冷静与不冷静程序在自闭症谱系障碍儿童化学安全技能教学中的效果

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Kubilay Celik, Seray Olcay
{"title":"冷静与不冷静程序在自闭症谱系障碍儿童化学安全技能教学中的效果","authors":"Kubilay Celik,&nbsp;Seray Olcay","doi":"10.1002/bin.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study examined the effectiveness of the Cool Versus Not Cool (CNC) procedure in teaching chemical safety skills to three preschool children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in terms of acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. One 6-year-old girl and two boys with ASD participated in the study that employed a multiple-probe design across participants. The findings demonstrated that the children with ASD acquired the target safety skills, improved their skills following the study, maintained the skills after one and 4 weeks after the intervention, and generalized them across different individuals. The social validity data, collected through subjective evaluation and a social comparison method, showed that the teachers of the children with ASD had positive opinions regarding the target skills, the CNC procedure, and the study outcomes. Additionally, the children with ASD outperformed their peers after the intervention. Furthermore, the findings indicated that the ecological validity of the CNC was high, particularly in terms of typical settings. Directions and implications for future research are discussed.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47138,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Interventions","volume":"40 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Cool Versus Not Cool Procedure in Teaching Chemical Safety Skills to Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder\",\"authors\":\"Kubilay Celik,&nbsp;Seray Olcay\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bin.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This study examined the effectiveness of the Cool Versus Not Cool (CNC) procedure in teaching chemical safety skills to three preschool children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in terms of acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. One 6-year-old girl and two boys with ASD participated in the study that employed a multiple-probe design across participants. The findings demonstrated that the children with ASD acquired the target safety skills, improved their skills following the study, maintained the skills after one and 4 weeks after the intervention, and generalized them across different individuals. The social validity data, collected through subjective evaluation and a social comparison method, showed that the teachers of the children with ASD had positive opinions regarding the target skills, the CNC procedure, and the study outcomes. Additionally, the children with ASD outperformed their peers after the intervention. Furthermore, the findings indicated that the ecological validity of the CNC was high, particularly in terms of typical settings. Directions and implications for future research are discussed.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Interventions\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.70011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了“酷与不酷”(CNC)程序在三名学龄前自闭症谱系障碍儿童化学安全技能习得、维持和泛化方面的有效性。一名6岁的女孩和两名患有自闭症的男孩参与了这项研究,该研究在参与者中采用了多探针设计。研究结果表明,ASD儿童获得了目标安全技能,并在研究后提高了他们的技能,在干预后1周和4周保持了这些技能,并在不同的个体中推广了这些技能。通过主观评价和社会比较法收集的社会效度数据显示,ASD儿童的教师对目标技能、CNC程序和研究结果持积极态度。此外,自闭症儿童在干预后表现优于同龄人。此外,研究结果表明,CNC的生态有效性很高,特别是在典型设置方面。讨论了未来研究的方向和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effectiveness of Cool Versus Not Cool Procedure in Teaching Chemical Safety Skills to Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

This study examined the effectiveness of the Cool Versus Not Cool (CNC) procedure in teaching chemical safety skills to three preschool children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in terms of acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. One 6-year-old girl and two boys with ASD participated in the study that employed a multiple-probe design across participants. The findings demonstrated that the children with ASD acquired the target safety skills, improved their skills following the study, maintained the skills after one and 4 weeks after the intervention, and generalized them across different individuals. The social validity data, collected through subjective evaluation and a social comparison method, showed that the teachers of the children with ASD had positive opinions regarding the target skills, the CNC procedure, and the study outcomes. Additionally, the children with ASD outperformed their peers after the intervention. Furthermore, the findings indicated that the ecological validity of the CNC was high, particularly in terms of typical settings. Directions and implications for future research are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信