基于项目的方法在研究线教学过程中提高医学院学生学习成绩:一项准实验研究

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ekaterina Kldiashvili, Ivane Abiatari, Maia Zarnadze
{"title":"基于项目的方法在研究线教学过程中提高医学院学生学习成绩:一项准实验研究","authors":"Ekaterina Kldiashvili,&nbsp;Ivane Abiatari,&nbsp;Maia Zarnadze","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Traditional teaching methods in medical education often fail to engage students or foster critical research skills required for evidence-based medicine. Project-based learning (PBL) is widely recognized for promoting active learning and improving academic performance, although its application in research-focused medical courses remains underexplored, especially in low-resource settings. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PBL in enhancing academic performance and originality compared to traditional literature review-based assessments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A quasi-experimental study was conducted between March 11, 2024 and May 31, 2024, with 179 twelfth-semester medical students divided into two groups: the experimental group (PBL approach, <i>n</i> = 108) and the control group (literature review-based approach, <i>n</i> = 71). Students in the PBL group completed the full research cycle, including topic selection, data collection, analysis, research paper formulation, while the control group focused on synthesizing existing literature. Academic performance (course grades) and originality (Turnitin similarity percentage) were measured. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent samples <i>t</i>-tests, with a significance threshold of <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The PBL group demonstrated significantly higher academic performance (mean: 82.5, median: 85) compared to the control group (mean: 66.5, median: 63.75; <i>t</i>(177) = −20.53, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Similarly, originality improved significantly in the PBL group, with lower similarity scores (mean: 4.17%, median: 4.5%) than the control group (mean: 12.62%, median: 13%, <i>t</i>(177) = 13.74, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Variability in academic performance was slightly higher in the PBL group (standard deviation: 5.80 vs<i>.</i> 4.81), reflecting the individualized nature of PBL.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study confirms that PBL significantly enhances academic performance and fosters originality among medical students, particularly in research-focused courses. The findings underscore the potential of PBL as a transformative approach to medical education, addressing gaps in traditional methods while aligning with global trends in evidence-based practice and academic integrity. PBL is recommended as an adaptable and effective strategy, especially in resource-limited educational settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70562","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Project-Based Approach as Methodology to Improve Academic Performance of Medical School Students Within the Research Line Teaching Course: A Quasi-Experimental Study\",\"authors\":\"Ekaterina Kldiashvili,&nbsp;Ivane Abiatari,&nbsp;Maia Zarnadze\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hsr2.70562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Traditional teaching methods in medical education often fail to engage students or foster critical research skills required for evidence-based medicine. Project-based learning (PBL) is widely recognized for promoting active learning and improving academic performance, although its application in research-focused medical courses remains underexplored, especially in low-resource settings. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PBL in enhancing academic performance and originality compared to traditional literature review-based assessments.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A quasi-experimental study was conducted between March 11, 2024 and May 31, 2024, with 179 twelfth-semester medical students divided into two groups: the experimental group (PBL approach, <i>n</i> = 108) and the control group (literature review-based approach, <i>n</i> = 71). Students in the PBL group completed the full research cycle, including topic selection, data collection, analysis, research paper formulation, while the control group focused on synthesizing existing literature. Academic performance (course grades) and originality (Turnitin similarity percentage) were measured. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent samples <i>t</i>-tests, with a significance threshold of <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The PBL group demonstrated significantly higher academic performance (mean: 82.5, median: 85) compared to the control group (mean: 66.5, median: 63.75; <i>t</i>(177) = −20.53, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Similarly, originality improved significantly in the PBL group, with lower similarity scores (mean: 4.17%, median: 4.5%) than the control group (mean: 12.62%, median: 13%, <i>t</i>(177) = 13.74, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Variability in academic performance was slightly higher in the PBL group (standard deviation: 5.80 vs<i>.</i> 4.81), reflecting the individualized nature of PBL.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study confirms that PBL significantly enhances academic performance and fosters originality among medical students, particularly in research-focused courses. The findings underscore the potential of PBL as a transformative approach to medical education, addressing gaps in traditional methods while aligning with global trends in evidence-based practice and academic integrity. PBL is recommended as an adaptable and effective strategy, especially in resource-limited educational settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70562\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70562\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的医学教育中的传统教学方法往往不能吸引学生或培养循证医学所需的关键研究技能。基于项目的学习(PBL)被广泛认为可以促进主动学习和提高学习成绩,尽管它在以研究为重点的医学课程中的应用仍未得到充分探索,特别是在资源匮乏的环境中。本研究旨在评估PBL与传统的文献综述评估相比,在提高学业成绩和独创性方面的有效性。方法采用准实验方法,于2024年3月11日至2024年5月31日对179名十二学期医学生进行研究,将其分为实验组(PBL法,n = 108)和对照组(文献综述法,n = 71)。PBL组的学生完成了完整的研究周期,包括选题、数据收集、分析、研究论文撰写,而对照组的重点是对现有文献的综合。测量学习成绩(课程成绩)和独创性(Turnitin相似百分比)。数据分析采用描述性统计和独立样本t检验,显著性阈值为p <; 0.01。结果PBL组的学习成绩(平均:82.5,中位数:85)显著高于对照组(平均:66.5,中位数:63.75;T (177) = - 20.53, p < 0.01)。同样,PBL组的独创性显著提高,相似度得分(平均值:4.17%,中位数:4.5%)低于对照组(平均值:12.62%,中位数:13%,t(177) = 13.74, p < 0.01)。PBL组的学习成绩变异性略高(标准差:5.80 vs. 4.81),反映了PBL的个体化性质。结论:本研究证实,PBL显著提高了医学生的学习成绩,培养了他们的独创性,尤其是在研究型课程中。这些发现强调了PBL作为一种变革性医学教育方法的潜力,解决了传统方法的差距,同时与循证实践和学术诚信的全球趋势保持一致。建议将PBL作为一种适应性强且有效的策略,特别是在资源有限的教育环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Project-Based Approach as Methodology to Improve Academic Performance of Medical School Students Within the Research Line Teaching Course: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Background and Aims

