Yunru Lai , Jonathan J. Ojeda , Simon Clarendon , Nathan Robinson , Enli Wang , Keith G. Pembleton
{"title":"Linking measurable and conceptual phosphorus pools (in APSIM) enables quantitative model initialisation","authors":"Yunru Lai , Jonathan J. Ojeda , Simon Clarendon , Nathan Robinson , Enli Wang , Keith G. Pembleton","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Phosphorus (P) is an essential plant macro-nutrient, yet it is deficient in 65 % of agricultural soils worldwide. Agricultural systems models enable the integration of plant-soil-climate-management interactions to investigate crop responses to P fertilisation and improve P use efficiency. However, current models cannot align their modellable P pools with values obtained from soil tests. This limits their applicability since soil testing is the most widely used tool to assess soil P status, which is then used to predict fertiliser P requirements based on assumed crop P demand for optimal growth in the field. Our study introduces a modelling framework akin to inversely modelling in the Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator (APSIM) to quantitatively derive the most likely P modelling parameters for different soils and empirically link them to common soil P test values. The methodology was first tested using data from an 8-year alfalfa (syn. lucerne) experiment (1997–2004) on two soil types in the mid-west of the United States to establish the adequacy of the P modelling framework in APSIM. We then extended this approach to eight Australian soil types using a simulation study based on known wheat yield response curves to soil P tests to derive empirical relationships between the labile P values in APSIM and common soil test P values (Bray-2 P and Colwell P) for the soils studied. Cross-validation yielded an average <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> of 0.98 and an average Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) of 0.92. Our work thus enables the initialisation of the labile P pool in APSIM using Bray-2 P and Colwell P data, enhancing the usability and accuracy of agricultural systems models in predicting crop P requirements and optimising P fertiliser use across diverse soil types in different agro-climatic regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 106532"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725000868","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
磷(P)是植物必需的宏量营养元素,但全球 65% 的农业土壤都缺乏磷。农业系统模型可以整合植物-土壤-气候-管理之间的相互作用,研究作物对磷肥的反应,提高磷的利用效率。然而,目前的模型无法将其可模拟的钾库与土壤测试得出的值相一致。这就限制了它们的适用性,因为土壤测试是评估土壤钾状况最广泛使用的工具,然后根据假定的作物钾需求量来预测肥料钾需求量,以实现田间最佳生长。我们的研究引入了一个类似于农业生产系统模拟器(APSIM)中反向建模的建模框架,以定量推导出不同土壤最可能的钾建模参数,并将其与常见的土壤钾测试值联系起来。该方法首先利用美国中西部两种土壤类型的 8 年紫花苜蓿(同义词:苜蓿)试验(1997-2004 年)数据进行了测试,以确定 APSIM 中的 P 建模框架是否适当。然后,我们根据已知的小麦产量对土壤钾测试的响应曲线进行模拟研究,将这一方法推广到澳大利亚的八种土壤类型,从而得出 APSIM 中的可变钾值与所研究土壤的常见土壤测试钾值(Bray-2 P 和 Colwell P)之间的经验关系。交叉验证的平均 R2 为 0.98,平均林氏协和相关系数 (CCC) 为 0.92。因此,我们的工作能够利用 Bray-2 P 和 Colwell P 数据在 APSIM 中初始化可移动 P 池,从而提高农业系统模型的可用性和准确性,以预测作物对 P 的需求,并优化不同农业气候地区不同土壤类型中 P 肥料的使用。
Linking measurable and conceptual phosphorus pools (in APSIM) enables quantitative model initialisation
Phosphorus (P) is an essential plant macro-nutrient, yet it is deficient in 65 % of agricultural soils worldwide. Agricultural systems models enable the integration of plant-soil-climate-management interactions to investigate crop responses to P fertilisation and improve P use efficiency. However, current models cannot align their modellable P pools with values obtained from soil tests. This limits their applicability since soil testing is the most widely used tool to assess soil P status, which is then used to predict fertiliser P requirements based on assumed crop P demand for optimal growth in the field. Our study introduces a modelling framework akin to inversely modelling in the Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator (APSIM) to quantitatively derive the most likely P modelling parameters for different soils and empirically link them to common soil P test values. The methodology was first tested using data from an 8-year alfalfa (syn. lucerne) experiment (1997–2004) on two soil types in the mid-west of the United States to establish the adequacy of the P modelling framework in APSIM. We then extended this approach to eight Australian soil types using a simulation study based on known wheat yield response curves to soil P tests to derive empirical relationships between the labile P values in APSIM and common soil test P values (Bray-2 P and Colwell P) for the soils studied. Cross-validation yielded an average R2 of 0.98 and an average Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) of 0.92. Our work thus enables the initialisation of the labile P pool in APSIM using Bray-2 P and Colwell P data, enhancing the usability and accuracy of agricultural systems models in predicting crop P requirements and optimising P fertiliser use across diverse soil types in different agro-climatic regions.
期刊介绍:
Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research:
The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.