针对COVID-19的数字接触者追踪干预措施的有效性:系统性范围评估

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ha-Linh Quach , Erin I. Walsh , Thi Ngoc Anh Hoang , Richard Norman Leslie Terrett , Florian Vogt
{"title":"针对COVID-19的数字接触者追踪干预措施的有效性:系统性范围评估","authors":"Ha-Linh Quach ,&nbsp;Erin I. Walsh ,&nbsp;Thi Ngoc Anh Hoang ,&nbsp;Richard Norman Leslie Terrett ,&nbsp;Florian Vogt","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.02.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Digital contact tracing (DCT) interventions have been deployed at unprecedented scale during COVID-19. However, no comprehensive appraisal of the evidence exists to date regarding their effectiveness. We aimed to systematically review the global literature for a holistic understanding of DCT effectiveness during COVID-19, and to identify factors that enabled or hindered its effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Systematic scoping review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched six databases for peer-reviewed literature relevant to the evaluation of DCT interventions during COVID-19 (January 2024) (CRD42021268586). We compiled implemented DCT interventions from grey literature. Effectiveness appraisals, different operationalizations, measurements, and definitions of DCT effectiveness, as well as associated factors were synthesized qualitatively. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We followed Cochrane and PRISMA guidance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 133 studies evaluating 121 different DCT implementations. Seventy-three (60 %) studies found DCT to be effective, mostly when evaluating epidemiological impact metrics. Public trust emerged as crucial for DCT to be effective, which requires high and enforceable data safety and privacy standards, clear and transparent communication, high accuracy and reliability of the intervention, and an acceptance-enhancing implementation approach of other pandemic response measures by public health authorities more broadly. Most evaluations took place in high rather than low-resource settings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While technical performance matters, DCT effectiveness primarily depends on a relatively small number of non-technical drivers centred around public trust. DCT should only be implemented as integrated part of a broader public health framework. Our findings hold important insights for the design, implementation, and evaluation of other digital technology for pandemic response.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"242 ","pages":"Pages 146-156"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of digital contact tracing interventions for COVID-19: A systematic scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Ha-Linh Quach ,&nbsp;Erin I. Walsh ,&nbsp;Thi Ngoc Anh Hoang ,&nbsp;Richard Norman Leslie Terrett ,&nbsp;Florian Vogt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.02.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Digital contact tracing (DCT) interventions have been deployed at unprecedented scale during COVID-19. However, no comprehensive appraisal of the evidence exists to date regarding their effectiveness. We aimed to systematically review the global literature for a holistic understanding of DCT effectiveness during COVID-19, and to identify factors that enabled or hindered its effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Systematic scoping review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched six databases for peer-reviewed literature relevant to the evaluation of DCT interventions during COVID-19 (January 2024) (CRD42021268586). We compiled implemented DCT interventions from grey literature. Effectiveness appraisals, different operationalizations, measurements, and definitions of DCT effectiveness, as well as associated factors were synthesized qualitatively. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We followed Cochrane and PRISMA guidance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 133 studies evaluating 121 different DCT implementations. Seventy-three (60 %) studies found DCT to be effective, mostly when evaluating epidemiological impact metrics. Public trust emerged as crucial for DCT to be effective, which requires high and enforceable data safety and privacy standards, clear and transparent communication, high accuracy and reliability of the intervention, and an acceptance-enhancing implementation approach of other pandemic response measures by public health authorities more broadly. Most evaluations took place in high rather than low-resource settings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While technical performance matters, DCT effectiveness primarily depends on a relatively small number of non-technical drivers centred around public trust. DCT should only be implemented as integrated part of a broader public health framework. Our findings hold important insights for the design, implementation, and evaluation of other digital technology for pandemic response.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health\",\"volume\":\"242 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 146-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625000927\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625000927","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的2019冠状病毒病期间,数字接触者追踪(DCT)干预措施的部署规模空前。然而,迄今为止还没有对其有效性的证据进行全面的评估。我们的目的是系统地回顾全球文献,以全面了解COVID-19期间DCT的有效性,并确定促进或阻碍其有效性的因素。研究设计系统的范围评估。方法检索6个数据库,检索与COVID-19(2024年1月)期间DCT干预评估相关的同行评审文献(CRD42021268586)。我们从灰色文献中汇编了已实施的DCT干预措施。定性地综合了有效性评价、不同的操作方式、测量和DCT有效性的定义以及相关因素。采用混合方法评价工具评价研究质量。我们遵循Cochrane和PRISMA的指导。我们确定了133项研究,评估了121种不同的DCT实施。73项(60%)研究发现DCT是有效的,主要是在评估流行病学影响指标时。公众信任对DCT的有效性至关重要,这需要高水平和可执行的数据安全和隐私标准、清晰透明的沟通、干预措施的高准确性和可靠性,以及更广泛的公共卫生当局对其他大流行应对措施采取提高接受度的实施方法。大多数评价是在资源丰富而不是资源匮乏的环境中进行的。虽然技术绩效很重要,但DCT的有效性主要取决于以公众信任为中心的相对较少的非技术驱动因素。DCT只应作为更广泛的公共卫生框架的一个组成部分加以实施。我们的研究结果对设计、实施和评估其他用于大流行应对的数字技术具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effectiveness of digital contact tracing interventions for COVID-19: A systematic scoping review

Effectiveness of digital contact tracing interventions for COVID-19: A systematic scoping review

Objectives

Digital contact tracing (DCT) interventions have been deployed at unprecedented scale during COVID-19. However, no comprehensive appraisal of the evidence exists to date regarding their effectiveness. We aimed to systematically review the global literature for a holistic understanding of DCT effectiveness during COVID-19, and to identify factors that enabled or hindered its effectiveness.

Study design

Systematic scoping review.

Methods

We searched six databases for peer-reviewed literature relevant to the evaluation of DCT interventions during COVID-19 (January 2024) (CRD42021268586). We compiled implemented DCT interventions from grey literature. Effectiveness appraisals, different operationalizations, measurements, and definitions of DCT effectiveness, as well as associated factors were synthesized qualitatively. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We followed Cochrane and PRISMA guidance.

Results

We identified 133 studies evaluating 121 different DCT implementations. Seventy-three (60 %) studies found DCT to be effective, mostly when evaluating epidemiological impact metrics. Public trust emerged as crucial for DCT to be effective, which requires high and enforceable data safety and privacy standards, clear and transparent communication, high accuracy and reliability of the intervention, and an acceptance-enhancing implementation approach of other pandemic response measures by public health authorities more broadly. Most evaluations took place in high rather than low-resource settings.

Conclusion

While technical performance matters, DCT effectiveness primarily depends on a relatively small number of non-technical drivers centred around public trust. DCT should only be implemented as integrated part of a broader public health framework. Our findings hold important insights for the design, implementation, and evaluation of other digital technology for pandemic response.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信