在津巴布韦的戈纳雷周国家公园,非洲象影响黑犀牛的浏览数量

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Marileen van der Westhuizen, Bruce Clegg, Vernon Visser, Tim O'Connor
{"title":"在津巴布韦的戈纳雷周国家公园,非洲象影响黑犀牛的浏览数量","authors":"Marileen van der Westhuizen,&nbsp;Bruce Clegg,&nbsp;Vernon Visser,&nbsp;Tim O'Connor","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Translocations are essential for the establishment of new populations of the critically endangered black rhinoceros (<i>Diceros bicornis</i>), but success will largely depend on forage availability. We investigated the degree of competition for woody browse between African savanna elephants (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>) and a recently reintroduced population of rhinoceroses in Gonarezhou National Park in Zimbabwe in the dry season of 2022. We examined overlap in space use and selection for plant species, stem diameters, and feeding height by measuring use of shrubs by both species at 75 sites across a range of topo-edaphic conditions. Areas heavily used by rhinoceroses had high shrub densities, were close to water, and were on alkaline soils with elevated conductivity. Sites with medium to high levels of rhinoceros use were nested within areas of high elephant use. We also observed high elephant use in areas not favored by rhinoceroses, occurring farther from water and having lower shrub densities. Both species avoided thickets on acidic soils. There was substantial overlap in feeding areas, the plant species selected, and foraging height, although elephants used stems with larger diameters than rhinoceroses. Feeding by elephants on woody plants often resulted in a proliferation of small-diameter coppice stems, which rhinoceroses used more than non-coppice growth. Elephants did not appear to favor small coppice stems, indicating a degree of elephant-induced facilitation of browse for rhinoceroses. Evidence for competition with elephants indicates black rhinoceroses may be best introduced into areas with a low elephant density.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.22718","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"African elephants influence browse availability for black rhinoceroses in Gonarezhou National Park, Zimbabwe\",\"authors\":\"Marileen van der Westhuizen,&nbsp;Bruce Clegg,&nbsp;Vernon Visser,&nbsp;Tim O'Connor\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jwmg.22718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Translocations are essential for the establishment of new populations of the critically endangered black rhinoceros (<i>Diceros bicornis</i>), but success will largely depend on forage availability. We investigated the degree of competition for woody browse between African savanna elephants (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>) and a recently reintroduced population of rhinoceroses in Gonarezhou National Park in Zimbabwe in the dry season of 2022. We examined overlap in space use and selection for plant species, stem diameters, and feeding height by measuring use of shrubs by both species at 75 sites across a range of topo-edaphic conditions. Areas heavily used by rhinoceroses had high shrub densities, were close to water, and were on alkaline soils with elevated conductivity. Sites with medium to high levels of rhinoceros use were nested within areas of high elephant use. We also observed high elephant use in areas not favored by rhinoceroses, occurring farther from water and having lower shrub densities. Both species avoided thickets on acidic soils. There was substantial overlap in feeding areas, the plant species selected, and foraging height, although elephants used stems with larger diameters than rhinoceroses. Feeding by elephants on woody plants often resulted in a proliferation of small-diameter coppice stems, which rhinoceroses used more than non-coppice growth. Elephants did not appear to favor small coppice stems, indicating a degree of elephant-induced facilitation of browse for rhinoceroses. Evidence for competition with elephants indicates black rhinoceroses may be best introduced into areas with a low elephant density.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"volume\":\"89 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.22718\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22718\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22718","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

易位对于建立极度濒危的黑犀牛(Diceros bicornis)的新种群至关重要,但成功将在很大程度上取决于饲料的可用性。我们调查了2022年旱季在津巴布韦Gonarezhou国家公园非洲稀树草原象(Loxodonta africana)和最近重新引入的犀牛种群之间对木质食物的竞争程度。通过测量75个地点不同地形条件下两种植物对灌木的利用,研究了植物种类、茎粗和取食高度在空间利用和选择上的重叠。犀牛大量使用的地区灌木密度高,靠近水,土壤碱性,电导率高。犀牛使用中高水平的地点位于大象使用高水平的区域内。我们还观察到,在犀牛不喜欢的地区,大象的使用率很高,这些地区离水更远,灌木密度较低。两个种都避开酸性土壤上的灌丛。在觅食区域、选择的植物种类和觅食高度上有很大的重叠,尽管大象使用的茎的直径比犀牛大。大象以木本植物为食,通常会导致小直径乔木茎的繁殖,犀牛比非乔木茎更多地利用这些茎。大象似乎不喜欢小灌木茎,这表明大象在一定程度上促进了犀牛的浏览。与大象竞争的证据表明,最好将黑犀牛引入大象密度低的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

African elephants influence browse availability for black rhinoceroses in Gonarezhou National Park, Zimbabwe

African elephants influence browse availability for black rhinoceroses in Gonarezhou National Park, Zimbabwe

Translocations are essential for the establishment of new populations of the critically endangered black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis), but success will largely depend on forage availability. We investigated the degree of competition for woody browse between African savanna elephants (Loxodonta africana) and a recently reintroduced population of rhinoceroses in Gonarezhou National Park in Zimbabwe in the dry season of 2022. We examined overlap in space use and selection for plant species, stem diameters, and feeding height by measuring use of shrubs by both species at 75 sites across a range of topo-edaphic conditions. Areas heavily used by rhinoceroses had high shrub densities, were close to water, and were on alkaline soils with elevated conductivity. Sites with medium to high levels of rhinoceros use were nested within areas of high elephant use. We also observed high elephant use in areas not favored by rhinoceroses, occurring farther from water and having lower shrub densities. Both species avoided thickets on acidic soils. There was substantial overlap in feeding areas, the plant species selected, and foraging height, although elephants used stems with larger diameters than rhinoceroses. Feeding by elephants on woody plants often resulted in a proliferation of small-diameter coppice stems, which rhinoceroses used more than non-coppice growth. Elephants did not appear to favor small coppice stems, indicating a degree of elephant-induced facilitation of browse for rhinoceroses. Evidence for competition with elephants indicates black rhinoceroses may be best introduced into areas with a low elephant density.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信