间伐增加了防护林微生物坏死团对土壤有机碳的贡献

IF 4.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Guifang Wang , Ming Hao , Wenli Zhu , Wei Zhao , Xingjian Dun , Zixu Zhang , Qicong Wu , Peng Gao
{"title":"间伐增加了防护林微生物坏死团对土壤有机碳的贡献","authors":"Guifang Wang ,&nbsp;Ming Hao ,&nbsp;Wenli Zhu ,&nbsp;Wei Zhao ,&nbsp;Xingjian Dun ,&nbsp;Zixu Zhang ,&nbsp;Qicong Wu ,&nbsp;Peng Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Thinning is an essential forest management practice that improves the quality and carbon sequestration capacity of shelter forests, and affects the soil organic carbon (SOC) pool mainly by altering understory hydrothermal conditions and litter inputs. The idea that SOC is divided into two pools, plant and microbial, according to where it comes from, has received general attention. The limited quantitative research on microbial necromass carbon (MNC) and plant necromass carbon(PNC) may hinder our understanding of the mechanisms by which thinning affects the soil carbon pool and forest quality in shelter forests. In this study, we selected shelter forests (mainly <em>Quercus acutissima</em> Carruth and <em>Pinus thunbergii</em> Parl) within 5 years of thinning and used two common biomarkers (e.g. amino sugars and lignin phenols) to quantify the relative changes in MNC and PNC under thinning. Moreover, the mantel-test and random forest models were used to further reveal the relationships among the soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, MNC and PNC. Our results indicated that thinning had a similar effect on the soil carbon pools of <em>Pinus thunbergii</em> Parl (PTP) and <em>Quercus acutissima</em> Carruth (QAC) within 5 years, specifically increasing the contents of the fungal necromass carbon of 10.3 % and 7.3 %, and MNC of 9.2 % and 5.8 %, respectively. PNC did not change within 5 years of thinning, but the monomer content of cinnamyl (0.06 g kg<sup>−1</sup> and 0.08 g kg<sup>−1</sup>), vanillyl (0.17 g kg<sup>−1</sup> and 0.21 g kg<sup>−1</sup>) and syringyl (0.10 g kg<sup>−1</sup> and 0.08 g kg<sup>−1</sup>) in PTP and QAC significantly increased with thinning, respectively. Furthermore, the mantel-test and random forest models showed that the MNC and PNC had different drivers. For MNC, the carbon-to‑nitrogen ratio and pH were the dominant factors, while PNC mainly depended on the regulatory effects of the phylum Firmicutes and total phosphorus. In summary, this study suggested that the effect of thinning on soil carbon sequestration capability in shelter forests is mainly mediated by the regulation of MNC accumulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 106023"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thinning increased the contribution of microbial necromass to the soil organic carbon in shelter forests\",\"authors\":\"Guifang Wang ,&nbsp;Ming Hao ,&nbsp;Wenli Zhu ,&nbsp;Wei Zhao ,&nbsp;Xingjian Dun ,&nbsp;Zixu Zhang ,&nbsp;Qicong Wu ,&nbsp;Peng Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Thinning is an essential forest management practice that improves the quality and carbon sequestration capacity of shelter forests, and affects the soil organic carbon (SOC) pool mainly by altering understory hydrothermal conditions and litter inputs. The idea that SOC is divided into two pools, plant and microbial, according to where it comes from, has received general attention. The limited quantitative research on microbial necromass carbon (MNC) and plant necromass carbon(PNC) may hinder our understanding of the mechanisms by which thinning affects the soil carbon pool and forest quality in shelter forests. In this study, we selected shelter forests (mainly <em>Quercus acutissima</em> Carruth and <em>Pinus thunbergii</em> Parl) within 5 years of thinning and used two common biomarkers (e.g. amino sugars and lignin phenols) to quantify the relative changes in MNC and PNC under thinning. Moreover, the mantel-test and random forest models were used to further reveal the relationships among the soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, MNC and PNC. Our results indicated that thinning had a similar effect on the soil carbon pools of <em>Pinus thunbergii</em> Parl (PTP) and <em>Quercus