Russell W De Jong, Amanda Y Dao, James K Aden, John P Marinelli, Isaac D Erbele
{"title":"外伤性脑损伤后人工耳蜗植入。","authors":"Russell W De Jong, Amanda Y Dao, James K Aden, John P Marinelli, Isaac D Erbele","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to determine if a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) degrades postoperative the audiological performance of patients with cochlear implantation (CI).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Defense-wide database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients that were diagnosed with TBI prior to CI between 2005 and 2023. They were matched 2:1 with controls without TBI based on age and sex. Preoperative and postoperative pure tone average (PTA) thresholds and AzBio scores were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen TBI patients representing 20 implanted ears were identified and matched with 39 patients without TBI representing 40 implanted ears. Thirteen ears carried a diagnosis of mild TBI, and seven were diagnosed with moderate to severe TBI. The average follow-up period was 44 months. The TBI group attained mean postoperative PTA and AzBio scores of 37 dB (SD 24) and 67% (SD 28). The non-TBI group attained scores of 31 dB (SD 12) and 69% (SD 26). P-values for the PTA and AzBio intergroup comparisons were .93 and .88, respectively. All TBI ears attained at least sound awareness after implantation, with 79% achieving open-set speech perception compared to 82% of non-TBI ears.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CI after TBI of any severity provides hearing rehabilitation comparable to patients without a prior diagnosis of TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2058-2064"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cochlear Implantation After Traumatic Brain Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Russell W De Jong, Amanda Y Dao, James K Aden, John P Marinelli, Isaac D Erbele\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ohn.1220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to determine if a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) degrades postoperative the audiological performance of patients with cochlear implantation (CI).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Defense-wide database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients that were diagnosed with TBI prior to CI between 2005 and 2023. They were matched 2:1 with controls without TBI based on age and sex. Preoperative and postoperative pure tone average (PTA) thresholds and AzBio scores were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen TBI patients representing 20 implanted ears were identified and matched with 39 patients without TBI representing 40 implanted ears. Thirteen ears carried a diagnosis of mild TBI, and seven were diagnosed with moderate to severe TBI. The average follow-up period was 44 months. The TBI group attained mean postoperative PTA and AzBio scores of 37 dB (SD 24) and 67% (SD 28). The non-TBI group attained scores of 31 dB (SD 12) and 69% (SD 26). P-values for the PTA and AzBio intergroup comparisons were .93 and .88, respectively. All TBI ears attained at least sound awareness after implantation, with 79% achieving open-set speech perception compared to 82% of non-TBI ears.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CI after TBI of any severity provides hearing rehabilitation comparable to patients without a prior diagnosis of TBI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2058-2064\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1220\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是确定创伤性脑损伤(TBI)史是否会降低人工耳蜗植入(CI)患者的术后听力学表现。研究设计:回顾性研究。设置:国防部数据库。方法:使用国际疾病分类第九版(ICD-9)和ICD-10代码对2005年至2023年间在CI之前被诊断为TBI的患者进行识别。根据年龄和性别,他们与没有TBI的对照组的比例为2:1。比较术前和术后纯音平均(PTA)阈值和AzBio评分。结果:识别出19例TBI患者,代表20只植入耳,并与39例非TBI患者,代表40只植入耳进行匹配。13只耳朵被诊断为轻度TBI, 7只耳朵被诊断为中度至重度TBI。平均随访时间为44个月。TBI组术后PTA和AzBio平均评分分别为37 dB (SD 24)和67% (SD 28)。非脑外伤组的评分分别为31 dB (SD 12)和69% (SD 26)。PTA和AzBio组间比较的p值为。分别是93和0.88。所有的TBI耳朵在植入后都至少获得了声音感知,其中79%的耳朵获得了开放式语音感知,而非TBI耳朵的这一比例为82%。结论:任何严重程度的脑外伤后CI提供的听力康复效果与未诊断为脑外伤的患者相当。
Cochlear Implantation After Traumatic Brain Injury.
Objective: The objective of this study is to determine if a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) degrades postoperative the audiological performance of patients with cochlear implantation (CI).
Study design: Retrospective review.
Setting: Department of Defense-wide database.
Methods: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients that were diagnosed with TBI prior to CI between 2005 and 2023. They were matched 2:1 with controls without TBI based on age and sex. Preoperative and postoperative pure tone average (PTA) thresholds and AzBio scores were compared.
Results: Nineteen TBI patients representing 20 implanted ears were identified and matched with 39 patients without TBI representing 40 implanted ears. Thirteen ears carried a diagnosis of mild TBI, and seven were diagnosed with moderate to severe TBI. The average follow-up period was 44 months. The TBI group attained mean postoperative PTA and AzBio scores of 37 dB (SD 24) and 67% (SD 28). The non-TBI group attained scores of 31 dB (SD 12) and 69% (SD 26). P-values for the PTA and AzBio intergroup comparisons were .93 and .88, respectively. All TBI ears attained at least sound awareness after implantation, with 79% achieving open-set speech perception compared to 82% of non-TBI ears.
Conclusion: CI after TBI of any severity provides hearing rehabilitation comparable to patients without a prior diagnosis of TBI.
期刊介绍:
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.