美国碳政策下可持续塑料废物管理转型设计

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Oluwadare Badejo, Borja Hernández and Marianthi Ierapetritou*, 
{"title":"美国碳政策下可持续塑料废物管理转型设计","authors":"Oluwadare Badejo,&nbsp;Borja Hernández and Marianthi Ierapetritou*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.iecr.4c0394210.1021/acs.iecr.4c03942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The growing environmental and economic challenges posed by plastic waste demand innovative and strategic solutions. This study presents a decision-making framework using mathematical programming to determine the technologies, their location, and the transportation method (electric or with conventional trucks) under different scenarios: maximizing profit, maximizing decarbonization, maximizing plastic circularity, and maximizing profit under carbon tax and carbon cap policies. Results suggest upcycling by pyrolysis for maximizing profit; hydrocracking and mechanical recycling for maximizing the decarbonization; hydrocracking, pyrolysis, and mechanical recycling for carbon tax and carbon cap schemes; and mechanical recycling combined with chemical recycling for maximizing circularity. These results highlight the challenges of simultaneously maximizing circularity and meeting the 2050 decarbonization targets proposed by the Paris agreement as chemical recycling involves pyrolysis, a highly energy intensive technology. The assessment of the policies shows that current carbon taxes are not sufficient for achieving those decarbonization targets. To address this, either higher taxes or a carbon cap policy mechanism are needed with four recommended technologies: upcycling based on pyrolysis and hydrocracking, chemical recycling, and mechanical recycling.</p>","PeriodicalId":39,"journal":{"name":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","volume":"64 10","pages":"5476–5492 5476–5492"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design of the Transition for Sustainable Plastic Waste Management under Carbon Policies in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Oluwadare Badejo,&nbsp;Borja Hernández and Marianthi Ierapetritou*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.iecr.4c0394210.1021/acs.iecr.4c03942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The growing environmental and economic challenges posed by plastic waste demand innovative and strategic solutions. This study presents a decision-making framework using mathematical programming to determine the technologies, their location, and the transportation method (electric or with conventional trucks) under different scenarios: maximizing profit, maximizing decarbonization, maximizing plastic circularity, and maximizing profit under carbon tax and carbon cap policies. Results suggest upcycling by pyrolysis for maximizing profit; hydrocracking and mechanical recycling for maximizing the decarbonization; hydrocracking, pyrolysis, and mechanical recycling for carbon tax and carbon cap schemes; and mechanical recycling combined with chemical recycling for maximizing circularity. These results highlight the challenges of simultaneously maximizing circularity and meeting the 2050 decarbonization targets proposed by the Paris agreement as chemical recycling involves pyrolysis, a highly energy intensive technology. The assessment of the policies shows that current carbon taxes are not sufficient for achieving those decarbonization targets. To address this, either higher taxes or a carbon cap policy mechanism are needed with four recommended technologies: upcycling based on pyrolysis and hydrocracking, chemical recycling, and mechanical recycling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research\",\"volume\":\"64 10\",\"pages\":\"5476–5492 5476–5492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c03942\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c03942","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

塑料废物带来的日益严峻的环境和经济挑战需要创新和战略解决方案。本研究提出了一个决策框架,使用数学规划来确定不同情景下的技术、位置和运输方式(电动或传统卡车):最大化利润、最大化脱碳、最大化塑料循环、最大化碳税和碳上限政策下的利润。结果表明,热解升级回收可实现利润最大化;加氢裂化和机械回收,最大限度地实现脱碳;加氢裂化、热解和机械回收用于碳税和碳上限计划;机械回收与化学回收相结合,使循环最大化。这些结果凸显了同时最大化循环和满足《巴黎协定》提出的2050年脱碳目标的挑战,因为化学回收涉及热解,这是一种高能耗技术。对政策的评估表明,目前的碳税不足以实现这些脱碳目标。为了解决这个问题,要么提高税收,要么制定碳上限政策机制,建议采用四种技术:基于热解和加氢裂化的升级回收、化学回收和机械回收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Design of the Transition for Sustainable Plastic Waste Management under Carbon Policies in the United States

Design of the Transition for Sustainable Plastic Waste Management under Carbon Policies in the United States

The growing environmental and economic challenges posed by plastic waste demand innovative and strategic solutions. This study presents a decision-making framework using mathematical programming to determine the technologies, their location, and the transportation method (electric or with conventional trucks) under different scenarios: maximizing profit, maximizing decarbonization, maximizing plastic circularity, and maximizing profit under carbon tax and carbon cap policies. Results suggest upcycling by pyrolysis for maximizing profit; hydrocracking and mechanical recycling for maximizing the decarbonization; hydrocracking, pyrolysis, and mechanical recycling for carbon tax and carbon cap schemes; and mechanical recycling combined with chemical recycling for maximizing circularity. These results highlight the challenges of simultaneously maximizing circularity and meeting the 2050 decarbonization targets proposed by the Paris agreement as chemical recycling involves pyrolysis, a highly energy intensive technology. The assessment of the policies shows that current carbon taxes are not sufficient for achieving those decarbonization targets. To address this, either higher taxes or a carbon cap policy mechanism are needed with four recommended technologies: upcycling based on pyrolysis and hydrocracking, chemical recycling, and mechanical recycling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1467
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: ndustrial & Engineering Chemistry, with variations in title and format, has been published since 1909 by the American Chemical Society. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research is a weekly publication that reports industrial and academic research in the broad fields of applied chemistry and chemical engineering with special focus on fundamentals, processes, and products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信