探讨共情在早期生活逆境与反社会行为关系中的作用

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Isabella Kahhale, Kelly R. Barry, Desmond C. Ong, Jamil Zaki, Jamie L. Hanson
{"title":"探讨共情在早期生活逆境与反社会行为关系中的作用","authors":"Isabella Kahhale,&nbsp;Kelly R. Barry,&nbsp;Desmond C. Ong,&nbsp;Jamil Zaki,&nbsp;Jamie L. Hanson","doi":"10.1007/s42761-024-00280-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Early life adversity (ELA) refers to stressful childhood experiences such as neglect, abuse, and violence exposure that can profoundly shape behavior. While ELA is consistently linked to antisocial behavior (e.g., aggression, delinquency), the role of empathy in this connection is unclear. Empathy, the ability to understand and resonate with others’ thoughts and emotions, is theoretically linked to antisocial behavior, but empirical work has produced mixed findings. We explore mediation and moderation frameworks to explain the ELA-antisociality link. Using an online sample of 165 adults, we examine three ELA dimensions (unpredictability, threat, and deprivation) and their association with antisocial behavior and empathy through an ecologically valid empathic accuracy task. We also compare this naturalistic measure of empathy with a popular self-report measure of empathy. Results did not support mediation with either operationalization of empathy (i.e., task or self-report), with no direct effects of ELA on empathy or of empathy on antisocial behavior. Empathic accuracy, however, moderated the association between antisocial behavior and both unpredictability and deprivation in childhood. At low levels of empathic accuracy, there was a significant link between adversity and antisocial behavior (unpredictability <i>β</i> = 0.38, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, deprivation <i>β</i> = 0.41, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Empathic accuracy did not moderate an association between threat adversity and antisocial behavior. Notably, across all moderation models, associations were non-significant when the self-report measure of empathy was used. Findings suggest that empathy skills protect against antisocial behavior in the context of unpredictability and deprivation, highlighting the importance of considering dimensions of ELA and ecologically valid, naturalistic empathy measures. Understanding how variations in empathic abilities within ELA dimensions influence antisocial behavior has implications for targeted interventions and promoting emotional well-being in individuals exposed to adversity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72119,"journal":{"name":"Affective science","volume":"6 1","pages":"128 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Role of Empathy in the Association Between Early Life Adversity and Antisocial Behavior\",\"authors\":\"Isabella Kahhale,&nbsp;Kelly R. Barry,&nbsp;Desmond C. Ong,&nbsp;Jamil Zaki,&nbsp;Jamie L. Hanson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42761-024-00280-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Early life adversity (ELA) refers to stressful childhood experiences such as neglect, abuse, and violence exposure that can profoundly shape behavior. While ELA is consistently linked to antisocial behavior (e.g., aggression, delinquency), the role of empathy in this connection is unclear. Empathy, the ability to understand and resonate with others’ thoughts and emotions, is theoretically linked to antisocial behavior, but empirical work has produced mixed findings. We explore mediation and moderation frameworks to explain the ELA-antisociality link. Using an online sample of 165 adults, we examine three ELA dimensions (unpredictability, threat, and deprivation) and their association with antisocial behavior and empathy through an ecologically valid empathic accuracy task. We also compare this naturalistic measure of empathy with a popular self-report measure of empathy. Results did not support mediation with either operationalization of empathy (i.e., task or self-report), with no direct effects of ELA on empathy or of empathy on antisocial behavior. Empathic accuracy, however, moderated the association between antisocial behavior and both unpredictability and deprivation in childhood. At low levels of empathic accuracy, there was a significant link between adversity and antisocial behavior (unpredictability <i>β</i> = 0.38, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, deprivation <i>β</i> = 0.41, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Empathic accuracy did not moderate an association between threat adversity and antisocial behavior. Notably, across all moderation models, associations were non-significant when the self-report measure of empathy was used. Findings suggest that empathy skills protect against antisocial behavior in the context of unpredictability and deprivation, highlighting the importance of considering dimensions of ELA and ecologically valid, naturalistic empathy measures. Understanding how variations in empathic abilities within ELA dimensions influence antisocial behavior has implications for targeted interventions and promoting emotional well-being in individuals exposed to adversity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Affective science\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"128 - 144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Affective science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-024-00280-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affective science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-024-00280-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

早期生活逆境(ELA)是指童年时期的压力经历,如忽视、虐待和暴力暴露,这些经历会深刻地影响行为。虽然ELA一直与反社会行为(如攻击性、犯罪)有关,但移情在这一联系中的作用尚不清楚。同理心,一种理解他人思想和情绪并与之产生共鸣的能力,理论上与反社会行为有关,但实证研究得出了不同的结果。我们探索中介和调节框架来解释ela -反社会性联系。利用165名成年人的在线样本,我们通过生态有效的共情准确性任务,研究了ELA的三个维度(不可预测性、威胁和剥夺)及其与反社会行为和共情的关系。我们还将这种自然的共情测量与一种流行的自我报告共情测量进行了比较。结果不支持共情操作化(即任务或自我报告)的中介作用,ELA对共情或共情对反社会行为没有直接影响。然而,同理心的准确性缓和了反社会行为与童年时期的不可预测性和剥夺之间的联系。在同理心准确性较低的情况下,逆境与反社会行为之间存在显著联系(不可预测性β = 0.38, p < 0.001,剥夺β = 0.41, p < 0.001)。共情准确性并没有调节威胁逆境和反社会行为之间的关联。值得注意的是,在所有的调节模型中,当使用共情的自我报告测量时,关联不显著。研究结果表明,在不可预测性和剥夺的情况下,共情技能可以防止反社会行为,强调了考虑ELA维度和生态有效的自然共情措施的重要性。了解ELA维度内共情能力的变化如何影响反社会行为,对于有针对性的干预和促进逆境个体的情绪健康具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Role of Empathy in the Association Between Early Life Adversity and Antisocial Behavior

Early life adversity (ELA) refers to stressful childhood experiences such as neglect, abuse, and violence exposure that can profoundly shape behavior. While ELA is consistently linked to antisocial behavior (e.g., aggression, delinquency), the role of empathy in this connection is unclear. Empathy, the ability to understand and resonate with others’ thoughts and emotions, is theoretically linked to antisocial behavior, but empirical work has produced mixed findings. We explore mediation and moderation frameworks to explain the ELA-antisociality link. Using an online sample of 165 adults, we examine three ELA dimensions (unpredictability, threat, and deprivation) and their association with antisocial behavior and empathy through an ecologically valid empathic accuracy task. We also compare this naturalistic measure of empathy with a popular self-report measure of empathy. Results did not support mediation with either operationalization of empathy (i.e., task or self-report), with no direct effects of ELA on empathy or of empathy on antisocial behavior. Empathic accuracy, however, moderated the association between antisocial behavior and both unpredictability and deprivation in childhood. At low levels of empathic accuracy, there was a significant link between adversity and antisocial behavior (unpredictability β = 0.38, p < 0.001, deprivation β = 0.41, p < 0.001). Empathic accuracy did not moderate an association between threat adversity and antisocial behavior. Notably, across all moderation models, associations were non-significant when the self-report measure of empathy was used. Findings suggest that empathy skills protect against antisocial behavior in the context of unpredictability and deprivation, highlighting the importance of considering dimensions of ELA and ecologically valid, naturalistic empathy measures. Understanding how variations in empathic abilities within ELA dimensions influence antisocial behavior has implications for targeted interventions and promoting emotional well-being in individuals exposed to adversity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信