头孢他啶-阿维巴坦与以碳青霉烯为基础的方案治疗医院耐碳青霉烯肺炎克雷伯菌血液感染的有效性比较。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Ruei-Chang Huang , Li-Ying Chen , Ying-Chuan Wang , Chun-Hsiang Chiu
{"title":"头孢他啶-阿维巴坦与以碳青霉烯为基础的方案治疗医院耐碳青霉烯肺炎克雷伯菌血液感染的有效性比较。","authors":"Ruei-Chang Huang ,&nbsp;Li-Ying Chen ,&nbsp;Ying-Chuan Wang ,&nbsp;Chun-Hsiang Chiu","doi":"10.1016/j.jmii.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Carbapenem-resistant <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em> bloodstream infections (CRKP BSI) are associated with high mortality rates and limited treatment options. This study compared the outcomes between ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenem-based regimens in patients with nosocomial CRKP BSI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a single-center, retrospective, observational study that analyzed adult patients with nosocomial CRKP BSI from January 2018 to December 2023. Patients were divided into ceftazidime-avibactam (n = 47) and carbapenem-based regimen (n = 54) groups. Primary outcomes included 7-, 14-, 21-, and 28-day mortality rates, microbiological cure rates, and length of hospital stay. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ceftazidime-avibactam group showed significantly lower 7-day mortality (8.51 % vs. 25.93 %, p = 0.043) and higher survival rates in Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = 0.021). Multivariate analysis revealed that ceftazidime-avibactam significantly reduced 7-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.182, 95 % CI: 0.050–0.660, p = 0.010). Leukemia significantly increased both 7-day and all-cause mortality. Elevated white blood cell counts, and C-reactive protein levels were associated with increased mortality risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrated superior short-term survival benefits compared to carbapenem-based regimens in treating nosocomial CRKP BSI. However, long-term outcomes were more influenced by underlying conditions and inflammatory status.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56117,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","volume":"58 5","pages":"Pages 579-584"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness comparison between ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenem-based regimens in nosocomial carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections\",\"authors\":\"Ruei-Chang Huang ,&nbsp;Li-Ying Chen ,&nbsp;Ying-Chuan Wang ,&nbsp;Chun-Hsiang Chiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmii.2025.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Carbapenem-resistant <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em> bloodstream infections (CRKP BSI) are associated with high mortality rates and limited treatment options. This study compared the outcomes between ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenem-based regimens in patients with nosocomial CRKP BSI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a single-center, retrospective, observational study that analyzed adult patients with nosocomial CRKP BSI from January 2018 to December 2023. Patients were divided into ceftazidime-avibactam (n = 47) and carbapenem-based regimen (n = 54) groups. Primary outcomes included 7-, 14-, 21-, and 28-day mortality rates, microbiological cure rates, and length of hospital stay. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ceftazidime-avibactam group showed significantly lower 7-day mortality (8.51 % vs. 25.93 %, p = 0.043) and higher survival rates in Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = 0.021). Multivariate analysis revealed that ceftazidime-avibactam significantly reduced 7-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.182, 95 % CI: 0.050–0.660, p = 0.010). Leukemia significantly increased both 7-day and all-cause mortality. Elevated white blood cell counts, and C-reactive protein levels were associated with increased mortality risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrated superior short-term survival benefits compared to carbapenem-based regimens in treating nosocomial CRKP BSI. However, long-term outcomes were more influenced by underlying conditions and inflammatory status.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection\",\"volume\":\"58 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 579-584\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118225000635\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118225000635","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:碳青霉烯耐药肺炎克雷伯菌血流感染(CRKP BSI)与高死亡率和有限的治疗方案相关。本研究比较了头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和以碳青霉烯为基础的方案治疗院内CRKP BSI患者的结果。方法:这是一项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究,分析了2018年1月至2023年12月成人院内CRKP BSI患者。患者分为头孢他啶-阿维巴坦组(n = 47)和碳青霉烯组(n = 54)。主要结局包括7天、14天、21天和28天的死亡率、微生物治愈率和住院时间。进行多变量分析以确定与死亡率相关的因素。结果:经Kaplan-Meier分析,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦组7天死亡率(8.51% vs. 25.93%, p = 0.043)显著降低,生存率显著提高(p = 0.021)。多因素分析显示头孢他啶-阿维巴坦显著降低7天死亡率(校正风险比:0.182,95% CI: 0.050-0.660, p = 0.010)。白血病显著增加了7天死亡率和全因死亡率。白细胞计数和c反应蛋白水平升高与死亡风险增加有关。结论:与以碳青霉烯为基础的方案相比,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦在治疗医院性CRKP BSI方面具有更优越的短期生存益处。然而,长期结果更多地受到基础条件和炎症状态的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness comparison between ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenem-based regimens in nosocomial carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections

Background

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections (CRKP BSI) are associated with high mortality rates and limited treatment options. This study compared the outcomes between ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenem-based regimens in patients with nosocomial CRKP BSI.

Methods

This is a single-center, retrospective, observational study that analyzed adult patients with nosocomial CRKP BSI from January 2018 to December 2023. Patients were divided into ceftazidime-avibactam (n = 47) and carbapenem-based regimen (n = 54) groups. Primary outcomes included 7-, 14-, 21-, and 28-day mortality rates, microbiological cure rates, and length of hospital stay. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with mortality.

Results

The ceftazidime-avibactam group showed significantly lower 7-day mortality (8.51 % vs. 25.93 %, p = 0.043) and higher survival rates in Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = 0.021). Multivariate analysis revealed that ceftazidime-avibactam significantly reduced 7-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.182, 95 % CI: 0.050–0.660, p = 0.010). Leukemia significantly increased both 7-day and all-cause mortality. Elevated white blood cell counts, and C-reactive protein levels were associated with increased mortality risk.

Conclusion

Ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrated superior short-term survival benefits compared to carbapenem-based regimens in treating nosocomial CRKP BSI. However, long-term outcomes were more influenced by underlying conditions and inflammatory status.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
5.40%
发文量
159
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection is an open access journal, committed to disseminating information on the latest trends and advances in microbiology, immunology, infectious diseases and parasitology. Article types considered include perspectives, review articles, original articles, brief reports and correspondence. With the aim of promoting effective and accurate scientific information, an expert panel of referees constitutes the backbone of the peer-review process in evaluating the quality and content of manuscripts submitted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信