acutissima</em> Carruth (QAC) within 5 years, specifically increasing the contents of the fungal necromass carbon of 10.3 % and 7.3 %, and MNC of 9.2 % and 5.8 %, respectively. PNC did not change within 5 years of thinning, but the monomer content of cinnamyl (0.06 g kg<sup>−1</sup> and 0.08 g kg<sup>−1</sup>), vanillyl (0.17 g kg<sup>−1</sup> and 0.21 g kg<sup>−1</sup>) and syringyl (0.10 g kg<sup>−1</sup> and 0.08 g kg<sup>−1</sup>) in PTP and QAC significantly increased with thinning, respectively. Furthermore, the mantel-test and random forest models showed that the MNC and PNC had different drivers. For MNC, the carbon-to‑nitrogen ratio and pH were the dominant factors, while PNC mainly depended on the regulatory effects of the phylum Firmicutes and total phosphorus. In summary, this study suggested that the effect of thinning on soil carbon sequestration capability in shelter forests is mainly mediated by the regulation of MNC accumulation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Soil Ecology\",\"volume\":\"209 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106023\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Soil Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325001611\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325001611","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

间伐是改善防护林质量和固碳能力的重要森林经营方式,主要通过改变林下热液条件和凋落物输入来影响土壤有机碳(SOC)库。将有机碳根据来源分为植物和微生物两类的观点受到了普遍关注。微生物坏死体碳(MNC)和植物坏死体碳(PNC)的定量研究有限,可能会阻碍我们对间伐对防护林土壤碳库和森林质量影响机制的认识。在本研究中,我们选择了间伐5年内的防护林(主要是针栎和松),并使用两种常见的生物标志物(如氨基糖和木质素酚)来量化间伐下MNC和PNC的相对变化。此外,利用壁炉试验和随机森林模型进一步揭示了土壤理化性质、微生物群落、MNC和PNC之间的关系。结果表明,间伐对5年内黑松(PTP)和麻栎(QAC)土壤碳库的影响相似,真菌坏死块碳含量分别增加了10.3%和7.3%,MNC含量分别增加了9.2%和5.8%。PNC在疏伐5年内没有变化,但PTP和QAC中肉桂基(0.06 g kg−1和0.08 g kg−1)、香草基(0.17 g kg−1和0.21 g kg−1)和丁香基(0.10 g kg−1和0.08 g kg−1)的单体含量分别随着疏伐而显著增加。此外,壁炉检验和随机森林模型表明,MNC和PNC具有不同的驱动因素。对于MNC,碳氮比和pH是主导因素,而PNC主要依赖厚壁菌门和总磷的调节作用。综上所述,间伐对防护林土壤固碳能力的影响主要是通过调控MNC积累来实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thinning increased the contribution of microbial necromass to the soil organic carbon in shelter forests
Thinning is an essential forest management practice that improves the quality and carbon sequestration capacity of shelter forests, and affects the soil organic carbon (SOC) pool mainly by altering understory hydrothermal conditions and litter inputs. The idea that SOC is divided into two pools, plant and microbial, according to where it comes from, has received general attention. The limited quantitative research on microbial necromass carbon (MNC) and plant necromass carbon(PNC) may hinder our understanding of the mechanisms by which thinning affects the soil carbon pool and forest quality in shelter forests. In this study, we selected shelter forests (mainly Quercus acutissima Carruth and Pinus thunbergii Parl) within 5 years of thinning and used two common biomarkers (e.g. amino sugars and lignin phenols) to quantify the relative changes in MNC and PNC under thinning. Moreover, the mantel-test and random forest models were used to further reveal the relationships among the soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, MNC and PNC. Our results indicated that thinning had a similar effect on the soil carbon pools of Pinus thunbergii Parl (PTP) and Quercus acutissima Carruth (QAC) within 5 years, specifically increasing the contents of the fungal necromass carbon of 10.3 % and 7.3 %, and MNC of 9.2 % and 5.8 %, respectively. PNC did not change within 5 years of thinning, but the monomer content of cinnamyl (0.06 g kg−1 and 0.08 g kg−1), vanillyl (0.17 g kg−1 and 0.21 g kg−1) and syringyl (0.10 g kg−1 and 0.08 g kg−1) in PTP and QAC significantly increased with thinning, respectively. Furthermore, the mantel-test and random forest models showed that the MNC and PNC had different drivers. For MNC, the carbon-to‑nitrogen ratio and pH were the dominant factors, while PNC mainly depended on the regulatory effects of the phylum Firmicutes and total phosphorus. In summary, this study suggested that the effect of thinning on soil carbon sequestration capability in shelter forests is mainly mediated by the regulation of MNC accumulation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信