测试失败、疲劳与心理功能的关系

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Greta N Minor, Olivia R Kessler, Laura Fry, Brooke Huizenga, Sara Johnson, Savana M Naini, Chen Shen, Sophie J Wiitala, Michael R Basso, Courtney L Eskridge, Erin Holker, Allison M Logemann, Eric J Waldron, Douglas M Whiteside
{"title":"测试失败、疲劳与心理功能的关系","authors":"Greta N Minor, Olivia R Kessler, Laura Fry, Brooke Huizenga, Sara Johnson, Savana M Naini, Chen Shen, Sophie J Wiitala, Michael R Basso, Courtney L Eskridge, Erin Holker, Allison M Logemann, Eric J Waldron, Douglas M Whiteside","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2025.2476798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> At times, patients with Long COVID fail performance validity tests (PVTs) for cognitive measures and symptom validity tests (SVTs) embedded in formal personality measures. This is the first study, to our knowledge, to examine whether self-reported symptoms on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) were related to performance validity in Long COVID patients. <b>Method:</b> Participants were 175 individuals diagnosed with Long COVID who completed four PVTs, the MFIS, and the PAI. There was evidence for nots based on medical records review for 25.71% of the patients. Based on PVT performances, patients were assigned to one of three groups: Pass group (no PVT failures), Intermediate group (1 PVT failure), or Fail group (2+ PVT failures). <b>Results:</b> 84.57% of participants were in the Pass group, 9.14% in the Intermediate group, and 6.29% in the Fail group. There was a not a significant difference in external incentive frequency between groups. Only one significant group difference on the PAI scales and subscales was found, with slightly greater somatization symptoms (SOM-S) reported in the Fail group relative to the Pass group (<i>η<sup>2</sup></i> = .03). The MFIS was not significantly different between groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that PVT failure is not associated with fatigue or PAI responses, except on the somatization subscale.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between performance validity Test failure, fatigue, and psychological functioning in Long COVID.\",\"authors\":\"Greta N Minor, Olivia R Kessler, Laura Fry, Brooke Huizenga, Sara Johnson, Savana M Naini, Chen Shen, Sophie J Wiitala, Michael R Basso, Courtney L Eskridge, Erin Holker, Allison M Logemann, Eric J Waldron, Douglas M Whiteside\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13854046.2025.2476798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> At times, patients with Long COVID fail performance validity tests (PVTs) for cognitive measures and symptom validity tests (SVTs) embedded in formal personality measures. This is the first study, to our knowledge, to examine whether self-reported symptoms on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) were related to performance validity in Long COVID patients. <b>Method:</b> Participants were 175 individuals diagnosed with Long COVID who completed four PVTs, the MFIS, and the PAI. There was evidence for nots based on medical records review for 25.71% of the patients. Based on PVT performances, patients were assigned to one of three groups: Pass group (no PVT failures), Intermediate group (1 PVT failure), or Fail group (2+ PVT failures). <b>Results:</b> 84.57% of participants were in the Pass group, 9.14% in the Intermediate group, and 6.29% in the Fail group. There was a not a significant difference in external incentive frequency between groups. Only one significant group difference on the PAI scales and subscales was found, with slightly greater somatization symptoms (SOM-S) reported in the Fail group relative to the Pass group (<i>η<sup>2</sup></i> = .03). The MFIS was not significantly different between groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that PVT failure is not associated with fatigue or PAI responses, except on the somatization subscale.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2476798\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2476798","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:长冠肺炎患者有时无法通过正式人格测试中嵌入的认知测试和症状效度测试。据我们所知,这是第一次研究长冠患者在人格评估量表(PAI)和修正疲劳影响量表(MFIS)中自我报告的症状是否与表现效度相关。方法:研究对象为175例长冠肺炎确诊患者,他们完成了4次pvt、MFIS和PAI。25.71%的患者的医疗记录有证据表明不存在。根据PVT表现,将患者分为三组:通过组(无PVT失败),中间组(1 PVT失败)或失败组(2+ PVT失败)。结果:合格组占84.57%,中级组占9.14%,不及格组占6.29%。两组之间的外部激励频率差异不显著。在PAI量表和亚量表上仅发现一个显著组间差异,失败组报告的躯体化症状(SOM-S)略高于通过组(η2 = 0.03)。MFIS组间差异无统计学意义。结论:这些发现表明PVT衰竭与疲劳或PAI反应无关,除了躯体化亚量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The relationship between performance validity Test failure, fatigue, and psychological functioning in Long COVID.

Objective: At times, patients with Long COVID fail performance validity tests (PVTs) for cognitive measures and symptom validity tests (SVTs) embedded in formal personality measures. This is the first study, to our knowledge, to examine whether self-reported symptoms on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) were related to performance validity in Long COVID patients. Method: Participants were 175 individuals diagnosed with Long COVID who completed four PVTs, the MFIS, and the PAI. There was evidence for nots based on medical records review for 25.71% of the patients. Based on PVT performances, patients were assigned to one of three groups: Pass group (no PVT failures), Intermediate group (1 PVT failure), or Fail group (2+ PVT failures). Results: 84.57% of participants were in the Pass group, 9.14% in the Intermediate group, and 6.29% in the Fail group. There was a not a significant difference in external incentive frequency between groups. Only one significant group difference on the PAI scales and subscales was found, with slightly greater somatization symptoms (SOM-S) reported in the Fail group relative to the Pass group (η2 = .03). The MFIS was not significantly different between groups. Conclusions: These findings suggest that PVT failure is not associated with fatigue or PAI responses, except on the somatization subscale.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信