Yanlong Kong, Wuhui Duan, Ke Wang, Zhonghe Pang, Stacey C. Priestley, Xiaoyi Shi, Zongyu Chen, Yakui Chen, Jiyang Wang
{"title":"末次冰期-全新世旋回中国地下水δ18O分布格局及空间不一致性","authors":"Yanlong Kong, Wuhui Duan, Ke Wang, Zhonghe Pang, Stacey C. Priestley, Xiaoyi Shi, Zongyu Chen, Yakui Chen, Jiyang Wang","doi":"10.1029/2024JD042685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The understanding of precipitation δ<sup>18</sup>O variation at the glacial scale has been controversial in paleoclimatology. Groundwater δ<sup>18</sup>O might help provide clarity as they are a widely distributed record of annual weighted mean precipitated δ<sup>18</sup>O. Here, groundwater δ<sup>18</sup>O during the last glacial maximum (LGM) and late Holocene (LH) are first illustrated throughout China based on 158 archived δ<sup>18</sup>O and <sup>14</sup>C measurements. Between LGM and LH, the magnitude of changes in groundwater δ<sup>18</sup>O is higher in North China (NC > 2‰) than South China (SC < 0.5‰). This spatial inconsistency is similar to the seasonal precipitation δ<sup>18</sup>O variations in China caused by changes in atmospheric circulation patterns. Likewise, the difference of groundwater δ<sup>18</sup>O between LGM and LH in NC and SC is attributed to changes in the East Asian summer monsoon (EASM): during the LGM, the EASM was weaker in significantly affecting NC, whereas during the LH, the EASM was stronger and moved northward into NC. This illustrates that although the monsoon strengthens, the higher δ<sup>18</sup>O values in groundwater in NC are still found during the LH than that during the LGM. Furthermore, this spatial difference between NC and SC highlights the importance of moisture sources in affecting precipitation δ<sup>18</sup>O values, implying that the explanation for paleoclimate reconstruction based on stable isotope effects might need careful examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"130 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Groundwater δ18O Distribution Pattern and Spatial Inconsistency Over China During the Last Glacial-Holocene Cycle\",\"authors\":\"Yanlong Kong, Wuhui Duan, Ke Wang, Zhonghe Pang, Stacey C. Priestley, Xiaoyi Shi, Zongyu Chen, Yakui Chen, Jiyang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JD042685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The understanding of precipitation δ<sup>18</sup>O variation at the glacial scale has been controversial in paleoclimatology. Groundwater δ<sup>18</sup>O might help provide clarity as they are a widely distributed record of annual weighted mean precipitated δ<sup>18</sup>O. Here, groundwater δ<sup>18</sup>O during the last glacial maximum (LGM) and late Holocene (LH) are first illustrated throughout China based on 158 archived δ<sup>18</sup>O and <sup>14</sup>C measurements. Between LGM and LH, the magnitude of changes in groundwater δ<sup>18</sup>O is higher in North China (NC > 2‰) than South China (SC < 0.5‰). This spatial inconsistency is similar to the seasonal precipitation δ<sup>18</sup>O variations in China caused by changes in atmospheric circulation patterns. Likewise, the difference of groundwater δ<sup>18</sup>O between LGM and LH in NC and SC is attributed to changes in the East Asian summer monsoon (EASM): during the LGM, the EASM was weaker in significantly affecting NC, whereas during the LH, the EASM was stronger and moved northward into NC. This illustrates that although the monsoon strengthens, the higher δ<sup>18</sup>O values in groundwater in NC are still found during the LH than that during the LGM. Furthermore, this spatial difference between NC and SC highlights the importance of moisture sources in affecting precipitation δ<sup>18</sup>O values, implying that the explanation for paleoclimate reconstruction based on stable isotope effects might need careful examination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"volume\":\"130 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD042685\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD042685","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Groundwater δ18O Distribution Pattern and Spatial Inconsistency Over China During the Last Glacial-Holocene Cycle
The understanding of precipitation δ18O variation at the glacial scale has been controversial in paleoclimatology. Groundwater δ18O might help provide clarity as they are a widely distributed record of annual weighted mean precipitated δ18O. Here, groundwater δ18O during the last glacial maximum (LGM) and late Holocene (LH) are first illustrated throughout China based on 158 archived δ18O and 14C measurements. Between LGM and LH, the magnitude of changes in groundwater δ18O is higher in North China (NC > 2‰) than South China (SC < 0.5‰). This spatial inconsistency is similar to the seasonal precipitation δ18O variations in China caused by changes in atmospheric circulation patterns. Likewise, the difference of groundwater δ18O between LGM and LH in NC and SC is attributed to changes in the East Asian summer monsoon (EASM): during the LGM, the EASM was weaker in significantly affecting NC, whereas during the LH, the EASM was stronger and moved northward into NC. This illustrates that although the monsoon strengthens, the higher δ18O values in groundwater in NC are still found during the LH than that during the LGM. Furthermore, this spatial difference between NC and SC highlights the importance of moisture sources in affecting precipitation δ18O values, implying that the explanation for paleoclimate reconstruction based on stable isotope effects might need careful examination.
期刊介绍:
JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.