高浓度凝血酶时间与爬行酶时间比的分析验证:一种建议用于监测低纤维蛋白原水平患者未分离肝素的检测方法。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Pornnapa Police, Phichchapha Noikongdee, Tichayapa Phojanasenee, Wittawat Chantkran, Dollapak Apipongrat
{"title":"高浓度凝血酶时间与爬行酶时间比的分析验证:一种建议用于监测低纤维蛋白原水平患者未分离肝素的检测方法。","authors":"Pornnapa Police,&nbsp;Phichchapha Noikongdee,&nbsp;Tichayapa Phojanasenee,&nbsp;Wittawat Chantkran,&nbsp;Dollapak Apipongrat","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of the high-concentrated thrombin time-to-reptilase time (hcTT/RT) ratio as a novel assay to neutralize fibrinogen effects and improve accuracy in unfractionated heparin (UFH) monitoring and to validate its use in clinical samples with low fibrinogen levels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 240 heparin-spiked plasma samples, prepared from 30 normal plasma samples with varying UFH concentrations, were analyzed. The hcTT/RT ratio's correlation with anti-FXa activity and its sensitivity and specificity were compared with the hcTT assay. Additionally, 89 clinical samples from UFH-treated patients with low fibrinogen levels were analyzed to validate the assay in clinical settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Both hcTT and the hcTT/RT ratio demonstrated strong correlations with anti-FXa activity (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.76 and 0.75, respectively). The hcTT/RT ratio outperformed hcTT in detecting subtherapeutic UFH levels, achieving higher diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.99 vs. 0.98, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), greater sensitivity (89.2% vs. 86.7%), and perfect specificity (100.0% vs. 98.3%), with comparable performance for supratherapeutic UFH levels. Notably, the hcTT/RT ratio remained unaffected by low fibrinogen concentrations. In the validation study, the hcTT/RT ratio showed a stronger correlation with anti-FXa activity than activated partial thromboplastin time and hcTT alone (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.72 vs. 0.63 and 0.72 vs. 0.67, respectively) and had no significant correlation with fibrinogen levels (Spearman's <i>r</i> = −0.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The hcTT/RT ratio is a reliable assay for monitoring UFH, especially in patients with low fibrinogen levels. Further large-scale clinical studies are needed to evaluate its practical application in clinical settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14120,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","volume":"47 4","pages":"738-747"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytical Validation of the High Concentrated Thrombin Time-To-Reptilase Time Ratio: A Proposed Assay for Monitoring Unfractionated Heparin in Patients With Low Fibrinogen Levels\",\"authors\":\"Pornnapa Police,&nbsp;Phichchapha Noikongdee,&nbsp;Tichayapa Phojanasenee,&nbsp;Wittawat Chantkran,&nbsp;Dollapak Apipongrat\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijlh.14459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of the high-concentrated thrombin time-to-reptilase time (hcTT/RT) ratio as a novel assay to neutralize fibrinogen effects and improve accuracy in unfractionated heparin (UFH) monitoring and to validate its use in clinical samples with low fibrinogen levels.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 240 heparin-spiked plasma samples, prepared from 30 normal plasma samples with varying UFH concentrations, were analyzed. The hcTT/RT ratio's correlation with anti-FXa activity and its sensitivity and specificity were compared with the hcTT assay. Additionally, 89 clinical samples from UFH-treated patients with low fibrinogen levels were analyzed to validate the assay in clinical settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Both hcTT and the hcTT/RT ratio demonstrated strong correlations with anti-FXa activity (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.76 and 0.75, respectively). The hcTT/RT ratio outperformed hcTT in detecting subtherapeutic UFH levels, achieving higher diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.99 vs. 0.98, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), greater sensitivity (89.2% vs. 86.7%), and perfect specificity (100.0% vs. 98.3%), with comparable performance for supratherapeutic UFH levels. Notably, the hcTT/RT ratio remained unaffected by low fibrinogen concentrations. In the validation study, the hcTT/RT ratio showed a stronger correlation with anti-FXa activity than activated partial thromboplastin time and hcTT alone (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.72 vs. 0.63 and 0.72 vs. 0.67, respectively) and had no significant correlation with fibrinogen levels (Spearman's <i>r</i> = −0.01).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The hcTT/RT ratio is a reliable assay for monitoring UFH, especially in patients with low fibrinogen levels. Further large-scale clinical studies are needed to evaluate its practical application in clinical settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"738-747\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14459\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14459","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估高浓度凝血酶时间/爬行酶时间(hcTT/RT)比作为一种新的分析方法的分析性能,以中和纤维蛋白原效应,提高未分离肝素(UFH)监测的准确性,并验证其在低纤维蛋白原水平的临床样品中的应用。方法:从30份不同UFH浓度的正常血浆样品中制备240份加肝素血浆样品进行分析。比较hcTT/RT比值与抗fxa活性的相关性及其敏感性和特异性。此外,89例来自ufh治疗的低纤维蛋白原水平患者的临床样本进行了分析,以验证该方法在临床环境中的有效性。结果:hcTT和hcTT/RT比值均与抗fxa活性有较强的相关性(R2分别为0.76和0.75)。hcTT/RT比值在检测亚治疗期UFH水平方面优于hcTT,获得更高的诊断准确性(AUC分别为0.99 vs 0.98, p 2 = 0.72 vs 0.63, 0.72 vs 0.67),且与纤维蛋白原水平无显著相关性(Spearman’s r = -0.01)。结论:hcTT/RT比值是监测UFH的可靠方法,特别是在纤维蛋白原水平较低的患者中。需要进一步的大规模临床研究来评估其在临床环境中的实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analytical Validation of the High Concentrated Thrombin Time-To-Reptilase Time Ratio: A Proposed Assay for Monitoring Unfractionated Heparin in Patients With Low Fibrinogen Levels

