但它闻起来怎么样?现存和化石灵长类动物及其他原始灵长类动物嗅球大小的研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Madlen Maryanna Lang, Mary Teresa Silcox, Łucja Fostowicz-Frelik, Adam Lis, Sergi López-Torres, Gabriela San Martin-Flores, Ornella C Bertrand
{"title":"但它闻起来怎么样?现存和化石灵长类动物及其他原始灵长类动物嗅球大小的研究。","authors":"Madlen Maryanna Lang, Mary Teresa Silcox, Łucja Fostowicz-Frelik, Adam Lis, Sergi López-Torres, Gabriela San Martin-Flores, Ornella C Bertrand","doi":"10.1002/ar.25651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Primates are often considered to have a poor sense of smell. While all studies identify small olfactory bulbs (OB; the region of the brain responsible for processing scent) among haplorhines, whether or not strepsirrhines also possess small OBs is less clear, as is the evolutionary backdrop from which these patterns emerged. Here, we examine the relative size of the olfactory bulbs in cranial endocasts of living and fossil primates and their kin (Euarchontoglires [Primates, Dermoptera, Scandentia, Rodentia, Lagomorpha]), testing previous hypotheses. Regression analyses of OB volume and mass relative to endocranial volume (ECV) and body mass (BM), and ANOVAS of residuals, were performed on a dataset of 181 extant and 41 extinct species. Analyses show clear differences in the relative size of the OBs, with haplorhines possessing distinctly smaller OBs relative to all other clades. Pairwise tests indicate haplorhine OBs are significantly smaller than those of all other clades, including strepsirrhines; when the haplorhines are removed from analyses, strepsirrhines are significantly smaller than all other clades. This suggests that a reduction in OB size occurred at the crown primate node, a pattern also seen in ancestral state reconstruction (ASR) analyses. The ASR analyses suggest multiple iterations of olfactory bulb size decrease occurred in Haplorhini, reflecting large amounts of parallelism. These results likely differ from previous studies due to the inclusion of additional fossils and more appropriate outgroups based on up-to-date phylogenetic hypotheses.</p>","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"But how does it smell? An investigation of olfactory bulb size among living and fossil primates and other euarchontoglirans.\",\"authors\":\"Madlen Maryanna Lang, Mary Teresa Silcox, Łucja Fostowicz-Frelik, Adam Lis, Sergi López-Torres, Gabriela San Martin-Flores, Ornella C Bertrand\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ar.25651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Primates are often considered to have a poor sense of smell. While all studies identify small olfactory bulbs (OB; the region of the brain responsible for processing scent) among haplorhines, whether or not strepsirrhines also possess small OBs is less clear, as is the evolutionary backdrop from which these patterns emerged. Here, we examine the relative size of the olfactory bulbs in cranial endocasts of living and fossil primates and their kin (Euarchontoglires [Primates, Dermoptera, Scandentia, Rodentia, Lagomorpha]), testing previous hypotheses. Regression analyses of OB volume and mass relative to endocranial volume (ECV) and body mass (BM), and ANOVAS of residuals, were performed on a dataset of 181 extant and 41 extinct species. Analyses show clear differences in the relative size of the OBs, with haplorhines possessing distinctly smaller OBs relative to all other clades. Pairwise tests indicate haplorhine OBs are significantly smaller than those of all other clades, including strepsirrhines; when the haplorhines are removed from analyses, strepsirrhines are significantly smaller than all other clades. This suggests that a reduction in OB size occurred at the crown primate node, a pattern also seen in ancestral state reconstruction (ASR) analyses. The ASR analyses suggest multiple iterations of olfactory bulb size decrease occurred in Haplorhini, reflecting large amounts of parallelism. These results likely differ from previous studies due to the inclusion of additional fossils and more appropriate outgroups based on up-to-date phylogenetic hypotheses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.25651\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.25651","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

灵长类动物通常被认为嗅觉很差。虽然所有的研究都发现了小嗅球(OB;(大脑中负责处理气味的区域),链霉菌是否也有小OBs尚不清楚,这些模式出现的进化背景也不清楚。在这里,我们检查了活体和化石灵长类动物及其近亲(灵长类,皮翅目,Scandentia,啮齿类,Lagomorpha)颅骨内模中嗅球的相对大小,以验证先前的假设。对181个现存物种和41个灭绝物种的数据集进行了OB体积和质量与颅内体积(ECV)和体重(BM)的回归分析,并对残差进行了方差分析。分析结果显示,在OBs的相对大小上存在明显的差异,单长龙的OBs明显小于其他所有进化支。两两检验表明,单普罗因的OBs显著小于所有其他进化枝,包括链霉菌;当从分析中除去单链虫时,链虫比所有其他进化枝都要小得多。这表明OB大小的减少发生在灵长类动物的冠结,这种模式也出现在祖先状态重建(ASR)分析中。ASR分析表明,Haplorhini的嗅球大小减少发生了多次迭代,反映了大量的并行性。这些结果可能与以前的研究不同,因为包含了额外的化石和基于最新系统发育假设的更合适的外群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
But how does it smell? An investigation of olfactory bulb size among living and fossil primates and other euarchontoglirans.

Primates are often considered to have a poor sense of smell. While all studies identify small olfactory bulbs (OB; the region of the brain responsible for processing scent) among haplorhines, whether or not strepsirrhines also possess small OBs is less clear, as is the evolutionary backdrop from which these patterns emerged. Here, we examine the relative size of the olfactory bulbs in cranial endocasts of living and fossil primates and their kin (Euarchontoglires [Primates, Dermoptera, Scandentia, Rodentia, Lagomorpha]), testing previous hypotheses. Regression analyses of OB volume and mass relative to endocranial volume (ECV) and body mass (BM), and ANOVAS of residuals, were performed on a dataset of 181 extant and 41 extinct species. Analyses show clear differences in the relative size of the OBs, with haplorhines possessing distinctly smaller OBs relative to all other clades. Pairwise tests indicate haplorhine OBs are significantly smaller than those of all other clades, including strepsirrhines; when the haplorhines are removed from analyses, strepsirrhines are significantly smaller than all other clades. This suggests that a reduction in OB size occurred at the crown primate node, a pattern also seen in ancestral state reconstruction (ASR) analyses. The ASR analyses suggest multiple iterations of olfactory bulb size decrease occurred in Haplorhini, reflecting large amounts of parallelism. These results likely differ from previous studies due to the inclusion of additional fossils and more appropriate outgroups based on up-to-date phylogenetic hypotheses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
15.00%
发文量
266
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Anatomical Record
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信