Mohammad Aljaidi, Sunilkumar P Agrawal, Anil Parmar, Pradeep Jangir, Arpita, Bhargavi Indrajit Trivedi, G Gulothungan, Ali Fayez Alkoradees, Reena Jangid, Mohammad Khishe
{"title":"混合黏菌增强收敛粒子群优化算法用于质子交换膜燃料电池参数估计。","authors":"Mohammad Aljaidi, Sunilkumar P Agrawal, Anil Parmar, Pradeep Jangir, Arpita, Bhargavi Indrajit Trivedi, G Gulothungan, Ali Fayez Alkoradees, Reena Jangid, Mohammad Khishe","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-92528-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High efficiency and eco friendliness, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have become a good solution to cleaner energy solutions. However, due to the electrochemical complexity of PEMFCs and the limitations of existing optimization methods, accurately estimating PEMFC parameters to achieve optimal performance is still challenging. In this work, we propose a hybrid optimization algorithm, SCPSO, combining Particle Swarm Optimization with Mixed Mutant Slime Mold to improve precision, consistency, and computational efficiency in PEMFC parameter optimization. Six PEMFC types, BCS 500 W, Nedstack 600 W PS6, SR-12 W, Horizon H-12, Ballard Mark V, and STD 250 W Stack were applied to SCPSO and compared with seven state-of-the-art algorithms, FLA, HFPSO, PSOLC, ESMA, LSMA, DETDO, and EGJO. In all cases, SCPSO consistently outperformed all competitors with the lowest mean sum of squared error (SSE) and minimal standard deviation (e.g., [10<sup>-16</sup>, 10<sup>-18</sup>]), thus confirming its robustness and reliability. Additionally, it demonstrated the lowest number of iterations to reach the optimal solution (less than 200 iterations) and best Friedman Rank (FR = 1), signifying the best optimization to the customer. For instance, in PEMFC1, SCPSO achieved minimal SSE of 0.02549 with negligible variability (Std. = 1.05958E-15) as compared to HFPSO (Std. = 0.001998568) and DETDO (FR = 4). SCPSO's rapid convergence curves, narrow box plot spreads, and precise polarization curves were further validated across all fuel cells. SCPSO was experimentally validated and proved to be reliable with minimal deviations between predicted and experimental voltage and power outputs (e.g., RE = 0.052587% for PEMFC1 and RE = 0.016537% for PEMFC2). The average runtime of SCPSO was 3.05 s, which is faster than alternatives, and still maintains its unparalleled precision. The results of the analyses, fitting the datasets and the convergence curves confirm that the adaptive parameter tuning of SCPSO has significantly improved its performance, resulting in the highest consistency and accuracy with the fastest convergence speed. For PEMFC parameter optimization, results from SCPSO have established it as the algorithm with the strongest precision and stability and fastest computational efficiency. The extension to other energy systems and dynamic real time scenarios will be investigated in future research to enable wider adoption in sustainable energy management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"8083"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A hybrid slime mold enhanced convergent particle swarm optimizer for parameter estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cell.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Aljaidi, Sunilkumar P Agrawal, Anil Parmar, Pradeep Jangir, Arpita, Bhargavi Indrajit Trivedi, G Gulothungan, Ali Fayez Alkoradees, Reena Jangid, Mohammad Khishe\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-92528-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>High efficiency and eco friendliness, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have become a good solution to cleaner energy solutions. However, due to the electrochemical complexity of PEMFCs and the limitations of existing optimization methods, accurately estimating PEMFC parameters to achieve optimal performance is still challenging. In this work, we propose a hybrid optimization algorithm, SCPSO, combining Particle Swarm Optimization with Mixed Mutant Slime Mold to improve precision, consistency, and computational efficiency in PEMFC parameter optimization. Six PEMFC types, BCS 500 W, Nedstack 600 W PS6, SR-12 W, Horizon H-12, Ballard Mark V, and STD 250 W Stack were applied to SCPSO and compared with seven state-of-the-art algorithms, FLA, HFPSO, PSOLC, ESMA, LSMA, DETDO, and EGJO. In all cases, SCPSO consistently outperformed all competitors with the lowest mean sum of squared error (SSE) and minimal