Introduction

This study aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of the high-concentrated thrombin time-to-reptilase time (hcTT/RT) ratio as a novel assay to neutralize fibrinogen effects and improve accuracy in unfractionated heparin (UFH) monitoring and to validate its use in clinical samples with low fibrinogen levels.

Methods

A total of 240 heparin-spiked plasma samples, prepared from 30 normal plasma samples with varying UFH concentrations, were analyzed. The hcTT/RT ratio's correlation with anti-FXa activity and its sensitivity and specificity were compared with the hcTT assay. Additionally, 89 clinical samples from UFH-treated patients with low fibrinogen levels were analyzed to validate the assay in clinical settings.

Results

Both hcTT and the hcTT/RT ratio demonstrated strong correlations with anti-FXa activity (R2 = 0.76 and 0.75, respectively). The hcTT/RT ratio outperformed hcTT in detecting subtherapeutic UFH levels, achieving higher diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.99 vs. 0.98, p < 0.001), greater sensitivity (89.2% vs. 86.7%), and perfect specificity (100.0% vs. 98.3%), with comparable performance for supratherapeutic UFH levels. Notably, the hcTT/RT ratio remained unaffected by low fibrinogen concentrations. In the validation study, the hcTT/RT ratio showed a stronger correlation with anti-FXa activity than activated partial thromboplastin time and hcTT alone (R2 = 0.72 vs. 0.63 and 0.72 vs. 0.67, respectively) and had no significant correlation with fibrinogen levels (Spearman's r = −0.01).

Conclusions

The hcTT/RT ratio is a reliable assay for monitoring UFH, especially in patients with low fibrinogen levels. Further large-scale clinical studies are needed to evaluate its practical application in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology provides a forum for the communication of new developments, research topics and the practice of laboratory haematology. The journal publishes invited reviews, full length original articles, and correspondence. The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology is the official journal of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology, which addresses the following sub-disciplines: cellular analysis, flow cytometry, haemostasis and thrombosis, molecular diagnostics, haematology informatics, haemoglobinopathies, point of care testing, standards and guidelines. The journal was launched in 2006 as the successor to Clinical and Laboratory Hematology, which was first published in 1979. An active and positive editorial policy ensures that work of a high scientific standard is reported, in order to bridge the gap between practical and academic aspects of laboratory haematology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信