检测慢性疼痛和纤维肌痛的模拟症状:意大利版自我报告症状清单的两项研究评估。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Raffaella Maria Ribatti, Thomas Merten, Tiziana Lanciano, Antonietta Curci
{"title":"检测慢性疼痛和纤维肌痛的模拟症状:意大利版自我报告症状清单的两项研究评估。","authors":"Raffaella Maria Ribatti, Thomas Merten, Tiziana Lanciano, Antonietta Curci","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2475951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The subjective nature of pain complicates objective verification, often leading to noncredible symptom reports in compensable settings. Across two studies, we evaluated the Italian Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SRSI-It) in distinguishing healthy individuals, simulators, and fibromyalgia patients. In Study 1, we assigned 958 participants to the honest (<i>n</i> = 482) or simulator group (<i>n</i> = 476). Simulators reported higher scores on genuine and pseudosymptoms. A cut score > 6 showed 92% specificity and 64% sensitivity; > 9 raised specificity to 95%. The SRSI-It identified 62% and 58% of simulators at > 6 and > 9, respectively, compared to 76% identified by the SIMS. In Study 2, we recruited 100 patients and paired each with a healthy control and a fibromyalgia simulator (<i>N</i> = 300). Simulators scored highest on pseudosymptoms, while patients scored higher than controls. The SRSI-It identified 73% and 61% of simulators at cut scores of > 6 and > 9, compared to 51% and 34% of patients and 15% and 13% of controls. The SRSI-It demonstrated sensitivity to simulated pain, suggesting its utility in distinguishing simulators from honest respondents in clinical and forensic settings. However, caution is warranted to avoid misclassifying genuine patients, highlighting the need for complementary tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting simulated symptoms in chronic pain and fibromyalgia: A two-study evaluation of the Italian version of the Self-Report Symptom Inventory.\",\"authors\":\"Raffaella Maria Ribatti, Thomas Merten, Tiziana Lanciano, Antonietta Curci\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2025.2475951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The subjective nature of pain complicates objective verification, often leading to noncredible symptom reports in compensable settings. Across two studies, we evaluated the Italian Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SRSI-It) in distinguishing healthy individuals, simulators, and fibromyalgia patients. In Study 1, we assigned 958 participants to the honest (<i>n</i> = 482) or simulator group (<i>n</i> = 476). Simulators reported higher scores on genuine and pseudosymptoms. A cut score > 6 showed 92% specificity and 64% sensitivity; > 9 raised specificity to 95%. The SRSI-It identified 62% and 58% of simulators at > 6 and > 9, respectively, compared to 76% identified by the SIMS. In Study 2, we recruited 100 patients and paired each with a healthy control and a fibromyalgia simulator (<i>N</i> = 300). Simulators scored highest on pseudosymptoms, while patients scored higher than controls. The SRSI-It identified 73% and 61% of simulators at cut scores of > 6 and > 9, compared to 51% and 34% of patients and 15% and 13% of controls. The SRSI-It demonstrated sensitivity to simulated pain, suggesting its utility in distinguishing simulators from honest respondents in clinical and forensic settings. However, caution is warranted to avoid misclassifying genuine patients, highlighting the need for complementary tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2475951\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2475951","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疼痛的主观性质使客观验证复杂化,常常导致在可补偿设置中不可信的症状报告。在两项研究中,我们评估了意大利自我报告症状清单(SRSI-It)在区分健康个体、模拟者和纤维肌痛患者中的作用。在研究1中,我们将958名参与者分配到诚实组(n = 482)或模拟组(n = 476)。模拟者在真实症状和虚假症状上的得分更高。切口评分>.6的特异性为92%,敏感性为64%;>9将特异性提高到95%。SRSI-It在bbb6和bbb9分别识别了62%和58%的模拟器,而SIMS识别了76%。在研究2中,我们招募了100名患者,并将每个患者与健康对照和纤维肌痛模拟器配对(N = 300)。模拟者在假症状上得分最高,而患者得分高于对照组。SRSI-It识别出73%和61%的模拟者在bbbb6和bbbb9分,相比之下,患者为51%和34%,对照组为15%和13%。SRSI-It显示了对模拟疼痛的敏感性,这表明它在临床和法医环境中区分模拟者和诚实应答者的效用。然而,谨慎是必要的,以避免误分类真正的病人,强调需要补充工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detecting simulated symptoms in chronic pain and fibromyalgia: A two-study evaluation of the Italian version of the Self-Report Symptom Inventory.

The subjective nature of pain complicates objective verification, often leading to noncredible symptom reports in compensable settings. Across two studies, we evaluated the Italian Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SRSI-It) in distinguishing healthy individuals, simulators, and fibromyalgia patients. In Study 1, we assigned 958 participants to the honest (n = 482) or simulator group (n = 476). Simulators reported higher scores on genuine and pseudosymptoms. A cut score > 6 showed 92% specificity and 64% sensitivity; > 9 raised specificity to 95%. The SRSI-It identified 62% and 58% of simulators at > 6 and > 9, respectively, compared to 76% identified by the SIMS. In Study 2, we recruited 100 patients and paired each with a healthy control and a fibromyalgia simulator (N = 300). Simulators scored highest on pseudosymptoms, while patients scored higher than controls. The SRSI-It identified 73% and 61% of simulators at cut scores of > 6 and > 9, compared to 51% and 34% of patients and 15% and 13% of controls. The SRSI-It demonstrated sensitivity to simulated pain, suggesting its utility in distinguishing simulators from honest respondents in clinical and forensic settings. However, caution is warranted to avoid misclassifying genuine patients, highlighting the need for complementary tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信