混合黏菌增强收敛粒子群优化算法用于质子交换膜燃料电池参数估计。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Mohammad Aljaidi, Sunilkumar P Agrawal, Anil Parmar, Pradeep Jangir, Arpita, Bhargavi Indrajit Trivedi, G Gulothungan, Ali Fayez Alkoradees, Reena Jangid, Mohammad Khishe
{"title":"混合黏菌增强收敛粒子群优化算法用于质子交换膜燃料电池参数估计。","authors":"Mohammad Aljaidi, Sunilkumar P Agrawal, Anil Parmar, Pradeep Jangir, Arpita, Bhargavi Indrajit Trivedi, G Gulothungan, Ali Fayez Alkoradees, Reena Jangid, Mohammad Khishe","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-92528-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High efficiency and eco friendliness, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have become a good solution to cleaner energy solutions. However, due to the electrochemical complexity of PEMFCs and the limitations of existing optimization methods, accurately estimating PEMFC parameters to achieve optimal performance is still challenging. In this work, we propose a hybrid optimization algorithm, SCPSO, combining Particle Swarm Optimization with Mixed Mutant Slime Mold to improve precision, consistency, and computational efficiency in PEMFC parameter optimization. Six PEMFC types, BCS 500 W, Nedstack 600 W PS6, SR-12 W, Horizon H-12, Ballard Mark V, and STD 250 W Stack were applied to SCPSO and compared with seven state-of-the-art algorithms, FLA, HFPSO, PSOLC, ESMA, LSMA, DETDO, and EGJO. In all cases, SCPSO consistently outperformed all competitors with the lowest mean sum of squared error (SSE) and minimal standard deviation (e.g., [10<sup>-16</sup>, 10<sup>-18</sup>]), thus confirming its robustness and reliability. Additionally, it demonstrated the lowest number of iterations to reach the optimal solution (less than 200 iterations) and best Friedman Rank (FR = 1), signifying the best optimization to the customer. For instance, in PEMFC1, SCPSO achieved minimal SSE of 0.02549 with negligible variability (Std. = 1.05958E-15) as compared to HFPSO (Std. = 0.001998568) and DETDO (FR = 4). SCPSO's rapid convergence curves, narrow box plot spreads, and precise polarization curves were further validated across all fuel cells. SCPSO was experimentally validated and proved to be reliable with minimal deviations between predicted and experimental voltage and power outputs (e.g., RE = 0.052587% for PEMFC1 and RE = 0.016537% for PEMFC2). The average runtime of SCPSO was 3.05 s, which is faster than alternatives, and still maintains its unparalleled precision. The results of the analyses, fitting the datasets and the convergence curves confirm that the adaptive parameter tuning of SCPSO has significantly improved its performance, resulting in the highest consistency and accuracy with the fastest convergence speed. For PEMFC parameter optimization, results from SCPSO have established it as the algorithm with the strongest precision and stability and fastest computational efficiency. The extension to other energy systems and dynamic real time scenarios will be investigated in future research to enable wider adoption in sustainable energy management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"8083"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A hybrid slime mold enhanced convergent particle swarm optimizer for parameter estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cell.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Aljaidi, Sunilkumar P Agrawal, Anil Parmar, Pradeep Jangir, Arpita, Bhargavi Indrajit Trivedi, G Gulothungan, Ali Fayez Alkoradees, Reena Jangid, Mohammad Khishe\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-92528-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>High efficiency and eco friendliness, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have become a good solution to cleaner energy solutions. However, due to the electrochemical complexity of PEMFCs and the limitations of existing optimization methods, accurately estimating PEMFC parameters to achieve optimal performance is still challenging. In this work, we propose a hybrid optimization algorithm, SCPSO, combining Particle Swarm Optimization with Mixed Mutant Slime Mold to improve precision, consistency, and computational efficiency in PEMFC parameter optimization. Six PEMFC types, BCS 500 W, Nedstack 600 W PS6, SR-12 W, Horizon H-12, Ballard Mark V, and STD 250 W Stack were applied to SCPSO and compared with seven state-of-the-art algorithms, FLA, HFPSO, PSOLC, ESMA, LSMA, DETDO, and EGJO. In all cases, SCPSO consistently outperformed all competitors with the lowest mean sum of squared error (SSE) and minimal standard deviation (e.g., [10<sup>-16</sup>, 10<sup>-18</sup>]), thus confirming its robustness and reliability. Additionally, it demonstrated the lowest number of iterations to reach the optimal solution (less than 200 iterations) and best Friedman Rank (FR = 1), signifying the best optimization to the customer. For instance, in PEMFC1, SCPSO achieved minimal SSE of 0.02549 with negligible variability (Std. = 1.05958E-15) as compared to HFPSO (Std. = 0.001998568) and DETDO (FR = 4). SCPSO's rapid convergence curves, narrow box plot spreads, and precise polarization curves were further validated across all fuel cells. SCPSO was experimentally validated and proved to be reliable with minimal deviations between predicted and experimental voltage and power outputs (e.g., RE = 0.052587% for PEMFC1 and RE = 0.016537% for PEMFC2). The average runtime of SCPSO was 3.05 s, which is faster than alternatives, and still maintains its unparalleled precision. The results of the analyses, fitting the datasets and the convergence curves confirm that the adaptive parameter tuning of SCPSO has significantly improved its performance, resulting in the highest consistency and accuracy with the fastest convergence speed. For PEMFC parameter optimization, results from SCPSO have established it as the algorithm with the strongest precision and stability and fastest computational efficiency. The extension to other energy systems and dynamic real time scenarios will be investigated in future research to enable wider adoption in sustainable energy management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"8083\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890738/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92528-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92528-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高效、环保的质子交换膜燃料电池(pemfc)已成为清洁能源解决方案的良好解决方案。然而,由于PEMFC的电化学复杂性和现有优化方法的局限性,准确估计PEMFC参数以达到最佳性能仍然是一个挑战。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种混合优化算法,SCPSO,结合粒子群算法和混合突变黏菌优化,以提高PEMFC参数优化的精度、一致性和计算效率。将6种PEMFC类型(BCS 500w、Nedstack 600w、PS6、sr - 12w、Horizon H-12、Ballard Mark V和STD 250w Stack)应用于SCPSO,并比较了7种最先进的算法(FLA、HFPSO、PSOLC、ESMA、LSMA、DETDO和EGJO)。在所有情况下,SCPSO均以最小的均方根误差(SSE)和最小的标准差(如[10- 16,10 -18])优于所有竞争对手,从而证实了其鲁棒性和可靠性。此外,它还展示了达到最优解决方案(少于200次迭代)的最低迭代次数和最佳Friedman Rank (FR = 1),向客户表明了最佳优化。例如,在PEMFC1中,与HFPSO (Std. = 0.001998568)和DETDO (FR = 4)相比,SCPSO的最小SSE为0.02549,可变性可以忽略不计(Std. = 1.05958E-15)。SCPSO的快速收敛曲线、窄框图分布和精确极化曲线在所有燃料电池中得到进一步验证。实验验证了SCPSO的可靠性,其预测电压和功率输出与实验电压和功率输出之间的偏差最小(例如,PEMFC1的RE = 0.052587%, PEMFC2的RE = 0.016537%)。SCPSO的平均运行时间为3.05 s,在保持精度的前提下,提高了算法的运行速度。分析、数据集拟合和收敛曲线的结果表明,自适应参数调优显著提高了该算法的性能,以最快的收敛速度获得了最高的一致性和精度。对于PEMFC参数优化,SCPSO算法的结果证明了它是精度和稳定性最强、计算效率最快的算法。将在未来的研究中研究将其扩展到其他能源系统和动态实时情景,以便在可持续能源管理中得到更广泛的采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A hybrid slime mold enhanced convergent particle swarm optimizer for parameter estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cell.

High efficiency and eco friendliness, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have become a good solution to cleaner energy solutions. However, due to the electrochemical complexity of PEMFCs and the limitations of existing optimization methods, accurately estimating PEMFC parameters to achieve optimal performance is still challenging. In this work, we propose a hybrid optimization algorithm, SCPSO, combining Particle Swarm Optimization with Mixed Mutant Slime Mold to improve precision, consistency, and computational efficiency in PEMFC parameter optimization. Six PEMFC types, BCS 500 W, Nedstack 600 W PS6, SR-12 W, Horizon H-12, Ballard Mark V, and STD 250 W Stack were applied to SCPSO and compared with seven state-of-the-art algorithms, FLA, HFPSO, PSOLC, ESMA, LSMA, DETDO, and EGJO. In all cases, SCPSO consistently outperformed all competitors with the lowest mean sum of squared error (SSE) and minimal standard deviation (e.g., [10-16, 10-18]), thus confirming its robustness and reliability. Additionally, it demonstrated the lowest number of iterations to reach the optimal solution (less than 200 iterations) and best Friedman Rank (FR = 1), signifying the best optimization to the customer. For instance, in PEMFC1, SCPSO achieved minimal SSE of 0.02549 with negligible variability (Std. = 1.05958E-15) as compared to HFPSO (Std. = 0.001998568) and DETDO (FR = 4). SCPSO's rapid convergence curves, narrow box plot spreads, and precise polarization curves were further validated across all fuel cells. SCPSO was experimentally validated and proved to be reliable with minimal deviations between predicted and experimental voltage and power outputs (e.g., RE = 0.052587% for PEMFC1 and RE = 0.016537% for PEMFC2). The average runtime of SCPSO was 3.05 s, which is faster than alternatives, and still maintains its unparalleled precision. The results of the analyses, fitting the datasets and the convergence curves confirm that the adaptive parameter tuning of SCPSO has significantly improved its performance, resulting in the highest consistency and accuracy with the fastest convergence speed. For PEMFC parameter optimization, results from SCPSO have established it as the algorithm with the strongest precision and stability and fastest computational efficiency. The extension to other energy systems and dynamic real time scenarios will be investigated in future research to enable wider adoption in sustainable energy management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信