女性卫生保健专业人员的握力和耐力。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ERGONOMICS
Trajkov Marija, Milošević Miloš, Kukić Filip, Šimpraga Ljiljana, Dopsaj Milivoj, Ćuk Ivan
{"title":"女性卫生保健专业人员的握力和耐力。","authors":"Trajkov Marija, Milošević Miloš, Kukić Filip, Šimpraga Ljiljana, Dopsaj Milivoj, Ćuk Ivan","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2025.2470010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives</i>. The first aim of this study was to examine the differences between dominant and non-dominant hand and finger muscle contractile abilities. The secondary aim was to assess the relationship between variables used in assessing healthcare workers' hand and finger muscle contractile abilities. <i>Methods</i>. The study included 129 healthcare women who performed handgrip strength and endurance tests. Quantitative data on the maximum force, time to maximum force, time to maximum rate of force development, the rate of force development and the time of endurance in force, expressed as the force impulse, were measured. <i>Results</i>. The <i>t</i> test for paired samples showed significant differences between dominant and non-dominant hands in maximum force and rate of force development. The factorial analysis revealed three main components. Contractile force included maximum force and rate of force development, neural speed included time to maximum force and time to rate of force development, while neuro-muscular endurance included endurance of the non-dominant and dominant hands. <i>Conclusion</i>. The results of this research show that it is essential to continue to assess variables from all three components of the resulting model in future research and clinical practice, regardless of the hand tested.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Handgrip strength and endurance in female healthcare professional workers.\",\"authors\":\"Trajkov Marija, Milošević Miloš, Kukić Filip, Šimpraga Ljiljana, Dopsaj Milivoj, Ćuk Ivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10803548.2025.2470010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objectives</i>. The first aim of this study was to examine the differences between dominant and non-dominant hand and finger muscle contractile abilities. The secondary aim was to assess the relationship between variables used in assessing healthcare workers' hand and finger muscle contractile abilities. <i>Methods</i>. The study included 129 healthcare women who performed handgrip strength and endurance tests. Quantitative data on the maximum force, time to maximum force, time to maximum rate of force development, the rate of force development and the time of endurance in force, expressed as the force impulse, were measured. <i>Results</i>. The <i>t</i> test for paired samples showed significant differences between dominant and non-dominant hands in maximum force and rate of force development. The factorial analysis revealed three main components. Contractile force included maximum force and rate of force development, neural speed included time to maximum force and time to rate of force development, while neuro-muscular endurance included endurance of the non-dominant and dominant hands. <i>Conclusion</i>. The results of this research show that it is essential to continue to assess variables from all three components of the resulting model in future research and clinical practice, regardless of the hand tested.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2025.2470010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2025.2470010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标。本研究的第一个目的是检查优势和非优势手和手指肌肉收缩能力之间的差异。第二个目的是评估用于评估医护人员的手和手指肌肉收缩能力的变量之间的关系。方法。这项研究包括129名医疗保健女性,她们进行了握力和耐力测试。测量了最大力、到最大力的时间、到最大力的时间、力的发展速度、力的发展速度和力的持久时间的定量数据,以力的冲量表示。结果。配对样本的t检验显示优势手和非优势手在最大力和力发展速度上存在显著差异。析因分析揭示了三个主要成分。收缩力包括最大力和力发展速度,神经速度包括到最大力的时间和到力发展速度的时间,而神经肌肉耐力包括非优势手和优势手的耐力。结论。这项研究的结果表明,在未来的研究和临床实践中,无论手工测试如何,都必须继续评估结果模型的所有三个组成部分的变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Handgrip strength and endurance in female healthcare professional workers.

Objectives. The first aim of this study was to examine the differences between dominant and non-dominant hand and finger muscle contractile abilities. The secondary aim was to assess the relationship between variables used in assessing healthcare workers' hand and finger muscle contractile abilities. Methods. The study included 129 healthcare women who performed handgrip strength and endurance tests. Quantitative data on the maximum force, time to maximum force, time to maximum rate of force development, the rate of force development and the time of endurance in force, expressed as the force impulse, were measured. Results. The t test for paired samples showed significant differences between dominant and non-dominant hands in maximum force and rate of force development. The factorial analysis revealed three main components. Contractile force included maximum force and rate of force development, neural speed included time to maximum force and time to rate of force development, while neuro-muscular endurance included endurance of the non-dominant and dominant hands. Conclusion. The results of this research show that it is essential to continue to assess variables from all three components of the resulting model in future research and clinical practice, regardless of the hand tested.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信