胰腺内镜超声引导下细针穿刺的细胞学诊断价值:普通上皮性胰胆道肿瘤的准确性和细胞阻滞分析的作用。

Q3 Medicine
Iranian Journal of Pathology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.30699/ijp.2024.2036290.3329
Naser Rakhshani, Neda Soleimani, Sanaz Aghaei, Rasha Barakat, Ali Mohammad Keshtvarz Hesam Abadi
{"title":"胰腺内镜超声引导下细针穿刺的细胞学诊断价值:普通上皮性胰胆道肿瘤的准确性和细胞阻滞分析的作用。","authors":"Naser Rakhshani, Neda Soleimani, Sanaz Aghaei, Rasha Barakat, Ali Mohammad Keshtvarz Hesam Abadi","doi":"10.30699/ijp.2024.2036290.3329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & objective: </strong>Limited literature describes the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology in various types of pancreatic epithelial tumors, and this underscores the usefulness of cell blocks, and highlights potential diagnostic pitfalls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 108 patients who underwent EUS-FNA pancreatobiliary cytology followed by surgery. Age, gender, tumor location, tumor size, presence or absence of a cell block, cytologic and pathologic diagnoses, and histologic tumor grade were recorded. Cytologic and pathologic slides were examined, and the cytologic accuracy was determined by comparing cytologic with the histopathologic results as the gold standard. Additionally, the impact of cell block on the cytologic accuracy was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EUS-FNA cytology showed an overall accuracy of 80%, a sensitivity of 90%, and a false-positive rate below 1%. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAs) accounted for 65% of cases, followed by neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs), mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs), and chronic pancreatitis. Diagnostic accuracy was higher for PDA and SPN than for NET and MCN and significantly improved to 100% in cases with a cell block.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining pancreatobiliary cytology with a cell block significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy, reaching 100%. Moreover, poorly differentiated PDAs and well-differentiated organoid-type tumors, such as NETs and SPNs, demonstrate higher diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":38900,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Pathology","volume":"20 1","pages":"98-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Value of Cytology in Pancreatic Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: Accuracy in Common Epithelial Pancreatobiliary Tumors and the Role of Cell Block Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Naser Rakhshani, Neda Soleimani, Sanaz Aghaei, Rasha Barakat, Ali Mohammad Keshtvarz Hesam Abadi\",\"doi\":\"10.30699/ijp.2024.2036290.3329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & objective: </strong>Limited literature describes the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology in various types of pancreatic epithelial tumors, and this underscores the usefulness of cell blocks, and highlights potential diagnostic pitfalls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 108 patients who underwent EUS-FNA pancreatobiliary cytology followed by surgery. Age, gender, tumor location, tumor size, presence or absence of a cell block, cytologic and pathologic diagnoses, and histologic tumor grade were recorded. Cytologic and pathologic slides were examined, and the cytologic accuracy was determined by comparing cytologic with the histopathologic results as the gold standard. Additionally, the impact of cell block on the cytologic accuracy was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EUS-FNA cytology showed an overall accuracy of 80%, a sensitivity of 90%, and a false-positive rate below 1%. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAs) accounted for 65% of cases, followed by neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs), mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs), and chronic pancreatitis. Diagnostic accuracy was higher for PDA and SPN than for NET and MCN and significantly improved to 100% in cases with a cell block.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining pancreatobiliary cytology with a cell block significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy, reaching 100%. Moreover, poorly differentiated PDAs and well-differentiated organoid-type tumors, such as NETs and SPNs, demonstrate higher diagnostic accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Pathology\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"98-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887639/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30699/ijp.2024.2036290.3329\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30699/ijp.2024.2036290.3329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:有限的文献描述了内镜超声细针穿刺(EUS-FNA)细胞学在各种类型胰腺上皮肿瘤中的准确性,这强调了细胞阻滞的有用性,并强调了潜在的诊断缺陷。方法:108例手术后行EUS-FNA胰胆细胞学检查的患者。记录年龄、性别、肿瘤位置、肿瘤大小、是否存在细胞阻滞、细胞学和病理学诊断以及组织学肿瘤分级。检查细胞学和病理学切片,通过比较细胞学和组织病理学结果作为金标准来确定细胞学的准确性。此外,还评估了细胞阻滞对细胞学准确性的影响。结果:EUS-FNA细胞学检查的总体准确率为80%,灵敏度为90%,假阳性率低于1%。胰腺导管腺癌(pda)占65%,其次是神经内分泌肿瘤(NETs)、实性假乳头状瘤(spn)、粘液囊性肿瘤(mcn)和慢性胰腺炎。PDA和SPN的诊断准确性高于NET和MCN,并且在细胞阻滞的情况下显着提高到100%。结论:胰胆细胞学联合细胞阻滞可显著提高诊断准确率,达到100%。此外,低分化的pda和高分化的类器官型肿瘤,如NETs和spn,具有更高的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Value of Cytology in Pancreatic Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: Accuracy in Common Epithelial Pancreatobiliary Tumors and the Role of Cell Block Analysis.

Background & objective: Limited literature describes the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology in various types of pancreatic epithelial tumors, and this underscores the usefulness of cell blocks, and highlights potential diagnostic pitfalls.

Methods: This study included 108 patients who underwent EUS-FNA pancreatobiliary cytology followed by surgery. Age, gender, tumor location, tumor size, presence or absence of a cell block, cytologic and pathologic diagnoses, and histologic tumor grade were recorded. Cytologic and pathologic slides were examined, and the cytologic accuracy was determined by comparing cytologic with the histopathologic results as the gold standard. Additionally, the impact of cell block on the cytologic accuracy was assessed.

Results: EUS-FNA cytology showed an overall accuracy of 80%, a sensitivity of 90%, and a false-positive rate below 1%. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAs) accounted for 65% of cases, followed by neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs), mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs), and chronic pancreatitis. Diagnostic accuracy was higher for PDA and SPN than for NET and MCN and significantly improved to 100% in cases with a cell block.

Conclusion: Combining pancreatobiliary cytology with a cell block significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy, reaching 100%. Moreover, poorly differentiated PDAs and well-differentiated organoid-type tumors, such as NETs and SPNs, demonstrate higher diagnostic accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Pathology
Iranian Journal of Pathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信