腹部CT机会性筛查显示,肌间脂肪组织对肌肉密度的影响大于肌内脂肪组织含量。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Xinyi Guo, Nana Cao, Xin Deng, Nan Wang, Rui Li, Song Ren, Fei Fu, Liqing Kang, Zhen He
{"title":"腹部CT机会性筛查显示,肌间脂肪组织对肌肉密度的影响大于肌内脂肪组织含量。","authors":"Xinyi Guo, Nana Cao, Xin Deng, Nan Wang, Rui Li, Song Ren, Fei Fu, Liqing Kang, Zhen He","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-85946-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to determine whether intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) or intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC) has a greater effect on skeletal muscle density (SMD) and to explore the underlying mechanisms. We recruited 292 inpatients without musculoskeletal system disease, all of whom underwent abdominal CT. Muscle parameters, including skeletal muscle area (SMA), skeletal muscle index (SMI), SMD, IMAC, and IMAT, as well as fat parameters-subcutaneous fat area (SFA) and subcutaneous fat density (SFD) in the abdominal wall-were measured by two musculoskeletal radiologists using ImageJ software at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) level. One-way ANOVA with LSD (chi-square test for group comparisons where p > 0.05) or Dunnett's T3 test (p < 0.05) was employed to compare muscle parameters between genders and across age groups. The relationship between SMD and muscle measurements was analyzed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Multiple regression analysis identified and compared factors influencing SMD. SMD was highly correlated with IMAT and IMAC (p < 0.05), moderately correlated with gender, age, and SFA (p < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that IMAC, IMAT, and age significantly affected SMD (p < 0.05), with the order of influence being IMAT (β = -0.616), IMAC (β = -0.429), and age (β = -0.098). SFA and gender did not significantly affect SMD (p > 0.05). The findings revealed that age, IMAT, and IMAC influence SMD, with IMAT exerting the most significant impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"8172"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11891326/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intermuscular adipose tissue affected muscle density more than intramuscular adipose tissue content with opportunistic screening at abdominal CT.\",\"authors\":\"Xinyi Guo, Nana Cao, Xin Deng, Nan Wang, Rui Li, Song Ren, Fei Fu, Liqing Kang, Zhen He\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-85946-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to determine whether intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) or intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC) has a greater effect on skeletal muscle density (SMD) and to explore the underlying mechanisms. We recruited 292 inpatients without musculoskeletal system disease, all of whom underwent abdominal CT. Muscle parameters, including skeletal muscle area (SMA), skeletal muscle index (SMI), SMD, IMAC, and IMAT, as well as fat parameters-subcutaneous fat area (SFA) and subcutaneous fat density (SFD) in the abdominal wall-were measured by two musculoskeletal radiologists using ImageJ software at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) level. One-way ANOVA with LSD (chi-square test for group comparisons where p > 0.05) or Dunnett's T3 test (p < 0.05) was employed to compare muscle parameters between genders and across age groups. The relationship between SMD and muscle measurements was analyzed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Multiple regression analysis identified and compared factors influencing SMD. SMD was highly correlated with IMAT and IMAC (p < 0.05), moderately correlated with gender, age, and SFA (p < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that IMAC, IMAT, and age significantly affected SMD (p < 0.05), with the order of influence being IMAT (β = -0.616), IMAC (β = -0.429), and age (β = -0.098). SFA and gender did not significantly affect SMD (p > 0.05). The findings revealed that age, IMAT, and IMAC influence SMD, with IMAT exerting the most significant impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"8172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11891326/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85946-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85946-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定肌间脂肪组织(IMAT)或肌内脂肪组织含量(IMAC)对骨骼肌密度(SMD)的影响更大,并探讨其潜在机制。我们招募了292名没有肌肉骨骼系统疾病的住院患者,他们都接受了腹部CT检查。肌肉参数包括骨骼肌面积(SMA)、骨骼肌指数(SMI)、SMD、IMAC和IMAT,以及脂肪参数-腹壁皮下脂肪面积(SFA)和皮下脂肪密度(SFD)由两名肌肉骨骼放射科医生在第三腰椎(L3)水平使用ImageJ软件测量。单因素方差分析采用LSD(组间比较采用卡方检验,p < 0.05)或Dunnett's T3检验(p < 0.05)。研究结果显示,年龄、IMAT和IMAC影响SMD,其中IMAT的影响最为显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Intermuscular adipose tissue affected muscle density more than intramuscular adipose tissue content with opportunistic screening at abdominal CT.

Intermuscular adipose tissue affected muscle density more than intramuscular adipose tissue content with opportunistic screening at abdominal CT.

Intermuscular adipose tissue affected muscle density more than intramuscular adipose tissue content with opportunistic screening at abdominal CT.

Intermuscular adipose tissue affected muscle density more than intramuscular adipose tissue content with opportunistic screening at abdominal CT.

This study aimed to determine whether intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) or intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC) has a greater effect on skeletal muscle density (SMD) and to explore the underlying mechanisms. We recruited 292 inpatients without musculoskeletal system disease, all of whom underwent abdominal CT. Muscle parameters, including skeletal muscle area (SMA), skeletal muscle index (SMI), SMD, IMAC, and IMAT, as well as fat parameters-subcutaneous fat area (SFA) and subcutaneous fat density (SFD) in the abdominal wall-were measured by two musculoskeletal radiologists using ImageJ software at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) level. One-way ANOVA with LSD (chi-square test for group comparisons where p > 0.05) or Dunnett's T3 test (p < 0.05) was employed to compare muscle parameters between genders and across age groups. The relationship between SMD and muscle measurements was analyzed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Multiple regression analysis identified and compared factors influencing SMD. SMD was highly correlated with IMAT and IMAC (p < 0.05), moderately correlated with gender, age, and SFA (p < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that IMAC, IMAT, and age significantly affected SMD (p < 0.05), with the order of influence being IMAT (β = -0.616), IMAC (β = -0.429), and age (β = -0.098). SFA and gender did not significantly affect SMD (p > 0.05). The findings revealed that age, IMAT, and IMAC influence SMD, with IMAT exerting the most significant impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信