时间和种间比较揭示了两个佛罗里达臭鼬物种分布的变化

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Darcy Doran-Myers, Mike N. Gillikin, Mark A. Barrett, Kristen Nelson Sella, Ricardo Zambrano, Megan Wallrichs, Terry J. Doonan, Elizabeth C. Braun de Torrez
{"title":"时间和种间比较揭示了两个佛罗里达臭鼬物种分布的变化","authors":"Darcy Doran-Myers,&nbsp;Mike N. Gillikin,&nbsp;Mark A. Barrett,&nbsp;Kristen Nelson Sella,&nbsp;Ricardo Zambrano,&nbsp;Megan Wallrichs,&nbsp;Terry J. Doonan,&nbsp;Elizabeth C. Braun de Torrez","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the distribution of wildlife species is key to their effective conservation and management. Comparing distributions of similar species can provide valuable insights regarding range overlap and how overlap changes over time. We estimated the geographic distributions of 2 skunk species, the eastern spotted skunk (<i>Spilogale putorius</i>) and the striped skunk (<i>Mephitis mephitis</i>), in Florida, USA, for historical (1997–2002) and contemporary (2017–2022) periods using opportunistic presence data (e.g., public sightings, camera trap records, live trap records). For each species, we produced range models at 2 levels: a generalized boundary (range extent) using a concave hull and a more detailed delineation (occupied range) using kernel density estimation. We expected spotted skunk range to decline (as it has elsewhere), striped skunk range to remain stable, and both species' ranges to have a relatively high geographic overlap. The contemporary models show spotted skunk range encompassing 26% of Florida land area, primarily in southern and coastal Florida, and striped skunk range encompassing 55% of Florida land area, primarily in northern and interior Florida. Range size for spotted skunk declined by approximately 30% between periods, although range expansion occurred in some localized areas. Range size for striped skunk was stable over time, with some localized contractions and expansions. Considerable temporal shifts occurred in skunk distribution, where only 34% of spotted skunk and 54% of striped skunk occupied range remained spatially constant between periods. Divergent geographic use between the 2 species increased over time, yielding a low range overlap of 23% between their contemporary occupied ranges. Our study fills a spatial data gap in skunk research, can inform state- or species-level conservation decisions for spotted skunk, and supports the need for further research on habitat requirements of skunks in Florida.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal and interspecific comparisons reveal shifts in the distributions of two Florida skunk species\",\"authors\":\"Darcy Doran-Myers,&nbsp;Mike N. Gillikin,&nbsp;Mark A. Barrett,&nbsp;Kristen Nelson Sella,&nbsp;Ricardo Zambrano,&nbsp;Megan Wallrichs,&nbsp;Terry J. Doonan,&nbsp;Elizabeth C. Braun de Torrez\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jwmg.22717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Understanding the distribution of wildlife species is key to their effective conservation and management. Comparing distributions of similar species can provide valuable insights regarding range overlap and how overlap changes over time. We estimated the geographic distributions of 2 skunk species, the eastern spotted skunk (<i>Spilogale putorius</i>) and the striped skunk (<i>Mephitis mephitis</i>), in Florida, USA, for historical (1997–2002) and contemporary (2017–2022) periods using opportunistic presence data (e.g., public sightings, camera trap records, live trap records). For each species, we produced range models at 2 levels: a generalized boundary (range extent) using a concave hull and a more detailed delineation (occupied range) using kernel density estimation. We expected spotted skunk range to decline (as it has elsewhere), striped skunk range to remain stable, and both species' ranges to have a relatively high geographic overlap. The contemporary models show spotted skunk range encompassing 26% of Florida land area, primarily in southern and coastal Florida, and striped skunk range encompassing 55% of Florida land area, primarily in northern and interior Florida. Range size for spotted skunk declined by approximately 30% between periods, although range expansion occurred in some localized areas. Range size for striped skunk was stable over time, with some localized contractions and expansions. Considerable temporal shifts occurred in skunk distribution, where only 34% of spotted skunk and 54% of striped skunk occupied range remained spatially constant between periods. Divergent geographic use between the 2 species increased over time, yielding a low range overlap of 23% between their contemporary occupied ranges. Our study fills a spatial data gap in skunk research, can inform state- or species-level conservation decisions for spotted skunk, and supports the need for further research on habitat requirements of skunks in Florida.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"volume\":\"89 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22717\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解野生动物物种的分布是有效保护和管理这些物种的关键。比较同类物种的分布可以提供有关分布区重叠以及重叠如何随时间变化的宝贵见解。我们利用机会性存在数据(如公众目击、相机陷阱记录、活体陷阱记录)估算了美国佛罗里达州两种臭鼬--东部斑臭鼬(Spilogale putorius)和条纹臭鼬(Mephitis mephitis)--在历史时期(1997-2002 年)和当代(2017-2022 年)的地理分布。对于每个物种,我们都建立了两个层次的分布区模型:一个是使用凹壳法建立的广义边界(分布区范围),另一个是使用核密度估计法建立的更详细的划分(占据分布区)。我们预计花斑臭鼬的分布范围会缩小(正如其他地方的情况一样),条纹臭鼬的分布范围会保持稳定,而且这两个物种的分布范围会有相对较高的地理重叠。当代模型显示,花斑臭鼬的分布范围占佛罗里达州陆地面积的 26%,主要分布在佛罗里达州南部和沿海地区;条纹臭鼬的分布范围占佛罗里达州陆地面积的 55%,主要分布在佛罗里达州北部和内陆地区。斑纹臭鼬的分布范围在两个时期之间缩小了约 30%,尽管在一些局部地区分布范围有所扩大。条纹臭鼬的分布范围在不同时期保持稳定,局部地区有所收缩和扩大。花脸鼬的分布发生了很大的时间变化,在不同时期,只有 34% 的花脸鼬和 54% 的条纹花脸鼬的活动范围在空间上保持不变。随着时间的推移,这两个物种之间的地理使用差异越来越大,导致它们在当代占据的范围之间的重叠率很低,仅为 23%。我们的研究填补了臭鼬研究中的空间数据空白,可以为州或物种层面的斑点臭鼬保护决策提供信息,并支持进一步研究佛罗里达州臭鼬栖息地需求的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Temporal and interspecific comparisons reveal shifts in the distributions of two Florida skunk species

