Suqin Huang, Bao Li, Jincheng Liu, Liyuan Zhang, Hao Sun, Yanping Zhang, Jinping Dong, Fuyou Liang, Yanjun Gong, Youjun Liu
{"title":"基于多尺度模型的脑缺血颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥治疗方案","authors":"Suqin Huang, Bao Li, Jincheng Liu, Liyuan Zhang, Hao Sun, Yanping Zhang, Jinping Dong, Fuyou Liang, Yanjun Gong, Youjun Liu","doi":"10.1002/cnm.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Superficial temporal artery and middle cerebral artery (STA–MCA) bypass surgery is an effective method to enhance cerebral blood flow (CBF) in ischemic patients. However, the effectiveness of various bypass techniques varies with the diversity of Circle of Willis (CoW) structures. This study aims to develop a physiologically realistic hemodynamic model to optimize STA–MCA bypass planning for cerebral ischemia patients with different CoW structures. This study developed a 0D–1D geometric multi-scale haemodynamic model that coupled the stenosis model and the cerebral autoregulation model. Based on this model, nine CoW structural models before and after end-to-side (E–S) and side-to-side (S–S) bypass were constructed, and their haemodynamic properties were calculated to evaluate the efficacy of different bypass methods in different CoW structures. The validity of the model and results was verified by clinical data. For the mRACA1, mRACA1–fRPCA1, and mACoA CoW structures, there was a risk of hyperperfusion (13.96%, 12.81%, and −2.64%) after E–S bypass but not S–S bypass. In the mACoA–mLPCoA structure, both bypass techniques posed hyperperfusion risk (112.41% and 30.57%). Other CoW structures showed that E–S bypass could restore CBF without the risk of hyperperfusion. The model's predictions were within 5% of clinical data. The mRACA1, mRACA1–fRPCA1, and mACoA structures were suitable for S-S bypass; the mACoA–mLPCoA structure was not suitable for bypass, and other CoW structures favored E–S bypass. The developed model can effectively simulate the cerebral hemodynamic environment and predict the risk of hyperperfusion, offering valuable insights for personalized bypass planning in cerebral ischemia patients.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50349,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Superficial Temporal Artery–Middle Cerebral Artery Bypass Treatment Planning for Cerebral Ischaemia Based on Multi-Scale Model\",\"authors\":\"Suqin Huang, Bao Li, Jincheng Liu, Liyuan Zhang, Hao Sun, Yanping Zhang, Jinping Dong, Fuyou Liang, Yanjun Gong, Youjun Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cnm.70026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Superficial temporal artery and middle cerebral artery (STA–MCA) bypass surgery is an effective method to enhance cerebral blood flow (CBF) in ischemic patients. However, the effectiveness of various bypass techniques varies with the diversity of Circle of Willis (CoW) structures. This study aims to develop a physiologically realistic hemodynamic model to optimize STA–MCA bypass planning for cerebral ischemia patients with different CoW structures. This study developed a 0D–1D geometric multi-scale haemodynamic model that coupled the stenosis model and the cerebral autoregulation model. Based on this model, nine CoW structural models before and after end-to-side (E–S) and side-to-side (S–S) bypass were constructed, and their haemodynamic properties were calculated to evaluate the efficacy of different bypass methods in different CoW structures. The validity of the model and results was verified by clinical data. For the mRACA1, mRACA1–fRPCA1, and mACoA CoW structures, there was a risk of hyperperfusion (13.96%, 12.81%, and −2.64%) after E–S bypass but not S–S bypass. In the mACoA–mLPCoA structure, both bypass techniques posed hyperperfusion risk (112.41% and 30.57%). Other CoW structures showed that E–S bypass could restore CBF without the risk of hyperperfusion. The model's predictions were within 5% of clinical data. The mRACA1, mRACA1–fRPCA1, and mACoA structures were suitable for S-S bypass; the mACoA–mLPCoA structure was not suitable for bypass, and other CoW structures favored E–S bypass. The developed model can effectively simulate the cerebral hemodynamic environment and predict the risk of hyperperfusion, offering valuable insights for personalized bypass planning in cerebral ischemia patients.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.70026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.70026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Superficial Temporal Artery–Middle Cerebral Artery Bypass Treatment Planning for Cerebral Ischaemia Based on Multi-Scale Model
Superficial temporal artery and middle cerebral artery (STA–MCA) bypass surgery is an effective method to enhance cerebral blood flow (CBF) in ischemic patients. However, the effectiveness of various bypass techniques varies with the diversity of Circle of Willis (CoW) structures. This study aims to develop a physiologically realistic hemodynamic model to optimize STA–MCA bypass planning for cerebral ischemia patients with different CoW structures. This study developed a 0D–1D geometric multi-scale haemodynamic model that coupled the stenosis model and the cerebral autoregulation model. Based on this model, nine CoW structural models before and after end-to-side (E–S) and side-to-side (S–S) bypass were constructed, and their haemodynamic properties were calculated to evaluate the efficacy of different bypass methods in different CoW structures. The validity of the model and results was verified by clinical data. For the mRACA1, mRACA1–fRPCA1, and mACoA CoW structures, there was a risk of hyperperfusion (13.96%, 12.81%, and −2.64%) after E–S bypass but not S–S bypass. In the mACoA–mLPCoA structure, both bypass techniques posed hyperperfusion risk (112.41% and 30.57%). Other CoW structures showed that E–S bypass could restore CBF without the risk of hyperperfusion. The model's predictions were within 5% of clinical data. The mRACA1, mRACA1–fRPCA1, and mACoA structures were suitable for S-S bypass; the mACoA–mLPCoA structure was not suitable for bypass, and other CoW structures favored E–S bypass. The developed model can effectively simulate the cerebral hemodynamic environment and predict the risk of hyperperfusion, offering valuable insights for personalized bypass planning in cerebral ischemia patients.
期刊介绍:
All differential equation based models for biomedical applications and their novel solutions (using either established numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element and finite volume methods or new numerical methods) are within the scope of this journal. Manuscripts with experimental and analytical themes are also welcome if a component of the paper deals with numerical methods. Special cases that may not involve differential equations such as image processing, meshing and artificial intelligence are within the scope. Any research that is broadly linked to the wellbeing of the human body, either directly or indirectly, is also within the scope of this journal.