Traditional teaching methods in medical education often fail to engage students or foster critical research skills required for evidence-based medicine. Project-based learning (PBL) is widely recognized for promoting active learning and improving academic performance, although its application in research-focused medical courses remains underexplored, especially in low-resource settings. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PBL in enhancing academic performance and originality compared to traditional literature review-based assessments.

Methods

A quasi-experimental study was conducted between March 11, 2024 and May 31, 2024, with 179 twelfth-semester medical students divided into two groups: the experimental group (PBL approach, n = 108) and the control group (literature review-based approach, n = 71). Students in the PBL group completed the full research cycle, including topic selection, data collection, analysis, research paper formulation, while the control group focused on synthesizing existing literature. Academic performance (course grades) and originality (Turnitin similarity percentage) were measured. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent samples t-tests, with a significance threshold of p < 0.01.

Results

The PBL group demonstrated significantly higher academic performance (mean: 82.5, median: 85) compared to the control group (mean: 66.5, median: 63.75; t(177) = −20.53, p < 0.01). Similarly, originality improved significantly in the PBL group, with lower similarity scores (mean: 4.17%, median: 4.5%) than the control group (mean: 12.62%, median: 13%, t(177) = 13.74, p < 0.01). Variability in academic performance was slightly higher in the PBL group (standard deviation: 5.80 vs. 4.81), reflecting the individualized nature of PBL.

Conclusion

This study confirms that PBL significantly enhances academic performance and fosters originality among medical students, particularly in research-focused courses. The findings underscore the potential of PBL as a transformative approach to medical education, addressing gaps in traditional methods while aligning with global trends in evidence-based practice and academic integrity. PBL is recommended as an adaptable and effective strategy, especially in resource-limited educational settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信