standard deviation (e.g., [10<sup>-16</sup>, 10<sup>-18</sup>]), thus confirming its robustness and reliability. Additionally, it demonstrated the lowest number of iterations to reach the optimal solution (less than 200 iterations) and best Friedman Rank (FR = 1), signifying the best optimization to the customer. For instance, in PEMFC1, SCPSO achieved minimal SSE of 0.02549 with negligible variability (Std. = 1.05958E-15) as compared to HFPSO (Std. = 0.001998568) and DETDO (FR = 4). SCPSO's rapid convergence curves, narrow box plot spreads, and precise polarization curves were further validated across all fuel cells. SCPSO was experimentally validated and proved to be reliable with minimal deviations between predicted and experimental voltage and power outputs (e.g., RE = 0.052587% for PEMFC1 and RE = 0.016537% for PEMFC2). The average runtime of SCPSO was 3.05 s, which is faster than alternatives, and still maintains its unparalleled precision. The results of the analyses, fitting the datasets and the convergence curves confirm that the adaptive parameter tuning of SCPSO has significantly improved its performance, resulting in the highest consistency and accuracy with the fastest convergence speed. For PEMFC parameter optimization, results from SCPSO have established it as the algorithm with the strongest precision and stability and fastest computational efficiency. The extension to other energy systems and dynamic real time scenarios will be investigated in future research to enable wider adoption in sustainable energy management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"8083\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890738/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92528-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92528-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A hybrid slime mold enhanced convergent particle swarm optimizer for parameter estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cell.
High efficiency and eco friendliness, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have become a good solution to cleaner energy solutions. However, due to the electrochemical complexity of PEMFCs and the limitations of existing optimization methods, accurately estimating PEMFC parameters to achieve optimal performance is still challenging. In this work, we propose a hybrid optimization algorithm, SCPSO, combining Particle Swarm Optimization with Mixed Mutant Slime Mold to improve precision, consistency, and computational efficiency in PEMFC parameter optimization. Six PEMFC types, BCS 500 W, Nedstack 600 W PS6, SR-12 W, Horizon H-12, Ballard Mark V, and STD 250 W Stack were applied to SCPSO and compared with seven state-of-the-art algorithms, FLA, HFPSO, PSOLC, ESMA, LSMA, DETDO, and EGJO. In all cases, SCPSO consistently outperformed all competitors with the lowest mean sum of squared error (SSE) and minimal standard deviation (e.g., [10-16, 10-18]), thus confirming its robustness and reliability. Additionally, it demonstrated the lowest number of iterations to reach the optimal solution (less than 200 iterations) and best Friedman Rank (FR = 1), signifying the best optimization to the customer. For instance, in PEMFC1, SCPSO achieved minimal SSE of 0.02549 with negligible variability (Std. = 1.05958E-15) as compared to HFPSO (Std. = 0.001998568) and DETDO (FR = 4). SCPSO's rapid convergence curves, narrow box plot spreads, and precise polarization curves were further validated across all fuel cells. SCPSO was experimentally validated and proved to be reliable with minimal deviations between predicted and experimental voltage and power outputs (e.g., RE = 0.052587% for PEMFC1 and RE = 0.016537% for PEMFC2). The average runtime of SCPSO was 3.05 s, which is faster than alternatives, and still maintains its unparalleled precision. The results of the analyses, fitting the datasets and the convergence curves confirm that the adaptive parameter tuning of SCPSO has significantly improved its performance, resulting in the highest consistency and accuracy with the fastest convergence speed. For PEMFC parameter optimization, results from SCPSO have established it as the algorithm with the strongest precision and stability and fastest computational efficiency. The extension to other energy systems and dynamic real time scenarios will be investigated in future research to enable wider adoption in sustainable energy management.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.