末次冰期-全新世旋回中国地下水δ18O分布格局及空间不一致性

IF 3.4 2区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Yanlong Kong, Wuhui Duan, Ke Wang, Zhonghe Pang, Stacey C. Priestley, Xiaoyi Shi, Zongyu Chen, Yakui Chen, Jiyang Wang
{"title":"末次冰期-全新世旋回中国地下水δ18O分布格局及空间不一致性","authors":"Yanlong Kong,&nbsp;Wuhui Duan,&nbsp;Ke Wang,&nbsp;Zhonghe Pang,&nbsp;Stacey C. Priestley,&nbsp;Xiaoyi Shi,&nbsp;Zongyu Chen,&nbsp;Yakui Chen,&nbsp;Jiyang Wang","doi":"10.1029/2024JD042685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The understanding of precipitation δ<sup>18</sup>O variation at the glacial scale has been controversial in paleoclimatology. Groundwater δ<sup>18</sup>O might help provide clarity as they are a widely distributed record of annual weighted mean precipitated δ<sup>18</sup>O. Here, groundwater δ<sup>18</sup>O during the last glacial maximum (LGM) and late Holocene (LH) are first illustrated throughout China based on 158 archived δ<sup>18</sup>O and <sup>14</sup>C measurements. Between LGM and LH, the magnitude of changes in groundwater δ<sup>18</sup>O is higher in North China (NC &gt; 2‰) than South China (SC &lt; 0.5‰). This spatial inconsistency is similar to the seasonal precipitation δ<sup>18</sup>O variations in China caused by changes in atmospheric circulation patterns. Likewise, the difference of groundwater δ<sup>18</sup>O between LGM and LH in NC and SC is attributed to changes in the East Asian summer monsoon (EASM): during the LGM, the EASM was weaker in significantly affecting NC, whereas during the LH, the EASM was stronger and moved northward into NC. This illustrates that although the monsoon strengthens, the higher δ<sup>18</sup>O values in groundwater in NC are still found during the LH than that during the LGM. Furthermore, this spatial difference between NC and SC highlights the importance of moisture sources in affecting precipitation δ<sup>18</sup>O values, implying that the explanation for paleoclimate reconstruction based on stable isotope effects might need careful examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"130 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Groundwater δ18O Distribution Pattern and Spatial Inconsistency Over China During the Last Glacial-Holocene Cycle\",\"authors\":\"Yanlong Kong,&nbsp;Wuhui Duan,&nbsp;Ke Wang,&nbsp;Zhonghe Pang,&nbsp;Stacey C. Priestley,&nbsp;Xiaoyi Shi,&nbsp;Zongyu Chen,&nbsp;Yakui Chen,&nbsp;Jiyang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JD042685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The understanding of precipitation δ<sup>18</sup>O variation at the glacial scale has been controversial in paleoclimatology. Groundwater δ<sup>18</sup>O might help provide clarity as they are a widely distributed record of annual weighted mean precipitated δ<sup>18</sup>O. Here, groundwater δ<sup>18</sup>O during the last glacial maximum (LGM) and late Holocene (LH) are first illustrated throughout China based on 158 archived δ<sup>18</sup>O and <sup>14</sup>C measurements. Between LGM and LH, the magnitude of changes in groundwater δ<sup>18</sup>O is higher in North China (NC &gt; 2‰) than South China (SC &lt; 0.5‰). This spatial inconsistency is similar to the seasonal precipitation δ<sup>18</sup>O variations in China caused by changes in atmospheric circulation patterns. Likewise, the difference of groundwater δ<sup>18</sup>O between LGM and LH in NC and SC is attributed to changes in the East Asian summer monsoon (EASM): during the LGM, the EASM was weaker in significantly affecting NC, whereas during the LH, the EASM was stronger and moved northward into NC. This illustrates that although the monsoon strengthens, the higher δ<sup>18</sup>O values in groundwater in NC are still found during the LH than that during the LGM. Furthermore, this spatial difference between NC and SC highlights the importance of moisture sources in affecting precipitation δ<sup>18</sup>O values, implying that the explanation for paleoclimate reconstruction based on stable isotope effects might need careful examination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"volume\":\"130 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD042685\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD042685","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在古气候学中,对冰川尺度降水δ18O变化的认识一直存在争议。地下水δ18O可能有助于提供清晰度,因为它们是年加权平均降水δ18O的广泛分布记录。本文基于158个已存档的δ18O和14C测量数据,首次对末次盛冰期(LGM)和晚全新世(LH)的地下水δ18O进行了分析。在LGM和LH之间,华北地区地下水δ18O变化幅度较大(NC >;2‰)高于华南(SC <;0.5‰)。这种空间不一致性与大气环流型变化引起的中国季节降水δ18O变化相似。东亚夏季风(EASM)的变化对地下水δ18O的影响也有所减弱,而东亚夏季风(EASM)在东亚夏季风(LGM)期间对华北地区的影响较弱,而在东亚夏季风(LH)期间,东亚夏季风(EASM)增强并向北移动进入华北地区。这说明,尽管季风增强,但东北地区地下水的δ18O值在LH期间仍高于LGM期间。此外,这种空间差异突出了水汽源对降水δ18O值影响的重要性,这意味着基于稳定同位素效应的古气候重建的解释可能需要仔细审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Groundwater δ18O Distribution Pattern and Spatial Inconsistency Over China During the Last Glacial-Holocene Cycle

The understanding of precipitation δ18O variation at the glacial scale has been controversial in paleoclimatology. Groundwater δ18O might help provide clarity as they are a widely distributed record of annual weighted mean precipitated δ18O. Here, groundwater δ18O during the last glacial maximum (LGM) and late Holocene (LH) are first illustrated throughout China based on 158 archived δ18O and 14C measurements. Between LGM and LH, the magnitude of changes in groundwater δ18O is higher in North China (NC > 2‰) than South China (SC < 0.5‰). This spatial inconsistency is similar to the seasonal precipitation δ18O variations in China caused by changes in atmospheric circulation patterns. Likewise, the difference of groundwater δ18O between LGM and LH in NC and SC is attributed to changes in the East Asian summer monsoon (EASM): during the LGM, the EASM was weaker in significantly affecting NC, whereas during the LH, the EASM was stronger and moved northward into NC. This illustrates that although the monsoon strengthens, the higher δ18O values in groundwater in NC are still found during the LH than that during the LGM. Furthermore, this spatial difference between NC and SC highlights the importance of moisture sources in affecting precipitation δ18O values, implying that the explanation for paleoclimate reconstruction based on stable isotope effects might need careful examination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
684
期刊介绍: JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信