分但非全部药物影响血压的24小时振幅和/或相位,或影响12小时谐波项对血压昼夜波形的贡献。虽然晚间给药增加了一些患者的24小时血压振幅,但其他患者在早晨给药时达到了预期的效果。结论:考虑到24小时血压节律的所有特征每天都有很大的变化,建议在对几天内收集的ABPM数据进行时间生物学分析的指导下,个性化优化治疗时机,以最佳地匹配健康的昼夜节律模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward a personalized chronotherapy of blood pressure.

Background: A consensus regarding the optimal time to administer anti-hypertensive medications has not been reached. Possible differential effects of different anti-hypertensive drugs on the circadian pattern of blood pressure (BP) and differential responses of individual patients receiving the same treatment at different times of the day may partly account for the controversy.

Methods: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) data available at 30-minute intervals for 7 days from previous studies are reanalyzed to compare the effect of five drugs (amlodipine, atenolol, captopril retard, long-acting carteolol, and nilvadipine) taken 1.5 hours after awakening or twice a day on the 24-hour profile of BP from 7 to 13 conventionally diagnosed patients per treatment group. Similar data from 30 patients receiving losartan/hydrochlorothiazide for at least one month at each of six different times in relation to their time of awakening serve to compare the effect of treatment time in different patients.

Results: Some but not all drugs affected the 24-hour amplitude and/or phase of BP or the contribution of the 12-hour harmonic term to modify the circadian waveform of BP. While evening dosing increased the 24-hour amplitude of BP in some patients, other patients achieved such a desired effect with morning dosing.

Conclusion: Personalized optimization of treatment timing to best match a healthy circadian BP pattern is recommended, guided by chronobiological analyses of ABPM data collected over several days in view of the large day-to-day variability in all features of the 24-hour BP rhythm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Journal
Biomedical Journal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
128
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Biomedical Journal publishes 6 peer-reviewed issues per year in all fields of clinical and biomedical sciences for an internationally diverse authorship. Unlike most open access journals, which are free to readers but not authors, Biomedical Journal does not charge for subscription, submission, processing or publication of manuscripts, nor for color reproduction of photographs. Clinical studies, accounts of clinical trials, biomarker studies, and characterization of human pathogens are within the scope of the journal, as well as basic studies in model species such as Escherichia coli, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Mus musculus revealing the function of molecules, cells, and tissues relevant for human health. However, articles on other species can be published if they contribute to our understanding of basic mechanisms of biology. A highly-cited international editorial board assures timely publication of manuscripts. Reviews on recent progress in biomedical sciences are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信