硫酸盐还原菌接种物的适宜、易得来源的研究,以及不同ph值下硫酸盐还原率的评价

IF 3.6 4区 生物学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Janet Smith, Craig Sheridan, Lizelle van Dyk, Kevin G. Harding
{"title":"硫酸盐还原菌接种物的适宜、易得来源的研究,以及不同ph值下硫酸盐还原率的评价","authors":"Janet Smith,&nbsp;Craig Sheridan,&nbsp;Lizelle van Dyk,&nbsp;Kevin G. Harding","doi":"10.1111/1758-2229.70081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated the suitability of readily available and naturally occurring sources of microorganisms (inoculum) to use for the cultivation of sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) for acid mine drainage (AMD) remediation. The selected inocula included AMD water (AMD), mud (MUD) and reed-bed mud (RM) from the AMD surrounds, mealworms (MW), cow dung (CD) and raw sewage sludge (RS). The suitability of the different inoculum sources was evaluated by comparing the SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> reduction and sulfide (S<sup>2−</sup>) production rates at three different pHs. Experimental results showed that the AMD, MW, MUD and CD inoculum did not produce appreciable reduction of SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> to S<sup>2−</sup> and were unsuitable sources of SRB inoculum. The inoculum evaluated in pH 2 media did not achieve SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> reduction. Of the inoculum assessed in pH 4 media, only the RM inoculum achieved SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> reduction (40%) with S<sup>2−</sup> production (36 mg/L). In contrast, a notable S<sup>2−</sup> production, RS (114 mg/L) and RM (99 mg/L), accompanied the SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> reduction achieved in the pH 7.5 RS (44%) and RM (30%) samples. The improved S<sup>2−</sup><sub>produced</sub>/SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup><sub>removed</sub> conversion ratios for samples pH 7.5 RS (0.14) and pH 7.5 RM (0.17) are indicative of increased SRB activity and the suitability of these inoculum as SRB sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":163,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Microbiology Reports","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-2229.70081","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of Suitable, Readily Available, Sources of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Inoculum, and Evaluation of Sulfate Reduction Rates Achieved at Different pHs\",\"authors\":\"Janet Smith,&nbsp;Craig Sheridan,&nbsp;Lizelle van Dyk,&nbsp;Kevin G. Harding\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1758-2229.70081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigated the suitability of readily available and naturally occurring sources of microorganisms (inoculum) to use for the cultivation of sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) for acid mine drainage (AMD) remediation. The selected inocula included AMD water (AMD), mud (MUD) and reed-bed mud (RM) from the AMD surrounds, mealworms (MW), cow dung (CD) and raw sewage sludge (RS). The suitability of the different inoculum sources was evaluated by comparing the SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> reduction and sulfide (S<sup>2−</sup>) production rates at three different pHs. Experimental results showed that the AMD, MW, MUD and CD inoculum did not produce appreciable reduction of SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> to S<sup>2−</sup> and were unsuitable sources of SRB inoculum. The inoculum evaluated in pH 2 media did not achieve SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> reduction. Of the inoculum assessed in pH 4 media, only the RM inoculum achieved SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> reduction (40%) with S<sup>2−</sup> production (36 mg/L). In contrast, a notable S<sup>2−</sup> production, RS (114 mg/L) and RM (99 mg/L), accompanied the SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> reduction achieved in the pH 7.5 RS (44%) and RM (30%) samples. The improved S<sup>2−</sup><sub>produced</sub>/SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup><sub>removed</sub> conversion ratios for samples pH 7.5 RS (0.14) and pH 7.5 RM (0.17) are indicative of increased SRB activity and the suitability of these inoculum as SRB sources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Microbiology Reports\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-2229.70081\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Microbiology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-2229.70081\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Microbiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-2229.70081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了易于获得的和自然存在的微生物(接种物)用于培养硫酸盐还原菌(SRB)用于酸性矿井排水(AMD)修复的适用性。选择的接种剂包括AMD水(AMD)、AMD周围的泥(mud)和芦苇床泥(RM)、粉虫(MW)、牛粪(CD)和污水原污泥(RS)。通过比较3种不同ph下的SO42−还原速率和硫化物(S2−)生成速率,评价了不同接种源的适宜性。实验结果表明,AMD、MW、MUD和CD接种剂对SO42−到S2−的还原作用不明显,不适合作为SRB接种剂。在pH为2的培养基中,接种物没有达到SO42−的还原效果。在pH 4培养基中评估的接种物中,只有RM接种物达到了SO42−还原(40%)和S2−生成(36 mg/L)。相比之下,在pH为7.5 RS(44%)和RM(30%)的样品中,显著的S2 -生成,RS (114 mg/L)和RM (99 mg/L),伴随着SO42 -的减少。在pH为7.5 RS(0.14)和pH为7.5 RM(0.17)的样品中,S2 -生成/SO42 -去除转化率提高,表明SRB活性提高,并且这些接种物适合作为SRB来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Investigation of Suitable, Readily Available, Sources of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Inoculum, and Evaluation of Sulfate Reduction Rates Achieved at Different pHs

Investigation of Suitable, Readily Available, Sources of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Inoculum, and Evaluation of Sulfate Reduction Rates Achieved at Different pHs

This study investigated the suitability of readily available and naturally occurring sources of microorganisms (inoculum) to use for the cultivation of sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) for acid mine drainage (AMD) remediation. The selected inocula included AMD water (AMD), mud (MUD) and reed-bed mud (RM) from the AMD surrounds, mealworms (MW), cow dung (CD) and raw sewage sludge (RS). The suitability of the different inoculum sources was evaluated by comparing the SO42− reduction and sulfide (S2−) production rates at three different pHs. Experimental results showed that the AMD, MW, MUD and CD inoculum did not produce appreciable reduction of SO42− to S2− and were unsuitable sources of SRB inoculum. The inoculum evaluated in pH 2 media did not achieve SO42− reduction. Of the inoculum assessed in pH 4 media, only the RM inoculum achieved SO42− reduction (40%) with S2− production (36 mg/L). In contrast, a notable S2− production, RS (114 mg/L) and RM (99 mg/L), accompanied the SO42− reduction achieved in the pH 7.5 RS (44%) and RM (30%) samples. The improved S2−produced/SO42−removed conversion ratios for samples pH 7.5 RS (0.14) and pH 7.5 RM (0.17) are indicative of increased SRB activity and the suitability of these inoculum as SRB sources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Microbiology Reports
Environmental Microbiology Reports ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: The journal is identical in scope to Environmental Microbiology, shares the same editorial team and submission site, and will apply the same high level acceptance criteria. The two journals will be mutually supportive and evolve side-by-side. Environmental Microbiology Reports provides a high profile vehicle for publication of the most innovative, original and rigorous research in the field. The scope of the Journal encompasses the diversity of current research on microbial processes in the environment, microbial communities, interactions and evolution and includes, but is not limited to, the following: the structure, activities and communal behaviour of microbial communities microbial community genetics and evolutionary processes microbial symbioses, microbial interactions and interactions with plants, animals and abiotic factors microbes in the tree of life, microbial diversification and evolution population biology and clonal structure microbial metabolic and structural diversity microbial physiology, growth and survival microbes and surfaces, adhesion and biofouling responses to environmental signals and stress factors modelling and theory development pollution microbiology extremophiles and life in extreme and unusual little-explored habitats element cycles and biogeochemical processes, primary and secondary production microbes in a changing world, microbially-influenced global changes evolution and diversity of archaeal and bacterial viruses new technological developments in microbial ecology and evolution, in particular for the study of activities of microbial communities, non-culturable microorganisms and emerging pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信