Coping strategies and psychological distress in postoperative recovery: A repeated-measures study in women undergoing breast-conserving surgery

Objective

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the standard treatment for early-stage breast cancer, yet patients often experience significant psychological distress and physical symptoms during recovery. This study aimed to explore the relationships between antecedents, physical symptoms (pain and nausea), psychological distress, and coping strategies utilized by women recovering from BCS to improve management of postoperative challenges.

Methods

This repeated-measures descriptive study involved 75 women who underwent BCS with sentinel lymph node biopsy at a National Cancer Institute-designated center. Participants completed the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer and Ways of Coping Instrument on Postoperative Day 1 (POD1) and POD14. Bivariate analyses, multiple linear regression, and structural equation modeling were conducted to evaluate associations between antecedents, coping strategies, and distress. Open-ended responses were qualitatively analyzed for thematic content.

Results

Seeking social support (POD1 mean ​= ​1.25; POD14 mean ​= ​1.20) and planful problem-solving (POD1 mean ​= ​1.19; POD14 mean ​= ​1.04) were the most frequently used coping strategies, while accepting responsibility and confrontive coping were least utilized. Overall coping strategy use decreased between POD1 and POD14, likely reflecting recovery adaptation. Significant predictors of distress included escape-avoidance coping (β ​= ​0.415, P ​< ​0.001), social support (β ​= ​0.270, P ​= ​0.02), history of nausea (β ​= ​0.517, P ​< ​0.001), and age (β ​= ​0.293, P ​= ​0.007). Coping strategies did not mediate the relationship between antecedents and distress.

Conclusions

Adaptive coping strategies such as social support and planful problem-solving play a critical role in mitigating distress during BCS recovery. Interventions should emphasize fostering these strategies and addressing high-risk groups, such as younger patients and those with a history of nausea. Despite limitations, this study underscores the importance of supporting adaptive coping to improve postoperative outcomes and provides a basis for future research.