Temporal and interspecific comparisons reveal shifts in the distributions of two Florida skunk species

Understanding the distribution of wildlife species is key to their effective conservation and management. Comparing distributions of similar species can provide valuable insights regarding range overlap and how overlap changes over time. We estimated the geographic distributions of 2 skunk species, the eastern spotted skunk (Spilogale putorius) and the striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis), in Florida, USA, for historical (1997–2002) and contemporary (2017–2022) periods using opportunistic presence data (e.g., public sightings, camera trap records, live trap records). For each species, we produced range models at 2 levels: a generalized boundary (range extent) using a concave hull and a more detailed delineation (occupied range) using kernel density estimation. We expected spotted skunk range to decline (as it has elsewhere), striped skunk range to remain stable, and both species' ranges to have a relatively high geographic overlap. The contemporary models show spotted skunk range encompassing 26% of Florida land area, primarily in southern and coastal Florida, and striped skunk range encompassing 55% of Florida land area, primarily in northern and interior Florida. Range size for spotted skunk declined by approximately 30% between periods, although range expansion occurred in some localized areas. Range size for striped skunk was stable over time, with some localized contractions and expansions. Considerable temporal shifts occurred in skunk distribution, where only 34% of spotted skunk and 54% of striped skunk occupied range remained spatially constant between periods. Divergent geographic use between the 2 species increased over time, yielding a low range overlap of 23% between their contemporary occupied ranges. Our study fills a spatial data gap in skunk research, can inform state- or species-level conservation decisions for spotted skunk, and supports the need for further research on habitat requirements of skunks in Florida.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信